Privatization as a factor of public goods reproduction mechanism transformation in Ukraine

Economic Annals-XXI: Volume 131, Issue 7-8(1), Pages: 26-29

Citation information:
Kichurchak, M. (2013). Privatization as a factor of public goods reproduction mechanism transformation in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8(1), 26-29. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v131-07/

Marianna Kichurchak
PhD (Economics),
Senior Lecturer,
Lviv National University named after Ivan Franko, Ukraine
Marianna_Kichurchak@ukr.net

Privatization as a factor of public goods reproduction mechanism transformation in Ukraine

Abstract. The estimation of privatization and its peculiarities as a factor of transformation of public goods reproduction system is investigated in the article. The uniformity of privatization process’s scope by Ukrainian regions was evaluated based on calculation of relative concentration index of alienated objects and characterized as redistributable relations foundation for public goods production. Using a regressive-correlation analysis, the existence of visional connection between the relative concentration index of alienated objects and the deficit level of consolidated budget was determined; middle force connection between this index and increase rates of GDP was found. The author specifies that processes of public goods production regulation are oriented on stability adjusting in providing of corresponding volumes of budget resources, though there is scanty attention on creation of proper social and economical conditions for positive changes. The forming of efficient mechanism of public goods reproduction envisages completion of privatization, guaranteeing of its procedure transparency and providing of more effective state property management.

Keywords: Privatization; Reproduction; Public Goods; Property Relations; Production; Transformation

JEL Classification: C10; H41; H82; L33

References

1. Stiglitz, J. E., & Sappington, D. E. (1987). Privatization, information and incentives (Working Paper No 2196). Cambridge, MA 02138: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w2196.pdf?new_window=1
2. Coase, R. H. (1991). The Firm, the Market and the Law. New-York: Teletext (in Russ.).
3. Bashnyanyn, H. I., & Honcharuk, L. Ya. (2010). Efficiency of economic system’s socialization: methodological problems of metrological analysis. Lviv: Novyi Svit-2000 (in Ukr.).
4. Parker, D. (2004, February). The UK’s Privatization Experiment: the Passage of Time Permits a Sober Assessment (CESifo Working Paper No. 1126).
   Retrieved from http://cyberinet03.inet-tr.org.tr/telekom/cesifo1_ wp1126.pdf
5. Filipenko, A. (2005). Post-orange transformation of economic policy of Ukraine. Ekonomicnij Casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 3-4, 3-7.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/archive/ (in Ukr.)
6. The State Property Fund of Ukraine (2013). Reports about work of the State Property Fund of Ukraine, affairs and results of fulfilment of the Government program of privatizing in 2000-2012.
   Retrieved from http://www.spfu.gov.ua/_layouts/SPFUSiteDefinition/ReportsMFI.aspx (in Ukr.).
7. Arkhangelskyi, Yu., & Radzievskyi, O. (2008). About efficiency of privatization in Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economics of Ukraine), 9, 86-91 (in Ukr.)
8. Panchenko, I. (2012). «Que Vadis?» The incident «Ukrainian privatization». Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economics of Ukraine), 2, 46-59 (in Ukr.)
9. Statistical Annual of Ukraine for 2011 (2012). In O. H. Osaulenko (Ed.). Kyiv: August Trade (in Ukr.).
10. Heiets, V. M., Yefymenko, T. I., Libanova, E. M. et al. (2011). In M. Ya. Azarov (Ed.). The State budget and budget Strategy 2012-2014: stabilization and sustainable development under reformation of Ukrainian economy. Kyiv: Academy of Financial Management (in Ukr.).
11. Arkhiereev, S. I., Malyi, I. I. et al. (2008). In A. A. Hritsenko (Ed.). The institutional architectonic and dynamics of economic transformation. Kharkiv: Fort (in Russ.).
12. Varnalii, Z., & Mazur, I. (2007). The basic pre-conditions and ways of corporate raid overcoming in Ukraine. Kyiv: The National Institute for Strategic Studies.
    Retrieved from http://old.niss.gov.ua/Monitor/juli/1.htm (in Ukr.)
13. Bila, S. O., Zhalilo, Ya. A. et al. (2008). Ukrainian privatization. In V. Vorotin (Ed.). Kyiv: NISS (in Ukr.).
14. The State Property Fund of Ukraine (2012). About the State Program of Privatization (Law of Ukraine).
    Retrieved from http://www.spfu.gov.ua/_layouts/SPFUSiteDefinition/RegulationsDetails.aspx?ID=2176 (in Ukr.)
15. Dubrovskyi, V., Paskhaver, O., Verkhovoda, L., & Blashchyk, B. (2007). The conditions of completion of privatization in Ukraine. Kyiv-Warsaw: Centre of Social and Economic Studies (in Ukr.).
16. National Bank of Ukraine (2013). Monthly Analytical and Statistical Edition of NBU, 2 (in Ukr.).
17. Ashinov, S. A., Bukreev, V. V., & Rudyk, E. N. (2008). Privatization in Russia: searches of effective decisions. Imushchestvennye otnosheniya v Rossiiskoi Federatsii (The Property Relations in Russian Federation), 12, 47-57 (in Russ.).
18. Liberalization and privatization in the Eastern European Countries (2008, January). Report on the work package 7.
    Retrieved from http://www.raumplanung.tu-dortmund.de/irpud/presom/fileadmin/docs/presom/external/ Publications/WP7.pdf
19. Blyzniuk, V. V., Hritsenko, A. A., Kvasniuk, B. Ye. et al. (2003). In V. M. Heiets (Ed.). Economy of Ukraine: strategy and policy of long-term development. Kyiv: Feniks (in Ukr.).
20. Soskin, O. (2002). The rupture of reproduction process on national level as the basic reason of problem’s appearance of capital’s legalization. Ekonomicnij Casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 5, 5-7.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/archive/ (in Ukr.)
21. Budkin, V. (2007). Post-socialistic transformation of property. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economic of Ukraine), 2, 39-44 (in Ukr.).

Received 31.05.2013