Methodology of small production enterprises’ marketing on the example of the food industry enterprise: product quality aspect

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 153, Issue 7-8(2), Pages: 27-31

Citation information:
Lutsiak, V. (2015). Methodology of small production enterprises’ marketing on the example of the food industry enterprise: product quality aspect. Economic Annals-XXI, 7-8(2), 27-31. https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v153-07/


Vitalii Lutsiak
PhD (Technical Sciences),
Senior Scientific Fellow,
D.Sc. Student,
National University of Food Technologies
68, Volodymyrska Str., Kyiv, 01601, Ukraine
Lutsiak_Vitalii@i.ua

Methodology of small production enterprises’ marketing on the example of the food industry enterprise: product quality aspect

Abstract. Introduction. Development of fundamental marketing methodology is a key problematic aspect of work of small production enterprises in view of their strengths as well as modern marketing activity techniques adapting for performance at specific production fields and economic activities. Therefore, the objectives of this paper are to analyse current conceptual approaches that form a theoretical and practical background for marketing activities of a small production enterprise and development of quality function deployment in view of correlation between a marketing-mix and primary production. Materials and methods. The results were obtained using dynamic capabilities concept at an enterprise; summarizing method was applied to estimate the role of innovative capacity for activities of small production enterprises and the meaning of quality for competition; the marketing models of goods were used as well as the customer’s psychological behaviour pattern in development of the marketing-mix and the quality function deployment technique. Results. As a result of the research, the principles of marketing methodology of a small production enterprise have been theoretically proved. Due to the development of quality function deployment technique, the possibility to obtain a correlation between a complex of organizational marketing and primary production has been practically shown by the example of chosen food industry enterprise. Conclusions and proposals. Practical aspect of the proposed methodology usage is to specify methods of characteristics selecting that are used in the process of quality function deployment, aimed at providing product quality and meeting the needs of customers in different industrial branches.

Keywords: Small Enterprise; Production Enterprise; Marketing; Methodology; Dynamic Capabilities; Innovation; Quality; Quality Function Deployment

JEL Classification: L2; L15; M3; O31

References

  1. McCarthy, E. J. (1960). Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.
  2. Kotler, P. (1988). Marketing Management: Analysis Planning and Control. Prentice-Hall.
  3. Kotler, P. (2006). Marketing Management. Express Course. St. Petersburg: Peter (in Russ.).
  4. Minette, S. (2003). Industrial marketing: a fundamentally new approach to solving marketing problems. Moscow: Publishing House «Williams» (in Russ.).
  5. Teece, D. J. (2009). Identification of dynamic capabilities: the nature and micro-foundations (resistant) results of the company. Russian Management Journal, 7(4), 59-108 (in Russ.).
  6. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments. Academy of Management Journal, 32(3), 543-576.
  7. Schumpeter, J. (1982). The Theory of Economic Development. The study of business profits, capital, credit, interest and cycle conjuncture. Moscow: Progress (in Russ.).
  8. Schumpeter, J. A. (2009). There is still time to stop inflation. In Clemence, R.V. (Ed). Essays: on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles, and the evolution of capitalism (pp. 241-252). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Books.
  9. Fedulova, I. V. (2010). The innovative potential of the enterprise. Kyiv: MTSV «Medinform» (in Ukr.).
  10. Mayer, B. O. (2011). Value hierarchy of consumer choice and gender differences. Bulletin of the Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 4, 23-50 (in Russ.).
  11. Etzioni, A. (1988). Economics; Social choice; Paradigms (Social sciences). New York and London: George Washington University, Free Press.
  12. Akao, Y. (1972). New Product Development and Quality Assurance – Quality Deployment System. Standardization and Quality Control, 25(4), 7-14 (in Japanese).
  13. Ishikawa, K. (1988). Japanese methods of quality management. In Hlychev, A. V. (Ed.). Moscow: Economics (in Russ.).
  14. Fatkhutdinov, R. A. (2000). Competitiveness: economics, strategy, management. Moscow: INFRA-M (in Russ.).

Received 25.08.2015