Pole cities: economic development enhancers and limits. Case of two Hungarian regional centres
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 97-100
Citation information:
Csete, M., & Szabo, M. (2015). Pole cities: economic development enhancers and limits. Case of two Hungarian regional centres. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 97-100. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-23/
Maria Csete
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
2 Magyar Tudosok Korutja Str., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary
csete@eik.bme.hu
Mariann Szabo
PhD Student,
Budapest University of Technology and Economics
2 Magyar Tudosok Korutja Str., Budapest, H-1117, Hungary
szabo_m@eik.bme.hu
Pole cities: economic development enhancers and limits. Case of two Hungarian regional centres
Abstract. Pecs and Szeged, two Hungarian Pole cities (refers to F. Perroux’s Growth Pole Theory) in the top-down initiative Hungarian Pole Programme are examined in this research. The Pole cities which have been appointed to the Programme are those regional centres of Hungary where significant public and private companies, chambers, civil organisations, municipalities, universities and R&D institutions operate.
The analysis carried out for years 2013-4014 has shown that the simulation of multiplier effects in the regions of the two cities was limited due to the relatively low level of the for-profit enterprises participation in the examined Programmes, limiting the increase of employees’ income level in the cities where Universities are the most influential factor in local economic development.
We conclude that the Pole Programme itself was not the ultimate victorious strategy to decrease the regional disparities in Hungary. In the near future, economic Programmes must focus on how the local industries can relate to other industries and through productive consumption enhance the regions’ well-being.
Keywords: Economic Development; Cohesion; Growth Models; Hungarian Pole Programme; Productive Consumption
JEL Classіfіcatіon: R00; R11
Acknowledgement. This paper was supported by the Janos Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.
References
- Csete, M., & Szabo, M. (2014). How the spatial distribution of the Hungarian TOP 500 companies affects regional development: an examination of income generation at subnational scale. Regional Statistics, 4(1), 40-60.
doi: https://doi.org/10.15196/RS04104 - Martin, R., & Sunley, P. (1998). Slow Convergence? The New Endogenous Growth Theory and Regional Development. Economic Geography, 74(3), 203-427.
Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org - Shera, A., & Meyer, D. (2013). Remittances and their impact on Economic Growth. Periodica Polytechnica, 21(1), 3-19.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.2152 - Costancza, R. (1991). Ecological Economics. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Daly, H. E. (1994). Operationalizing Sustainable Development by Investing in Natural Capital. In A. M. Jansson et al. (Eds.). Investing in Natural Capital (pp. 22-37). Washington: Island Press.
- Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2004). Limits to Growth: The 30-Year Update. Chelsea: Green Publishing Company.
- Szendro, G., Csete, M., & Torok, A. (2012a). Statistical analysis of the road vehicle fleet of Hungary from environmental aspects. Periodica Polytechnica 40(2), 95-98.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.tr.2012-2.09 - European Commission (n.d.). Regional policy: Territorial cohesion.
Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/what/cohesion/index_en.cfm - Halmai, P., & Vasary, V. (2012). Convergence crisis: economic crisis and convergence in the European Union. International Economics and Economic Policy, 9(3-4).
- European Commission (EC) – Eurostat (n.d.). GDP per capita in PPS.
Retrieved from http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu - Illes, I. (2009). Spatial development in Hungary in the 20th Century. Miskolc: MEK (in Hung.).
- Csete, M., Palvolgyi, T., & Szendro, G. (2013). Assessment of climate change vulnerability of tourism in Hungary. Regional Environmental Change, 13(5), 1043-1057.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-013-0417-7 - Csete, M., & Horvath, L. (2012). Sustainability and green development in urban policies and strategies. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 10(2), 185-194.
Retrieved from http://www.ecology.uni-corvinus.hu - Szendro, G., Csete, M., & Torok, A. (2014). The Sectoral Adaptive Capacity Index of Hungarian Road Transport. Periodica Polytechnica, 22(2), 99-106.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/PPso.7377 - D-maps.com (n.d.). Hungary: Magyar Koztarsasag boundaries, main cities, names (white).
Retrieved from http://d-maps.com/carte.php?num_car=3575&lang=en - Presenter, Bendo, Z. (2010, May). The Hungarian Pole Programme and Cluster Development Policy. Paper session presented at Clusters and international competitiveness of countries, regions and firms in the global economy – 25th Anniversary of the World Economy Research Institute, Warsaw.
Retrieved from http://ftp.sgh.waw.pl/aci/20100528/doc/pres/Bendo.pdf - Szendro, G., Csete, M., & Torok, A. (2012b). Unbridgeable Gap Between Transport Policy and Practice in Hungary. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20(2), 104-109.
- Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2013). County towns.
Retrieved from http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/regiok/veszpremmjv10.pdf (in Hung.). - Szabo, M. (2012). Assessment of Local Economic Development in two Hungarian regional centres (Pecs, Szeged). (Master’s thesis). Budapest University of Technology and Economics (in Hung.).
- HVG (2013, November). Companies in Hungary with the best sales performance (TOP 500 list). HVG Hetilap (HVG weekly), 45, 43-67 (in Hung.).
- Fur, A., & Csete, M. (2010). Modeling methodologies of synergic effects related to climate change and sustainable energy management. Periodica Polytechnica 18(1), 11-19.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3311/pp.so.2010-1.02 - Hungarian Government (n.d.). Search engine for funded projects.
Retrieved from http://palyazat.gov.hu/content/10814 (in Hung.).
Received 10.03.2015