The usage and meaning of the term «comparative advantage» in pre-Ricardian economics

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 146, Issue 11-12, Pages: 4-7

Citation information:
Grancay, M. (2014). The usage and meaning of the term «comparative advantage» in pre-Ricardian economics. Economic Annals-XXI, 11-12, 4-7. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v146-01/


Martin Grancay
PhD (Economics),
University of Economics in Bratislava
1/B Dolnozemska cesta, Bratislava, 85235, Slovak Republic
martin.grancay@euba.sk

The usage and meaning of the term «comparative advantage» in pre-Ricardian economics

Abstract. The goal of this paper is to show how historical usage of the term «comparative advantage» developed from random mentions of the term in papers from various fields of science in the beginning of the 18th century to a more specific usage in agriculture, and later in international economics. We apply computerized text analysis using 3 voluminous databases operated by GALE CENGAGE Learning. Based at 50 million pages of text from the 18th/19th centuries, we have identified mentions of «comparative advantage» in pre-Ricardian texts. Our results show that before the 1820s, the term «comparative advantage» was used in a context more similar to the principle of «absolute advantage» than to its modern use and meaning. No research studying usage of the term «comparative advantage» has been published up to this date; hence, the present paper opens discussion in this field.

Keywords: Comparative Advantage; Absolute Advantage; Pre-Ricardian Economics; Classical Economics; Text Analysis

JEL Classification: B12

References

  1. De Vivo, G. (2010). Robert Torrens as a Neglected Economist. In N. Allington & N. W. Thompson (Eds.). English, Irish and Subversives Among the Dismal Scientists (pp. 89-110). Bingley: Emerald Publishing.
  2. Leser, E. (1881). Untersuchungen zur Geschichte der Nationalokonomie. Berlin: Historisches Wirtschaftsarchiv (in Germ.).
  3. Seligman, E. R. A. (1903). On Some Neglected British Economists. The Economic Journal, 13(51), 335-363.
    Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2221519
  4. Seligman, E. R. A., & Hollander, J. H. (1911). Ricardo and Torrens. The Economic Journal, 21(83), 448-468.
  5. Torrens, R. (1815). An Essay on the External Corn Trade. London: Brettell.
  6. Viner, J. (1937). Studies in the Theory of International Trade. New York: Harper and Brothers Publishers.
  7. Robbins, L. (1958). Robert Torrens and the Evolution of Classical Economics. London: Macmillan.
  8. Chipman, J. S. (1965). A Survey of the Theory of International Trade. Econometrica, 33(3), 477-519.
    Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1911748
  9. Schumpeter, J. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Ruffin, R. J. (2002). David Ricardo’s Discovery of Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy, 34(4), 727-748.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-34-4-727
  11. Ruffin, R. J. (2005). Debunking a Myth: Torrens on Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy, 37(4), 711-722.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-37-4-711
  12. Thweatt, W. O. (1976). James Mill and the Early Development of Comparative Advantage. History of Political Economy, 8(2), 207-234.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-8-2-207
  13. Rothbard, M. N. (1996). Classical Economics: An Austrian Perspective on the History of Economic Thought. Volume II. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
  14. Pullen, J. (2006). Did Ricardo Really Have a Law of Comparative Advantage? A Comparison of Ricardo’s Version and the Modern Version. History of Economics Review, 44(1), 59-75.
    Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=963276
  15. Gomes, L. (1987). Foreign trade and the national economy: mercantilist and classical perspectives. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  16. Grancay, M., & Szikorova, N. (2013). History of the principle of comparative advantage revisited: what makes a satisfactory definition? History of Economic Ideas, 21(3), 43-68.
  17. Torrens, R. (1826). An Essay on the External Corn Trade (3rd ed.). London: Brettell.
  18. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation. London: J. Murray.
  19. Maneschi, A. (1998). Comparative Advantage in International Trade: a Historical Perspective. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
  20. Boyd, H. (1795). The Indian Observer. Calcutta: Joseph Cooper.
  21. Anderson, W. (1769). The history of France, during the reigns of Francis II. and Charles IX. London: T. Cadell.
  22. [Anon.] (1789). Forms of prayer, for the use of a congregation of Protestant Dissenters, in Manchester. Birmingham: J. Thompson.
  23. Ferguson, A. (1792). Principles of moral and political science. Edinburgh: Greech.
  24. Duncan, A. (1790). Heads of lectures on the theory and practice of medicine. Edinburgh: Watson, Elder and Company.
  25. Hanway, J. (1781). Distributive justice and mercy. London: J. Dodsley.
  26. Norris, J. (1701). An essay towards the theory of the ideal or intelligible world. London: S. Manship.
  27. Jebb, F. (1731). Thoughts on the discontents of the people last year, respecting the sugar duties. Dublin: William Wilson.
  28. Bath and West of England Society (1780). Letters and papers on agriculture, planting, & c. Bath: R. Cruttwell.
  29. Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce (1788). Transactions of the Society, Instituted at London for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce. Vol VI. London: T. Wilkins.
  30. McCulloch, J. R. (1818). Contributions to the Edinburgh Review. [S.n.]: [s.l.].
  31. [Anon.] (1824, April 23). Ricardo Lecture. The Morning Chronicle.

Received 12.10.2014