Corporate social responsibility paradigm formation in Ukraine

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 60-63

Citation information:
Kuzheliev, M. (2015). Corporate social responsibility paradigm formation in Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 60-63. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-14/

Mykhailo Kuzheliev
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
National State Tax Service University of Ukraine
31 Universitetska Str., Irpin town, Kyiv Region, 08201, Ukraine
kuzheliev.kmo@donnu.edu.ua

Corporate social responsibility paradigm formation in Ukraine

Abstract. The national model of the corporate social responsibility formation radically changes the role of the corporation in terms of the economic system and it is the basic element of existed corporate relations. This presupposes transformation of the corporations in complex institution that is based on the social grounds. There are historical and transformation aspects of the corporate social responsibility paradigm formation in Ukraine. Model of A. Carroll as well as global trends of the corporate social responsibility model has been investigated. The result of the research is development of a cubic model of the corporate social responsibility and the main approaches to the formation of the national model of CSR that will solve a number of problems in the triangle «state – society – corporation» and increase the level of the corporate culture in Ukraine.

Keywords: Corporate Social Responsibility; Model of Corporate Social Responsibility; Stakeholders; Corporation

JEL Classіfіcatіon: G30; М14

References

1. Mians, G. (1962). The Corporate Revolution in America. New York: Economic Beality US Economic Theory.
2. Berle, A. A. (1963). The American Economic Republic. New York: Harcourt Brace & World.
3. Friedman, М. (1970, September). The Social Responsibility of Business is to increase its Profit. New York Times Magazine, 122-126.
4. Coser, L. (1968). Conflict: Social aspects International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences. New York: International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences.
5. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
6. Williams, C. A. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility in a Comparative Perspective: The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7. Jastram, S. (2007). The Link between Corporate Social Responsibility and Strategic Management. Hamburg: Centre of International Studies.
8. Sheremet, О. (2004). Improving corporate governance. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economy of Ukraine), 1, 33 (in Ukr.).
9. Dmytrychenko, L. I., & Khimchenko, A. M. et al. (2012). Corporate relations: research of methodology and mechanisms. Donetsk: Skhidnyi vydavnychyi dim (in Ukr.).
10. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003) Corporate social responsibility: A three- domain approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 503-530.
11. Kuzheliev M. O. (2012) Formation of national model of corporate social responsibility. Skhid (East), 2, 35-37 (in Ukr.).
12. Matten, D., Habish, A., Jonker, J., & Wegner, M. (Eds.) (2004). «Implicit» and «Explicit» CSR: A Conceptual Framework for Understanding CSR in Europe. CSR Across Europe.
13. EIU. Economist Intelligence Unit.
    Retrieved from http://www.eiu.com
14. Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. Development of a national standard on CSR.
    Retrieved from http://www.csr-ukraine.org (in Ukr.)

Received 20.02.2015