Parameters of quality forming in modern audit practice

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 150, Issue 3-4(2), Pages: 63-66

Citation information:
Vasyliuk, M., & Hryhoriv, O. (2015). Parameters of quality forming in modern audit practice. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(2), 63-66. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v150-15/

Maria Vasyliuk
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Precarpathian National University named after Vasyl Stefanyk
57 Shevchenko Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
v.mariya69@mail.ru

Olga Hryhoriv
PhD (Economics),
Senior Lecturer,
Precarpathian National University named after Vasyl Stefanyk
57 Shevchenko Str., Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018, Ukraine
olga_grygoriv@ukr.net

Parameters of quality forming in modern audit practice

Abstract. Introduction. The functioning of the national economy in a demanding and dynamic market space requires a revision of the new approach in solving problems of interrelation of auditing firms and users of information to form an effective quality management system audit services. To implement this task can be subject to review of a conceptual approach to quality management assurance services. Purpose. Research issues of quality control services in the current context of auditing practices and the implementation of quality control of audit services in Ukraine, identifying areas of quality improvement of professional audit services, produce proposals to ensure the conditions for the development of optimal model of market regulation of auditing services.

Results. However, reducing the scientific value of the results obtained, we can state the fact today that neither the concept of quality assurance does not explain reasons for the existence of a discrepancy between the provision of «technology» for quality assurance, which meets the requirements of the established standards and the quality of the final result, which has to meet the ultimate goal is to reduce the information risk recipients to audit services.

Conclusion. Our studies allow to conclude that the optimal model of market regulation of audit services is possible through dialogue of representatives of State regulators and public organizations of the Auditors. As an option, you may want to consider creating a State system of public oversight of Auditors and audit firms, as well as the involvement of NGOs the Auditors to perform regulatory functions by the formation of Audit Chamber of Ukraine. To improve the professional regulation of audit findings prove that the main directions of improving the regulation of audit in Ukraine to establish compliance with the requirements of European legislation must be clearly delineated system of public oversight of auditing activity, increasing responsibility of the Auditors for the results of the audit of public interest entities, increasing audit requirements, strengthening quality control of professional audit services.

Keywords: Quality; Quality Audit; Quality Control System; Audit Activities; Audit Services

JEL Classification: M40; M41; M49

References

1. Adams, R. (1995). Basics audit. In Y. V. Sokolova (Ed.). (Trans. from English Y. A. Arienko). Moscow: Audit (in Russ.).
2. Ahrens, E. L., & Lobbek, J. K. (1995). Audit. In Y. V. Sokolova (Ed.). (Trans. from English). Moscow: Finance and statistics (in Russ.).
3. Glichev, A. V., & Kruglov, M. I. (2000). Quality management. Moscow: Economics (in Rus.).
4. Juran, D. (2001). All about quality: All foreign experience (Issue 2). The highest level of leadership and quality. Moscow. (in Russ.).
5. Dodge, R. (1992). A brief guide to the standards and norms of audit. (Trans. from English S. A. Stukau). Moscow: Finance and statistics (in Russ.).
6. Law of Ukraine (1993). About auditing activity.
   Retrieved from http://zakon.rada.gov.ua/cgi-bin/laws/main.cgi?nreg=3125-12
7. Kalita, P. (1996). Systems quality and international standards ISO series 9000. Кyiv: Ukrainian Association for quality (in Ukr.).
8. Carmichael, D. R., & Denis, M. (1995). Audit standards and norms. (Trans. from English). Moscow. (in Russ.).
9. Krylova, G. D. (2004). Foreign experience in quality management. Moscow: Publishing standards (in Russ.).
10. Makeeva, O. (2010). Public supervision in audit: Challenges for Ukraine and the future strategic decisions of the European Commission. Accounting and auditing, 12, 44-49 (in Ukr.).
11. International standards on auditing, assurance and ethics (2006). (Edition 2006). (Trans. from English O. V. Seleznyov, O. L. Olhovikova, O. V. Ick, T. C. Sharashidze, L. J. Urkivska, O. Kulikov). Кyiv. (in Ukr.).
12. Redko, O. (2002). Audit in Ukraine: independent, unattended, formal, «motor». Retrieved from http://www.kontrakty.com.ua/ukr/gc/nomer/2002/16/8.html  (in Russ.)
13. Shalimov, N. S. (2009). Conceptual approaches to the definition of quality audit Actual problems of economics, 5, 237-248 (in Ukr.).
14. Principles for Auditor Oversight. A Statement of the Technical Committee of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. (2002).
    Retrieved from http://www.iasplus.com/iosco/iosco3.pdf

Received 12.03.2015