Economic theory

Noosphere paradigm of economic development

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 8-11

Citation information:
Kutsenko, V. (2015). Noosphere paradigm of economic development. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 8-11. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-02/

View Full TextDownload PDF

Volodymyr Kutsenko
PhD (Technical Sciences),
Assistant Professor,
Dnipropetrovsk National University named after Oles Honchar
72 Gagarin Ave, Dnipropetrovsk, 49050, Ukraine
vladimirkutsenko@ua.fm

Noosphere paradigm of economic development

Abstract. Introduction. Almost nobody has managed to achieve lasting peace and harmony in society, sustainable (life-giving) development. It is the result of the fact that a person neglects his true spiritual and moral values of life and becomes more and more mercenary. It has led humanity into moral decline, impoverishment of the lower stratum of society, and, at the same time, business entities, national economies and the global economy – into a state of permanent polysystemic crisis. Purpose. To justify a noosphere way of managing through spiritual enlightenment of the human mind. Results. Sustainable (life-giving) development is not ensured by economic growth, especially through a permanent attraction of credits. Despite the amount of borrowed funds, they do not affect the value and sustainability of the economic effect. Most often, the long-term loans stimulate the cyclic operation of the enterprise with the frequency of fluctuations in the level of profit in 3-6 years. In that way, the mercantile way of managing leads to obsession. Therefore, life inspires to introduce the noosphere economy which will be managed by the enlightened economic executives. Conclusion. Sustainable development is achieved by the introduction of the noosphere economy concept: the mission of the enterprise – «the public good»; management principles – «the spiritual and moral unity of the labor collective, self-sufficiency including self-financing, complacency and peaceful cooperation with the international community»; management practices – the «classic doxography, patristics»; the purposes of economic activity – «the prerogative of social effect, the consequence of which is the economic effect»; ways to achieve the goal – «the economic executive enlightened by the Spirit of Truth who is inspired from above to make correct economic decisions». The true way to enlighten the mind is spiritual rebirth of a person who has purged his soul from the greed for money, through faith, hope and love for the Creator and neighbors.

Keywords: Noosphere Economy; Sustainable Development; Mission of Enterprise

JEL Classification: А13; P47; O12; В11

References

  1. The Bible. (1993). Moscow: The Russian Bible Society (in the Church Slavonic language).
  2. Tarasevich, V. N. (2012). Cyclicity and ethnogenesis in the evolution of the first civilizations. Vladimir Vernadsky and Lev Gumilev: Great Synthesis of creative heritage (376-390). Kostroma, Russia (in Rus.).
  3. Bilоrus, O. G. (2013). Post-industrial globalization system of the world or global noosphere economy? Economic Annals-XXI, 5-6(1), 100-101.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v129-27/ (in Ukr.)
  4. Nikitenko, P. G. (2006). Noosphere economics and social policy. Minsk: The Belarusian science (in Rus.).
  5. Subetto, A. I. (2009). Theoretical economy at the beginning of the XXI century – to the new grounds of synthesis of economics in the system of Noospherizm. St. Petersburg-Kostroma: Nekrasov Kostroma State University (in Rus.).
  6. Samarina, G. P. (2008) Noosphere economics: banking and financial system crises.
    Retrieved from http://idiinvest.narod.ru/Book/Book_Contents/Book_Contents.htm (in Rus.)
  7. Nemchin, A. M., Subetto, A. I., Suslov, E. Y. et al. (2006). Theoretical framework and methodology of social and economic management of Russia of the XXI century: the noosphere aspect. St. Petersburg: SPbGIPT (in Rus.).
  8. Kumanova, A. (2012). Universal humanitarian epistemological knowledge (Natural classification. International bibliography. The idea of the world’s cultural association) Vladimir Vernadsky and Lev Gumilev: Great creative heritage Synthesis (489-500). Kostroma, Russia (in Rus.).
  9. Kirsh D. (2004). Metacognition, distributed cognition and visual design. Cognition, education and communication technology (In P. Gardinfas, P. Johansson. Mahwah). N.J.: L. Erlbaum.
  10. Zeis, J. (2010). Evidentialism versus Faith. Social Epistemology, 24(1), 1-13.
  11. Kimmerle, J. et al. (2010). The interplay between individual and collective knowledge. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 8(1), 33-44.
  12. Carver, T. (1935). The essential factors of social evolution. Cambridge.
  13. Peccei, A. (1977). The Human Quality. Oxford; New York: «Pergamon Press».
  14. Goodland, R., Daly, H., & El Serafu, S. (Eds.). (1991). Environmentalyl Sustainable Economic Development. Building on Brundtland. Washington DC: World Bank.
  15. Coy, P. (2013). Look Who Bernanke Just Blamed for the Financial Crisis. Bloomberg Business.
    Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-07-11/look-who-bernanke-just-blamed-for-the-financial-crisis
  16. Vernadsky, V. I. (1967). Biosphere. Moscow: Thought (in Rus.).
  17. Vernadsky, V. I. (1944). A few words about the noosphere. The Successes of Modern Biology, 18(2), 113-120.
    Retrieved from http://vernadsky.lib.ru (in Rus.)
  18. Teilhard de Chardin, P. (1956). Le phenomene humain (Tome I). Paris: Les Editions du Seuil (in Frainch).
  19. Kutsenko, V. Y. (2012). The spiritual nature of loans and bankruptcy of the enterprise. Sotscialna ekonomika (Social Economy), 2-3, 91-105 (in Ukr.).

Received 27.02.2015

View Full TextDownload PDF
In, , , ,

More Papers