Mechanisms of regulatory policy application in agriculture

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 151, Issue 5-6, Pages: 53-56

Citation information:
Vdovenko, N. (2015). Mechanisms of regulatory policy application in agriculture. Economic Annals-XXI, 5-6, 53-56. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v151-13/

Nataliia Vdovenko
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Head of Global Economy Department,
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine
nata0409@gmail.com

Mechanisms of regulatory policy application in agriculture

Abstract. Introduction. In modern conditions, forms, methods, and means of regulatory policy for agriculture development should be implemented according to the existing international approaches. State regulatory policies in different branches of agriculture should be aimed at developmental constraints elimination.

Purpose. To ground actual approaches to regulatory policy in prospective agrarian sector branches connected with the foodstuff and work out practical recommendations on application of regulatory policy mechanisms in the aquaculture sector.

Results and Conclusion. The prominent feature of aquaculture is a specific nature of the object of manufacture – the fish which is grown in conditions, supervised by the humans. To fully use this advantage and provide regulatory support for this type of economic activity development, the following preconditions should be preserved: water objects fish capacity increase from 3.0 centner/hectare to 15.0 centner/hectare; certification of the leased fish farming technological reservoirs. We see the expediency to optimize not only the account of aquaculture zones, but also of soils, where reservoirs are located, with use of correction coefficient depending on the levels of soil fertility. Feeding ponds have to be divided into categories (channel, waste, by area). It is necessary to provide indicators of fish capacity both for commodity fish and for a stocking material. The central regulatory authority provides complex regulatory policy in the sphere of fisheries and is given the right to provide the state account, monitoring, the state cadastre of water bio-resources managing, and the state account and the register of fish farming water bodies (or their parts). Nowadays, its main priority should be development and further implementation of an order the state register of the fish farming water objects (or their parts) conducting.

Keywords: Agriculture; Aquaculture; Regulatory Policy; Passportization; Soil Fertility Coefficient

JEL Classification: A13; В21; D23; D20

Referenсes

1. Bodrov, V. (2010). State regulation of the economy and economic policy: teach. guidances. Kiev: Akademvydav, 520.
2. Sabluk, P. (2008). Pricing and regulatory costs in agriculture (theory, methodology, practice). Kiev: NSC IAE, 697.
3. Kachnyi, A. (2009). State as a governing body and regulation of fisheries. Scientific Bulletin of the Academy of Municipal Management: Coll Science. Works, 4, 209.
4. Kvasha, S., & Vdovenko, N. M. (2013). Guidelines for the possibility of functioning public-private partnership in the fishing industry. Kiev: Vitas Ltd, 70.
5. Lupenko, Y. (2012). Strategic Direction of Agriculture of Ukraine for the period 2020. Kiev: NSC IAE, 182.
6. Lukinov, I. (1997). Economic Transformation (late twentieth century). Kiev: IN NASU, 455
7. Lukinov, I. (2007). Selected Works. Kiev: NSC IAE, 816.
8. Galbraith, J. (2004). New Industrial State. Moscow: AST, 602.
9. Coase, R. (2007). Federal Politics in communication. Economic politic, 3, 146.
10. Quesnay, F. (2008). Favourites Economic Works. Moscow: Dyrektmedya Pablyshynh, 538.
11. Smith, A. (2007). Investigation of nature and causes of wealth peoples. Moscow: Eksmo, 960.
12. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1960). Capital. Moscow: Hospolytyzdat, 790.
13. Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1961). Capital. Moscow: Hospolytyzdat, 490.
14. Marx, K. (1961). Capital. Criticism of political economy. Moscow: Hospolytyzdat, 460.
15. Schumpeter, J. (1982). Theory of Economic Development (Study of business profits, capital, credit, interest and cycle conditions). Moscow: Progress, 455.
16. Hayek, F. (1992). Fatal conceit. Errors of Socialism. Moscow: News, 304.
17. Kozyryatskaya, Ya. (2007). State regulation and support enterprises economy in terms of the market. Scientists note Taurida National University named after V. I. Vernadsky, 79.
18. Simon, G. (2001). Administrative Behaviour: A Study of decision making in organizations that perform administrative functions. Kiev: Artek, 392.
19. Тhe Law of Ukraine (2012). «About aquaculture». Official Bulletin of Ukraine, 79, 26-38.
20. Law of Ukraine (2011). «On fisheries, commercial fisheries and the protection of aquatic biological resources», Official Herald of Ukraine, 59.
21. Law of Ukraine (1990). № 400-XII On the priority of social development of rural areas and agriculture in the national economy. Supreme Council of Ukraine News, 45, 602.

Received 07.04.2015