Organization of management processes and principles of virtual production

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 147, Issue 1-2(1), Pages: 44-47

Citation information:
Arkhipkin, O., Leskova, T., & Korodyuk, I. (2015). Organization of management processes and principles of virtual production. Economic Annals-XXI, 1-2(1), 44-47. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v147-11/

 Oleg Arkhipkin
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Irkutsk State University
1 Karl Marks Str., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia
Arhipkin01@yandex.ru

Tatiana Leskova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Irkutsk State University of Railway Transport
15 Chernyshevsky Str., Irkutsk, 664074, Russia
tanya.leskova2015@yandex.ru

Igor Korodyuk
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Baikal State University of Economics and Law
11 Lenin Str., Irkutsk, 664003, Russia
corodyuck2015@yandex.ru

Organization of management processes and principles of virtual production

Abstract. Introduction. Quality of products or services is one of the key factors in generating the demand for product. The importance of this factor in development of an efficient competitive strategy of the enterprise, as well as in accomplishment of new competitive advantages in the industry is a criterion of primary significance for quality management system implementation. Purpose: to research organization of management processes and analyze principles of virtual production. Results. Methods of management processes organization and implementation of virtual technologies principles are reviewed. It is proven that transition to organization of technological processes on the basis of flexible automated production creates new opportunities to enhance efficiency of industrial production. Analysis of CALS-Technologies is provided. Conclusions. The outcomes of the study enabled the authors to formulate specific recommendations for: 1. effective application of different types of industrial automation, depending on the batch size and diversity of similar parts and mix of products; 2. successful implementation of the proposed technology of 3D-modeling as a basis for creating objects in CAD-systems; 3. justification the virtual CALS-technologies application.

Keywords: Production Management; Virtual Production; Process-based Approach; CALS-Technologies; Quality Management System; Competitive Advantage

JEL Classification: М11

References

1. Hassi, D. (2001). Strategy and Planning (Trans. from Eng.). St. Petersburg: Piter (in Rus.).
2. Vais, S. D. (2000). Methodology of Competitive Advantage Assessment of Metal-Cutting Tools. Design and Technology Information Science (pp. 90-93). Moscow: Stankin (in Russ.).
3. Azarov, V. N., & Laokhin, Yu. L. (2006). Integrated Information Systems of Quality Management. Moscow: Evrop. Centre po kachestvu (in Russ.).
4. Fakhfakh, T., Bartelmus, W., Chaari, F., & Zimroz, R. (Eds.). Condition Monitoring of Machinery in Non-Stationary Operations. Proceedings of the Second International Conference Condition Monitoring of Machinery in Non-Stationary Operations CMMNO’2012. Springer Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London.
5. Adams, M. L. (2010). Rotating Machinery Vibration: From Analysis to Troubleshooting (2^nd edition). CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
6. Pytkin, A. N., & Ponosova, A. N. (2013). The model of effective anti-crisis management of the industrial enterprise. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo (Journal of Russian Entrepreneurship), 6, 114-121 (in Russ.).
7. Antilles, N., & Li, K. (2007). Evaluation: analysis and forecasting using IFRS (Trans. from Eng.). Moscow: Alpina Biznes Buk (in Russ.).
8. Nechaev, A. S., Antipina, O. V., & Prokopyeva, A. V. (2014). The risk of innovation activities in enterprises. Life Science Journal (LSJ), 11(11), 574-575.
9. Staszewski, W. J. (2000). Wavelets for mechanical and structural damage identification. Gdansk: IMP-PAN.
10. Lontsykh, P. A. (2003). Quality Assurance and Dynamic Processes Management of Technological Systems. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov State University Publishing House (in Russ.).

Received 03.01.2015