Public-private partnership potential in knowledge economy: regional aspect
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 28-31
Citation information:
Ivanov, Yu., & Tyshchenko, V. (2015). Public-private partnership potential in knowledge economy: regional aspect. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 28-31. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-07/
Yurii Ivanov
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
National Academy of Sciences
5 Freedom Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine
yuriy.ivanov.ua@gmail.com
Viktoriia Tyshchenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
9 Lenin Ave, Kharkiv, 61202, Ukraine
vf_hneu@ukr.net
Public-private partnership potential in knowledge economy: regional aspect
Abstract. The article gives the authors’ opinion about the determinants of knowledge-based economy development. A methodical approach to Ukrainian regions classification has been offered depending on the knowledge-based economy development level and public-private partnership potential. The differences between regions’ development have been considered and their elements have been grouped on the basis of regions in four clusters. The points within each cluster, the removal of which will ensure a balance between stimulating the most promising areas and state support for peripheral areas, have been identified. It is the basis for overcoming the economic and social inequality. It is proved that public-private partnerships can become an institute of accelerating development in direction of knowledge economy through the division of the state (public sector) and the multiplier effect of business (private sector).
Keywords: Knowledge-Based Economy; Public-Private Partnership; Integral Index; Innovations; Education; Information Communication Technologies
JEL Classification: E60
References
- Bell, D. (2004). The third technological revolution and its possible socio-eсonomy consequences. Mosсow: Academy (in Rus.).
- Kahn H., & Wiener, A. (1967). The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty Three Years. New York: Macmillan.
- Castells, M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Moscow: Knowledge (in Rus.).
- Schumpeter, J. (1982). Theory of Economic Development: A Study of business profits, capital, credit, interest and cycle conjuncture. Moscow: Progress (in Rus.).
- Semynozhenko, V. (2014). The Doctrine of Knowledge.
Retrieved from http://www.semynozhenko.net - Voronkova, A. (2012). Capacity building enterprise in knowledge economy. Luhansk: Kind of Knowledge (in Ukr.).
- Heiets, V. (2004). Nature of the transition process to knowledge economy. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economy of Ukraine), 4, 4-14 (in Ukr.).
- Fedulova, L., & Korneev, T. (2010). Features of knowledge economy in the modern phase of social development: theory and practice development in Ukraine. Actualni problemy economiky (Actual Problems of Economics), 4, 73-86.
- Akitoby, B., Hemming, R., & Schwartz, G. (2007). Public Investment and Public-Private.
Retrieved from http://www.imf.org - Amunz, D. (2005). Public-private partnership. Concessionary model of joint participation of the state and the private sector in the implementation of financial projects. Directory Cultural Institution, 12, 16-24 (in Rus.).
- Zapatrina, I. (2012). Prospects of using public mechanisms, partial-partnerships for infrastructure development in Ukraine. Demohrafia ta sotsialna ekonomika (Demography and Social Economy), 1(17), 94-102.
- Zeldner, A. (2010). Conceptual bases of formation and functioning of public-private partnerships. Moscow: Institute of Economics of RAN (in Rus.).
- Tyshchenko, V. (2013). Diagnosis vector of development of the knowledge economy: a regional perspective. Economic Annals-XXI, 9-10(1), 31-34.
Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v133-08/ (in Ukr.) - Tyshchenko, V. (2014). Forming the base system of indicators to assess the potential. Visnyk sotsialno-economichnyh doslidzen (Herald of Social and Economic Research), 1(52), 277-283 (in Ukr.).
Received 29.03.2015