The social contract strategy: government – corporation – person

Economic Annals-XXI: Volume 133, Issue 9-10(1), Pages: 91-94

Citation information:
Burlutskiy, S., & Burlutskaya, S. (2013). The social contract strategy: government – corporation – person. Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10(1), 91-94. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v133-24/

Serhiy Burlutskiy
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Donbass State Machine Engineering Academy
39 Mashinostroiteley Ave, Kramatorsk, Donetsk region, Ukraine
magistrdr@mail.ru

Svitlana Burlutskaya
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Donbass State Machine Engineering Academy
39 Mashinostroiteley Ave, Kramatorsk, Donetsk region, Ukraine
lana_b75@mail.ru

The social contract strategy: government – corporation – person

Abstract. Introduction. The problem of social partnership as belonging to society is one of the sharpest for modern Ukraine. Social security is a consequence of realization of a basic right of belonging to society, the right of participation and inclusion in social and economic life. Purpose is to explore institutional procedures and structures of the social contract formation strategy directed on realization of the address principle of social benefit granting. Results. The achievement of sustained socio-economic development in the conditions of civil society formation and the social contract dominant becomes possible on the basis of the agreement development strategy usage between the government – corporation – person is proved in the article. The structure and the contents of institutional elements, which form the basis of the social contract, are defined. Conclusion. Offered strategy of the social contract formation realization will provide achievement of the maximum addressing of the social benefit. Efficiency of strategy in many respects is defined by obligatory stimulation of households offer system.

Keywords: Social Partnership; Welfare; Institutional Procedure; Social Policy; Social Contract; Social Benefit

JEL Classification: E69; H10; H53; H55; I38

References

1. Reich, R. (1998). The New Meaning of Corporate Social Responsibility. California Management Review, 40(2), 8-17.
2. Brooks, N. (2006). The social benefits and economic costs of taxation. Ottawa: CCPA.
3. Soskin, O. (2013). Role of state regulation in forming of modern economic model: changing imperative in the conditions of chaos. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 3-7.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v125-01/ (in Ukr.)
4. Krutiy, O. (2007). Dialogic soil of civil company as condition of effective local self-government. In V. Lisnichiy (Ed.) Politically-administrative potential of organs of local self-government of city (pp. 93-114). Kharkiv: Magistr (in Ukr.).
5. Sokur, N. (2006). Forming of social partnership is in Ukraine. Aktualni problemy derzhavnoho upravlinnia (Actual Problems of State Administration), 3(27), 254-258 (in Ukr).
6. Belyatskyi, S. (2012). Stable development of economics in conditions of social guarantees: international experience and Ukrainian prospect. Economic Annals-XXI, 11-12(1), 6-8.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v123-02/ (in Ukr.)
7. Buchanan, J. M. (1999). Demand and Supply of Public Goods. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.
8. Burlutskyi, S. (2012). Methodological basis of social politics’ models forming. Chasopys ekonomichnykh reform (Annals of Economic Reforms), 3(7), 96-101 (in Ukr.).

Received 12.08.2013