Rating procedures usage for management model of higher education institution formation

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 139, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 62-65

Citation information:
Dzoba, O. (2014). Rating procedures usage for management model of higher education institution formation. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 62-65. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v139-16/

Oleh Dzoba
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Vice-Rector for Scientific Work,
Ivano-Frankivsk National Technical University of Oil and Gas
15 Karpatska Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76019, Ukraine
odzoba@nung.edu.ua

Rating procedures usage for management model of higher education institution formation

Abstract. Introduction. Current task of the higher education institutions system of management improving is to find and develop effective tools to evaluate the quality of education, quality of educational activities, quality of management systems in educational institutions and quality of scientific and academic staff. Improvement efficiency of rating evaluation procedures of complex management objects, which include higher educational institutions, needs deepening the research in the direction of mastering the classification of rating models and development of evaluation tools. The purpose of the paper is further development and deepening of approaches to classification of rating models, improvement of the theoretical and methodological foundations and tools for rating evaluation of scientific and academic staff, departments, and schools within the higher education institution (HEI), improving approaches to managing of HEI using comprehensive rating evaluation. The methodological bases of research, used in the preparation of this paper, are the methods of theoretical generalization, dialectics and logic, systematic economic analysis.

Results. The list of classification parametres of existing rating models was expanded by highlighting such features as hierarchy of evaluation subjects, hierarchy of evaluation objects, hierarchy of rating consumers and adaptation potential. The expediency to apply the rating model in today’s HEI, focused on improving the efficiency of interaction with objects of evaluation, is considered. As the result of research, a multilevel structure of this interaction, a large number of evaluation objects, their structural subordination, presence of hierarchical interrelationships, presence of many rating consumers (subjects of decision making), which also are elements of the management hierarchy of higher education institution are substantiated.

Conclusions. The classification of rating models by selecting their new classes, that take into account complex hierarchy of subjects and objects of evaluation and rating consumers, and also adaptation potential of rating models according to changing internal and external environment and system of HEI goals was conducted. The improved method for the individual rating of scientific and academic staff determination as basis for formation of complex rating evaluation system of HEI was proposed. The structure of adaptive management of HEI using the results of the rating evaluation was developed, which allows undertaking of more perfect and effective management decisions.

Keywords: Higher Education Institution; Rating Model; Rating Evaluation Objects; Adaptive Management; Internal Environment

JEL Classification: I23; O15; O33

References

1. Serohin, S. M., & Sharov, Yu. P. (2010). Evaluation of activity performance of the departments and scientific-pedagogical workers. Publіchne upravlіnnia: teorіa ta praktyka (Public Administration: Theory and Practice), 2, 22-27 (in Ukr.).
2. Vitlinskyi, V. V., Obolenska T. Ye., & Zhyhotska, N. V. (2000). Modeling of higher education institution’s rating. Ekonomichna kibernetyka (Economic Cybernetics), 3-4, 63-74 (in Ukr.).
3. Horskyi, P. (2002). Position of the analytic rank type of rating.
   Retrieved from http://www.cfin.ru/management/rating.shtml (in Russ.)
4. Ivchenko, N. B., & Havrashenko, M. O. (2011). Model of rating evaluation and management of the bank. Vostochnoevropeiskyi zhurnal peredovykh tekhnolohiy (Eastern European Journal of Advanced Technologies), 4(8), 48-51 (in Ukr.).
5. Karminskiy, A. M., Peresetskiy, A. A., & Petrov, A. E. (2005). Ratings in economics: methodology and practice. Moscow: Finansy i statistika (in Russ.).
6. Kinytskyi, Ya. T., & Holovko, O. V. (2011). Rating evaluation of scientific and pedagogical staff of the University and the effectiveness of their academic work. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu (Herald of Khmelnitsky National University), 3, 60-63 (in Ukr.).
7. Bohatov, O.Y., Lysenko, Yu. H., Petrenko, V. L., & Skobelev, V. H. (1999). Rating control of economic systems. Donetsk: South East (in Russ).
8. Myronova, L. H (2011). Classification of rating models and decision-making. Efektyvna ekonomika (Effective Economy).
   Retrieved from http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/ (in Ukr.)
9. Timokhina, Ja. V., & Timokhin, V. N. (2008). Model of motivation management at the industrial enterprise. Ekonomichna kibernetyka (Economic Cybernetics), 5-6, 72-77 (in Russ.).
10. Engelmann, B., Hayden, E., & Tasche, D. (2003, January). Testing rating accuracy. Risk Magazine, pp. 82-86.
11. Marczyk, J. (2009). A New theory of risk and rating. Trento: Editrice Uniservice.
12. Shin, J. Ch., Toutkoushian, R. K., & Teichler, U. (2011). University Rankings. Theoretical Basis, Methodology and Impacts on Global Higher Education. The Changing Academy, 3.
13. Basalaeva, O. H., Basalaev, Ju. M., & Sadovoi, A. N. (2006). Problems of teachers evaluation rating system implementation. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz (University Management: Practice and Analysis), 2(42), 65-68 (in Russ.).
14. Khotomlianskyi, O., & Derevianko, T. (2006). Methodological issues of higher educational institution’s teaching staff results of professional activity evaluation. Osvita i upravlinnia (Education and Management), 9(3-4), 144-151 (in Ukr.).

Received 14.02.2014