The rule of successful state regulation of higher education development

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 149, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 117-120

Citation information:
Pochtovyuk, A. (2015). The rule of successful state regulation of higher education development. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(1), 117-120. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-28/

Andrii Pochtovyuk
PhD (Public Administration),
Kremenchuk National University named after Mykhailo Ostrohradskyi
3 Pushkin Boulevard, Kremenchuk, Poltava region, 39600, Ukraine
apochtovyuk@yandex.ru

The rule of successful state regulation of higher education development

Abstract. Introduction. Modern management in general, and in higher education, in particular, cannot be imagined without the program, strategy or doctrine, defining goals, objectives, ways, methods and forms of realization of its mission in society. The article presents understanding of the rules of successful state regulation of higher education in the era of knowledge economy. The rule is that the validity of doctrines, models, programs and policies of the national higher education depends on the extent to which they have the opportunity to state the individual, employers and higher education institutions to implement their own interests, taking into account the interests of each other.

Purpose of the paper is to clarify the rule of successful state regulation of higher education.

Methods. The methodological framework of governance reforms sphere of higher education is the logic of scientific knowledge realization of the mission of higher education in the knowledge economy. To clarify the rules state regulation used method dialectics of subjective and objective.

Results. Considering documents governments of Ukraine and the leading countries of the world educational space, it should be noted that there are many disparities in the consideration of the interests of all subjects of higher education. On average, most country’s attention is paying to the needs of the individual and the state in the interests of higher education institution is the third largest employer – at last. In the doctrine of UK and Western Europe can be traced most attempts to combine the interests of all subjects, but the interests of the university and the individual still prevail. The national educational doctrines of Ukraine, there are no questions concerning the problem of equal opportunities to quality higher education, learning the basic principles of behaviour in the social relations and especially in the labour market.

Conclusion. Summarizing the above considerations, it should be noted that the new theoretical, scientific and practical approach to management of higher education on the basis of the definition of the objects and interests of subjects Higher Education declared the need to aim at and choose activities aimed at balancing the interests of equivalent combinations of higher education sphere. These doctrines certain development indicators in higher education and ways to achieve them focused on the implementation of its higher mission. The mission is to satisfy the interests of subject’s sphere of higher education and, therefore, in these documents should be given the goals and methods to achieve each subject and the goals and methods consistent with other subjects on     higher education. This let you solve problems doctrines of reforming of higher education.

Keywords: Sphere of Higher Education; Subjects of Higher Education Sphere; Business Interests in Higher Education Sphere; National Doctrine of Higher Education Development; Model of Higher Education Development

JEL Classіfіcatіon: H11; I22; I28

References

1. Kraluk, P. (2012). Higher education in Ukraine, where are we going? Dzerkalo Tyzhnia. Ukraina (Mirror of the Week. Ukraine), 3, 12 (in Ukr.).
2. Readings, B. (1997). The University in ruins. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
3. Podmazin, S. (2006). Personality-oriented education (social and philosophical analysis). Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovsk National University (in Ukr.).
4. Pochtovyuk, A. (2014). Higher education: methodological foundations of rational management: a monograph. Kremenchuk: SVD Oleksiyenko V. V. (in Ukr.).
5. Bok, D. (2012). Universities in market conditions. Мoscow: Publishing House of The Higher School of Economics (in Rus.).
6. Pochtovyuk, A., & Zagirnyak, M. (2011). Management of competitiveness of higher education institutions: current trends. Humanitarni ta socialno-economichni nauky (Humanitarian and Socio-Economic Sciences), 2(57), 130-134 (in Ukr.).
7. Department of Education (1991, May). America 2000: An Education Strategy. ED / OS91-13. Washington DC.
8. Kratt, O., & Deeva, L. (2008). Trends in the Higher School Search: causal relationships. Economica rozvytky (Economics of Development), 2(46), 41-44 (in Ukr.).
9. Higher Education Opportunity Act (2008, Aug. 14). Public law, 110-315.
10. Shattock, M. (2003). Managing Successful Universities. Open University Press.
11. University guide 2011 (June 2010). University league table.
    Retrieved from http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/table/2010/jun/04/university-league-table
12. The Education Reform Act (1988). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, Reprinted (1989). London.
    Retrieved from http://www.educationengland.org.uk
13. Success for all: reforming further education and training: discussion document (2002). Great Britain: Department for Education and Skills.

Received 11.02.2015