Macroeconomic growth in business valuation

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 175, Issue 1-2, Pages: 18-23

Citation information:
Almási, B. Z., Zéman, Z. (2019). Macroeconomic growth in business valuation. Economic Annals-XXI, 175(1-2), 18-23. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-03


Bálint Zsolt Almási
PhD Student (Economics),
Assistant Lecturer,
Accounting Department,
Faculty of Finance and Accounting,
Budapest Business School
10-12 Buzogány Str., Budapest, 1149, Hungary
almasi.balint@pszfb.bgf.hu
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1377-9431

Zoltán Zéman
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences,
Szent István University
1 Páter K. Str., Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary
zeman.zoltan@gtk.szie.hu
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2504-028X

Macroeconomic growth in business valuation

Abstract. The article is dedicated to an important statement, mostly neglected by the overtly finance-focused valuation practice in the present days regarding the influence of the macroeconomic conditions of the system on the business value. It should not only be perceived and analysed through discount businesses and capital expenditure, but the underlying effect of the system as well. In our view, the analysis of macroeconomic effects does not only aid in the refinement of business value calculation, but also in its forecast and long-term analysis, and even in comparative methods.

Occurrences accompanied by immediate, specific, and irreversible transactions only provide part of business valuation and value production tasks. In other cases, business value production is forced to work with uncertain data and forecasts. The solution for long-term value production processes could be analysis methods tailored to macroeconomic trends.

Even with the numerous distorting factors not filtered yet, it can be concluded that the risk premium content of equity returns changes in relation to its deviance from the GDP trend. It means that conjuncture cycles influence share yield expectations, and through this the value of the shares themselves, as well as the business value.

The authors examine whether and how conjuncture cycles affect additional risk premiums, and through that, business value, working with two basic datasets. They analyse the link between the growth of US real GDP in 1961-2018 and the calculated risk interest premium from the S&P500 portfolio dividend discount model for the same timeframe. It has been considered that, when the market prices-in probable events, the switch point of a conjuncture cycle can be forecast from the variation of additional risk premiums and vice versa. The authors have found that interest premiums show double amplitude compared to conjuncture-cycle fluctuation, meaning that interest premiums peak before the conjuncture switch points. Hence, a connection between them is presumable, while its force and direction are described at a later point. Future research will be aimed at analysis the tightness of these connections by sectors with the help of industry betas, especially data concerning Europe, and Hungary.

Keywords: Macroeconomic Growth; Business Cycles; Business Valuation; Conjuncture Cycles; Additional Risk Premiums; Value; US GDP

JEL Classification: E44; F44; G17

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V175-03

References

  1. Greenspan, A. (2007). The Age of Turbulence. New York: The Penguin Press.
  2. Damodaran, A. (2002). Investment Valuation: Tools and Techniques for Determining the Value of Any Asset (2nd edition). New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  3. Damodaran, A. (2013). Equity Risk Premiums (ERP): Determinants, Estimation and Implications (2013 edition). New York University: Stern School of Business.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2238064
  4. Damodaran, A. (2019). Data Sets Collection.
    Retrieved from http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar
  5. Brealey, R. A., Myers, S. C., & Allen, F. (2005). Principles of Corporate Finance. New York: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  6. Lentner, Cs. (2010). Some historical and international aspects of the Hungarian economic crisis and its management. Public Finance Quarterly, 55(3), 561-584.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312041620_A_magyar_gazdasagi_valsag_es_valsagkezeles_nehany_torteneti_es_nemzetkozi_aspektusa (in Hungarian)
  7. Duarte, F., & Rosa, C. (2013, October 30). The Equity Risk Premium: A Consensus of Models. Social Science Research Network (SSRN).
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2377504
  8. Duarte, F., & Rosa, C. (2015, February). The Equity Risk Premium: A Review of Models. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports No. 714.
    Retrieved from https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr714.pdf
  9. Hunyadi, L., & Vita, L. (2003). Statistics for economists. Budapest: KSH (in Hungarian).
  10. Jánossy, F. (1975). On the trend line of economic development. Budapest: Magvető Könyvkiadó (in Hungarian).
  11. Sander, M. (2018). Market timing over the business cycle. Journal of Empirical Finance, 46, 130-145.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jempfin.2017.12.002
  12. Marosán, G. (2008). Crises in history, history of crises (in Hungarian).
  13. Gadea Rivas, M. D., Gómez-Loscos, A., & Bandrés, E. (2017). Clustering Regional Business Cycles. Banco de Espana Working Paper No. 1744.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087272
  14. Baltas, N., & Karyampas, D. (2018). Forecasting the equity risk premium: The importance of regime-dependent evaluation. Journal of Financial Markets, 38, 83-102.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.finmar.2017.11.002
  15. Tarján, T. (2000). Jánossy’s theory in the light of the new growth theory. Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review), 67, 457-472.
    Retrieved from http://efolyoirat.oszk.hu/00000/00017/00060/pdf/tarjan.pdf (in Hungarian)
  16. Koller, T., Goedhart, M., & Wessels, D. (2010). Valuation: Measuring and Managing the Value of Companies (5th revised edition). New Jersey: Wiley & Sons Inc.
    Retrieved from http://elibrary.bsu.az/books_200/N_1.pdf
  17. Delcey, T. (2019). Samuelson vs Fama on the Efficient Market Hypothesis: The Point of View of Expertise. OEconomia, 9(1), 37-58.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/oeconomia.5300
  18. Tase, M. (2019). Sectoral dynamics and business cycles. Economics Letters, 175, 60-63.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2018.12.014