Institutional defects of international air transportation market

Economic Annals-XXI: Volume 128, Issue 3-4(2), Pages: 20-23

Citation information:
Mykhalchenko, I. (2013). Institutional defects of international air transportation market. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(2), 20-23. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v128-06/


Inna Mykhalchenko
Lecturer,
Department for International Economics,
National Aviation University, Kyiv, Ukraine
i.mykhalchenko@mail.ru

Institutional defects of international air transportation market

Abstract. The main institution of air transportation market is the international organization of civil aviation. However, many states-participants don’t use ICAO recommendations in practice, but some of them do not consider appendixes to Chicago Convention. That’s why the nature of ICAO rules is incomprehensible: are they recommendatory or obligatory? The research of ICAO regulation aspects gives concrete expression of ICAO functional advantages and disadvantages. It is set that there is no clear mechanism of compulsion ICAO rules and effective sanctions in case of their non-fulfillment by participants. Countries keep rules variously and in a different measure, which testify to ICAO functional fragmentation in the world. Therefore there is a requirement in rationalization of ICAO regulations, methods of development such regulations, improvement of management. It’s necessary to develop the external mechanism of compulsion. But before, it should be taken into account the possibilities of every country in providing this mechanism.

Keywords: International Air Transportation Market; ICAO; Rules; Mechanism of Compulsion; Fragmentation

JEL Classification: L51; L93; O17; O19

References

  1. Mykhalchenko, I. (2012). Institutional Provision Features of Global Air Transportation Market. Paper presented at 7th Int. Symp. «Contemporary Problems of Global Processes in the Economics» (pp. 157-158). Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  2. Mykhalchenko, I. (2012). The Market as Economic Institution. Paper presented at 7th Int. Symp. «Flight. Contemporary Problems of Science» (p. 383). Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  3. Gerasymov, R. (2008). Development of the Principles and Norms of International Law on Safeguarding the Civil Aviation. (Dr. juridical sci. diss., Institute of Legislation of the Parliament of Ukraine). Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  4. Gavrilova, J. (2012). International Law Regulation of Air Space. (Dr. juridical sci. diss., Institute of Legislation of the Parliament of Ukraine). Kyiv, Ukraine (in Ukr.).
  5. Convention on International Civil Aviation: DOC 7300/9 (2006). (Ninth Edition). Montreal: ICAO.
  6. Gerasymov, R. (2007). Development of International Law State Responsibility before the Intergovernmental Organization in the Field of Civil Aviation Protection. Law of Ukraine, 10, 131-136 (in Ukr.).
  7. Kolomoyskyy Is the Owner of UIA (2012). Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
    Retrieved from http://tyzhden.ua/News/69831 (in Ukr.)
  8. White, H., & Abass, A. (2003). Countermeasures and Forms of International Responsibility. University Press Oxford.
  9. Buergenthal, T. (1969). Law-Making in the International Civil Organization. University Press Syracuse.
  10. United States of America, Federal Aviation Administration «International Aviation Safety Assessments (IASA) Program». Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication.
    Retrieved from http://www.faa.gov/safety/programs_initiatives/oversight/iasa
  11. ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme (Confidential – Declassified). Final Audit Report of the Federal Aviation Administration of the United States (1999). Montreal: ICAO.
  12. An agreement on aviation safety strengthens relations between ICAO and EU (2008). Computer-Mediated Communication.
    Retrieved from http://legacy.icao.int/icao/en/nr/2008/pio200806_r.pdf (in Russ.)

Received 12.03.2013