Approaches to enterprises’ financial and economic security management
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 152, Issue 7-8(1), Pages: 54-57
Citation information:
Moskalenko, N., Romanenko, O., & Oliinyk, T. (2015). Approaches to enterprises’ financial and economic security management. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8(1), 54-57. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v152-13/
Natalia Moskalenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
9 Lenin Ave, Kharkiv, 61001, Ukraine
nata_moskalenko@mail.ru
Olha Romanenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
9 Lenin Ave, Kharkiv, 61001, Ukraine
romanenko.consult@gmail.com
Tetiana Oliinyk
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkiv National University of Economics
9 Lenin Ave, Kharkiv, 61001, Ukraine
rudik-13-13@mail.ru
Approaches to enterprises’ financial and economic security management
Abstract. In relation to management of financial and economic security, it is very important to follow certain rules and approaches that will help to build this system, and to avoid possible risks of ineffective activities of an enterprise. Therefore, we focus on issues that provide orderliness, rationality and validity of such a complex function as management of financial and economic security of an enterprise. Primarily, this is due to the measurement of both management processes and outcomes, standardization of management activity and coordination of corporate interests. The article presents the standards that can be used to provide company’s financial and economic security and typical problems that may lead to conflicts of interest in corporate management.
Keywords: Financial and Economic Security; Security Management; Measurement; Standardization; Corporate Interests
JEL Classification: M21; L15
References
- Davidson, M. (2012). Managing Risk across the Enterprise.
Retrieved from http://www.securitymanagement.com/article/managing-risk-across-the-enterprise-005823 - Petersen, K. (2013). The Corporate Security Professional: A hybrid agent between corporate and national security. Security Journal, 26, 222-235.
- Ridley, G. (2011). National Security as a Corporate Social Responsibility: Critical Infrastructure Resilience. Journal of Business Ethics, 103(1), 11-125.
- Kaplan, Robert S. (2003). The Balanced scorecard. From strategy to action. Moscow: Olimp-Business. (in Russ.).
- Pricewaterhouse Coopers (2015). Guide to key performance indicators.
Retrieved from http://www.pwc.com/gx/en/audit-services/corporate-reporting/assets/pdfs/
UK_KPI_guide.pdf - Sewell, K. (2008). Customers for life. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (in Russ.).
- Panov, M. (2012). The Evaluation of activity and the system of company management based on KPI. Moscow: INFRA-M (in Russ.).
- Liber, D. (2015). Do’s and Don’ts: Security Management in a Growing Company.
Retrieved from http://securityintelligence.com - Adizes, I. (2012). Managing Corporate Life Cycles. Adizes Institute Publications.
- The official website of international company of certification «Bureau Veritas».
Retrieved from http://www.bureauveritas.com.ua (in Ukr.) - Institute of Ethics and Social Reporting «Account Аbility». Official website. Retrieved from http://www.accountability.org/standards/index.html (in Ukr.)
- Grytsyshen, D., & Dikaya, E. (2011). Social and environmental obligations in the reporting system of sustainable development: peculiarities of application of the AA1000. Visnyk ZhDTU (Herald of Zhytomyr State Technological University), 33(57), 42-45 (in Russ.).
- Saprykina, M. (2011). The dialogue with stakeholders: recommendations to companies. Kyiv: LLC «Farbovanyy list» (in Ukr.).
- Popov, S., & Fomina, L. (2013). From the theory of stakeholders to the implementation of the concept of shared values. Rossiyskoe predprinimatelstvo (Russian Entrepreneurship), 2(224), 60-65 (in Russ.).
- Rudyk, N. (2004). Structure of corporation capital: theory and practice. Moscow: Delo (in Russ.).
Received 16.07.2015