Influence of the quality of education on social and labour relations in the country

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 189, Issue 5-6(1), Pages: 79-89

Citation information:
Kolomiets, O., Litvinova, T., Akуeva, N., Kareva, E., & Kondakchian, N. (2021). Influence of the quality of education on social and labour relations in the country. Economic Annals-XXI, 189(5-6(1)), 79-89. doi:

Olga Kolomiets
PhD (Pedagogy),
Associate Professor,
Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Medical Psychology,
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Tatijana Litvinova
PhD (Pharmaceutics),
Аssociate Professor,
Vice-Rector for Academic Affairs,
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Nurgozel Akуeva
PhD (Biology),
Senior Lecturer of the
Department of Human Anatomy,
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Elena Kareva
PhD (Medicine),
Professor of the Department of Pharmacology,
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Nataliia Kondakchian
PhD (Linguistics),
Associate Professor,
Institute of Linguistics and Intercultural Communication,
I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
8-2 Trubetskaya Str., Moscow, 119991, Russian Federation

Influence of the quality of education on social and labour relations in the country

Abstract. Introduction. Transition of the education system to the new state standards defined social order to the teacher: ensure that each student achieves learning results of such quality level which corresponds with the requirements of society. This goal achievement will require significant changes in the field of professional teaching activity, development of new relevant approaches. Teachers’ experience of classes organization in different educational institutions in the framework of their upskilling and retraining in the Institute of Teacher Career Development (Moscow, Russia) shows that their professional activities and the didactic materials used do not adequately implement the psychological patterns of the educational process. They do not adequately implement the processes of mastering and formation of students’ mental actions and concepts, thinking activity; and the teaching and learning activity of the students do not correspond to its psychological structure and content. Teachers reduce the meaning and content of their activity to explaining the material, transferring the «finished» knowledge to the student and demonstrating methods of solving practical problems in a specific domain in the form of samples or algorithms. At that, the emphasis is largely laid on hereditary and individual capabilities of educational process subjects, rather than on universal psychological mechanisms of social experience adoption process. Despite all attempts to optimize the educational process, educational institutions graduates’ proficiency level varies.

The adoption of the Russian federal target program of education development for 2016-2020 meets the requirements of modern innovative socially oriented development of the Russian Federation. It highlighted the problem of educational process theory and its organization practice failure to solve the problem of quality education inavailability for each learner. The researches of foreign authors in the field of education conducted over the past 20 years give the priority to the problem of providing quality educational results by the teacher, the solution of which is directly related to the development of his or her professional activity, new educational technologies and courseware for the educational process.

The purpose of this work is to assess the impact of the quality of education on the economic development of the country in social and labour relations.

Results. The conducted research allows us to confirm that changes in the state of development of social and labour relations in the national economy in the direction of improvement or degradation are due to a number of factors of macroeconomic, demographic and migration nature and indicators of the education sector effectiveness. At the same time, educational factors both in aggregate in the form of an integral indicator (for the 3rd block of factors), and separately (for indicators: trained (graduated) qualified workers and university graduates, the share of employed graduates of technical education institutions and universities financing education by the public sector) have a direct significant relationship.

Conclusions. The study confirms that the changes in the development of social and industrial relations in the national economy towards improvement or degradation are caused by a number of macroeconomic, demographic and migration background factors and indicators of the effectiveness of the education sector. Factors such as educational-related in the form of an integral indicator, as well as separately have direct significant relationship.

Keywords: University; Medical education; Educational Technologies; Labour; Economics; Analysis; Psychology

JEL Classіfіcatіon: H52; I23; P36

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed personally to this work.



  1. Anand, Ch. K., Bisaillon, V., Webster, A., & Amor, B. (2015). Integration of sustainable development in higher education – a regional initiative in Quebec (Canada). Journal of Cleaner Production, 108(A), 916-923.
  2. Bizerril, M., Rosa, M. J., Carvalho, T., & Pedrosa, J. (2018). Sustainability in higher education: a review of contributions from portuguese speaking countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 171, 600-612.
  3. Boni, A., & Walker, M. (2016). Universities and global human development: theoretical and empirical insights for social change. London: Routledge.
  4. Campbell, A. C., & Mawer, M. (2019). Clarifying mixed messages: international scholarship programmes in the sustainable development agenda. Higher education Policy, 32, 167-184.
  5. Chankseliani, M., Gorgodze, S., Janashia, S., & Kurakbayev, K. (2020). Rural disadvantage in the context of centralised university admissions: a multiple case study of Georgia and Kazakhstan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International education, 50(7), 995-1013.
  6. Gorgodze, S., Macharashvili, L., & Kamladze, A. (2000). Learning for earning: student expectations and perceptions of university. International education Studies, 13(1), 42-53.
  7. Gupta, H., & Singhal, N. (2017). Framework for embedding sustainability in business schools: a review. Vision: The Journal of Business Perspective, 21(2),195-203.
  8. Muller, I., & Tempelhoff, J. (2016). The application of a resilience assessment approach to promote campus environmental management. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher education, 17(2), 228-245.
  9. Naushad, M. (2018). A study on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions among Saudi students. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 600-617.
  10. Nuamah, S. A. (2018). Achievement Oriented: Developing Positive Academic Identities for Girl Students at an Urban School. American educational Research Journal, 55(6), 1307-1338.
  11. Opposs, D., Baird, J.-A., Chankseliani, M., Stobart, G., Kaushik, A., McManus, H., & Johnson, D. (2020). Governance structure and standard setting in educational assessment. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(2), 192-214.
  12. Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A. & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(3), 354-372.
  13. Schmidt, W. H., Burroughs, N. A., Zoido, P., & Houang, R. T. (2015). The role of schooling in perpetuating educational inequality: an international perspective. Educational Researcher, 44(7), 371-386.
  14. Streimikiene, D., Bilan, Y., Jasinskas, E., & Griksaite, R. (2016). Migration Trends in Lithuania and other New EU Member States. Transformations in Business & Economics, 15(1), 21-33.
  15. Strielkowski, W., Kiseleva, L.S., & Popova, E. N. (2018). Factors determining the quality of university education: students’ views. Integration of education, 22(2), 220-236.
  16. Thomas, R., & Ormerod, N. (2017). The (almost) imperceptible impact of tourism research on policy and practice. Tourism Management, 62, 379-389.
  17. Versteijlen, M., Salgado, F. P., Groesbeek, M. J., & Counotte, A. (2017). Pros and cons of online education as a measure to reduce carbon emissions in higher education in The Netherlands. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 80-89.
  18. Volchik, V., Klimenko, L., & Posukhova, O. (2018). Socio-economic sustainable development and the precariat: a case study of three Russian cities. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1), 411-428.
  19. Yu, M.-Ch., Wu, Y.-Ch. J., Alhalabi, W., Kao, H.-Y., & Wu, W.-H. (2016). ResearchGate: An effective altmetric indicator for active researchers? Computers in Human Behavior, 55(B), 1001-1006.
  20. Zairi, M. (2010). Benchmarking for best practice. Routledge, London.

Received 9.04.2021
Received in revised form 29.04.2021
Accepted 3.05.2021
Available online 10.06.2021