Rehabilitation audit: what coal mines are to be invested during the economic recession?

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 139, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 104-106

Citation information:
Tereshchenko, M. (2014). Rehabilitation audit: what coal mines are to be invested during the economic recession? Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 104-106. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v139-27/

Maryna Tereshchenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
National Mining University
19 Karl Marx Ave, Dnipropetrovsk, 49005, Ukraine
Tereshenko_mk@ukr.net

Rehabilitation audit: what coal mines are to be invested during the economic recession?

Abstract. Introduction. Under pressure of restricted public investments and low level of coal mines’ attractiveness, it is important to develop a strategy of defining what a coal mine is worth private investing and introducing a corporation management consistent with efficient extraction of available coal deposits. Therefore, any improvements in the decision making about investing a coal mine through rehabilitation audit are of high importance. The purpose is to develop approaches to rehabilitation audit acceptable for coal mining so that the later may be assessed by potential investors. Results. Thus, government owing coal mines may gradually improve their efficiency under pressure of restricted state budget donations only due to abandoning unprofitable sites and privatizing profitable entities. The most complicated task here is how to distinguish economically perspective and not perspective mines. More decisive approaches are needed to restructure current mining facilities. In addition, there is no benefit in the liquidation of some mines as the first step requires mines’ rehabilitation and modernization with further finding the most efficient mine sites. The rehabilitation audit is usually undertaken for those companies that suffer financial losses. The main criterion for making a decision about rehabilitation or abandoning a company is its rehabilitation ability. However, available approach to rehabilitation audit does not reflect all specifies of the mining industry, which has three main pillars – nature, technology and operations. So, we offer to use the term «the level of the rehabilitation attractiveness» of a mine. It is a quantitative dimension of system efficiency. Hence, we can draw the theory of a mine that is useless to be rehabilitated if the specific margin value of its efficiency, which shows its being not perspective, is found. It is necessary to define what conditions should be met so that the extraction of anthracite, which is difficult to be reached, is efficient compared to the alternative of abandoning these deposits not extracted. Considering costs as marginal monetary value is rational since this is a business outlook of an investor willing to establish a corporation and donate a mine. However, the coal extraction has a business perspective under complicated geological conditions if total costs to extract all deposits within a mine site are lower than the highest costs among other Ukrainian mines extracting coal of the same mark. Conclusion. The rehabilitation audit allows assessing a mine’s ability to return its debts, confirm its financial independence and consistency between available assets and business strategy. It was justified that the rehabilitation audit undertaken for mining sites implies corporate ownership of coal deposits and their extraction with lowering costs compared to the scenario if only one owner explores new mining sites with limited investment amount.

Keywords: Coal-Mining Enterprise; State Budget; Investment Attractiveness; Restructuring; Rehabilitation Audit; Cost; Financial Analysis

JEL Classification: M11; М41; O10

References

1. Amosha, A. I., Iliashov, M. A., & Salli, V. I. (2002). System analysis of a mine as the investment object. Donetsk: IEE of the NAS of Ukraine (in Ukr.).
2. Pivnyak, G. G., Amosha, A. I., Yashchenko, Y. P. et al. (2004). Mine facilities reprocessing and investment processes in the coal industry of Ukraine. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka (in Ukr.).
3. Vagonova, A. G. (2005). Peculiarities of the coal mine functioning as natural, technological and economic system. Ekonomika: problemy teorii ta praktyky (Economics: Problems of Theory and Practice), 4, 890-898 (in Ukr.).
4. Galushko, O. S. (2008). Efficiency evaluation of investment and innovative mechanism: enterprise, region, state. Paper presented at International Scientific and Practical Conference «Problems and future of Ukrainian economy innovative development» (pp. 12-14). Dnipropetrovsk: National Mining University (in Ukr.).
5. Negrych, О. I. (2012). Finding criteria for classification of the motives influencing foreign direct investments. Economic Annals-XXI, 5-6, 27-29.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v120-08/ (in Ukr.)
6. Miller, R. R., & Dale, R. W. (1972). The Motivation for Foreign Direct Investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 3(2), 67-79.
7. Ishchenko, M. І. (2013). Mining and beneficiation companies’ liabilities figures correction. Economic Annals-XXI, 11-12(1), 58-61.
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v135-15/ (in Ukr.)
8. Adams, R. (1995). Audit fundamentals. Moscow, Russia: Finance and Statistics (in Russ.).
9. Аrens, A., & Lobbek, G. (1995). Audit. Moscow, Russia: Finance and Statistics (in Russ.).
10. The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine (2000). On the approval of pre-judicial restructuring procedure for state enterprises (Order).
    Retrieved from http://zakon1.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/515 (in Ukr.)
11. Pavlenko, I. I., Salli, S. V., & Tereshchenko, M. K. (2008). Economic assessment of coal reserves in terms of corporate mining. Ekonomichnyi visnyk Natsionalnoho hirnychoho universytetu (Economic Herald of National Mining University), 3, 97-102 (in Ukr.).

Received 08.03.2014