Reforming of accounting for consequences of emergencies caused by hostilities as an element of state policy

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 162, Issue 11-12, Pages: 104-108

Citation information:
Grytsyshen, D. (2016). Reforming of accounting for consequences of emergencies caused by hostilities as an element of state policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 162(11-12), 104-108. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-21


Dymytrii Grytsyshen
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Zhytomyr State Technological University
103 Cherniakhovsky Str., Zhytomyr, 10005, Ukraine
gritsishen.do@gmail.com

Reforming of accounting for consequences of emergencies caused by hostilities as an element of state policy

Abstract. The authors of the article have improved the existing methodological framework related to accounting for enterprises’ property and property transactions on the temporarily occupied territories with differing order of accounting which depends on accessibility (recognition of property loss, its disposition, preservation, and transportation), which appears to be an informational basis for decision-making concerning enterprises’ activities on the temporarily occupied territories.

The article deals with methodological proceedings of accounting for economic and environmental consequences of the hostilities for enterprises fully or partly functioning within a territory during or in connection with hostilities with regard to: 1) business activities on the territory controlled by state authorities in the part of the structure of inventory objects and the relevant results, valuation of current and non-current assets and operation cost, as well as the reflection of loss of assets on the accounts, work in progress and the costs involved; 2) business activities on the territory outside the control of state authorities in the part of the preservation of property and the writing-off of loss of property, which is determined by the ability to receive official information.

Keywords: Accounting; Public Management; Accounting Legislation; Consequences of Emergencies; Loss; Property; Liabilities; Autonomous Republic of Crimea; Donetsk Region; Luhansk Region

JEL Classіfіcatіon: M40; M41

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-21

References

  1. Alcira, K., Eriksson, J., Muscat, R., Arnold, M., & Scott, C. (1998). The World Bank’s Experience with Post-Conflict Reconstruction. Washington DC: The World Bank, Operations Evaluation Department.
  2. Bhatia, M. (2005). Postconflict Profit: The Political Economy of Intervention. Global Governance, 11(2), 205-24.
    Retrieved from http://journals.rienner.com/doi/pdf/10.5555/ggov.2005.11.2.205
  3. Castillo, G. (2015). Economic Reconstruction and Reforms in Post-Conflict Countries. Ralph Bunche Institute of International Studies, Graduate Center, City University of New York (CUNY). CRPD Working Paper, 25,1-28.
  4. Evdokymov, V. (2010). Adaptive model of integrated accounting system: monograph. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr State Technological University (in Ukr.).
  5. Grytsyshen, D. (2015). Accounting in the system of management of economic and environmental security of industrial enterprises: monograph. Zhytomyr: Zhytomyr State Technological University (in Ukr.).
  6. Jacoby, T. (2007). Hegemony, Modernisation and Post-war Reconstruction. Global Society 21(4), 521-537.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820701562751
  7. The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine (2014). On guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of citizens and legal regime on the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine No. 1207-VII as of 15/04/2014 (Law of Ukraine).
    Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1207-18 (in Ukr.)
  8. The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2014). Letter of the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine «On reflection in accounting of assets, located on the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine» No. 31-11410-08-10/15462 as of 19/06/2014.
    Retrieved from http://www.auditcnt.com.ua/news/view_news.php?id=3595 (in Ukr.)
  9. Luckham, R. (2004). The International Community and State Reconstruction in Wartorn Societies. Conflict, Security & Development 4(3), 481-507.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1467880042000320023
  10. The Ministry of Finance of Ukraine (2014). On amendments to the regulatory acts regarding inventorying of assets and liabilities. No. 1214 as of 19/12/2014. Order of the Ministry of Finance.
    Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z1638-14 (in Ukr.)
  11. The Cabinet of Minister of Ukraine (1997). On preservation of fixed production assets of enterprise No. 1183 as of 28/10/1997. Resolution.
    Retrieved from http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1183-97-%D0%BF (in Ukr.)
  12. The Cabinet of Minister of Ukraine (1997). On amendments to Guideline of presentation of financial reporting» No. 718 as of 29/12/2014. Resolution.
    Retrieved from http://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/718-2014-%D0%BF (in Ukr.)
  13. Svirko, S., & Osadcha, O. (2014). The category of economic benefit as an estimation of revenues and expenditures. The Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1),30-33.
    Retrieved from http://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v137-08/
  14. Tzifakis, N., & Charalambos, T. (2006). Economic Reconstruction of Bosnia and Herzegovina: The Lost Decade. Ethnopolitics 5(1), 67-84.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17449050600576316
  15. Ukrainian institute has prepared rating of takeovers. (2015, March 11). UkrMedia.
    Retrieved from https://ukr.media/politics/229026 (in Ukr.)
  16. UkrOboronProm lost 12 companies in anti-terrorist operation area (2015, January 22). Ukrainian Week LLC.
    Retrieved from http://tyzhden.ua/News/128202 (in Ukr.)

Received 15.09.2016