Contemporary Russia as a palace-neopolitar state and economy
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 156, Issue 1-2, Pages: 4-8
Citation information:
Piliaiev, I. (2016). Contemporary Russia as a palace-neopolitar state and economy. Economic Annals-XXI, 156(1-2), 4-8. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0001
Igor Piliaiev
D.Sc. (Political Science),
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Professor of the
Interregional Academy of Personnel Management
2 Frometivska Str., Kyiv, 03039, Ukraine
igor.piliaiev@gmail.com
Contemporary Russia as a palace-neopolitar state and economy
Abstract. In the context of the apparent failure of Russia’s attempt to modernise itself during the post-communist period of its being, one of the actual tasks for social sciences is to identify the nature of the state and the economic system of contemporary Russia as well as historically determined dominants of its development in the foreseeable future. The article offers to solve that task through an inter-disciplinary junction of most relevant concepts of the politar/neopolitar economy, studying the Horde genesis of Muscovy-Russia, its political and historical notions of the «palace state».
The Putin Russia’s historical roots are traced from early class politar societies of Asia and Aegeide, especially the Cretan «palace» states all through the 2nd millennium BC, through the post-Horde Muscovy and the post-Petrine Russian state «privatised» by nobility, up to a number of communist and oligarchic dictatorships of the 20th century. The mechanisms of a large-scale redistribution of assets accumulated in power-property of Russia’s ruling elite are outlined through the case study of the RUSNANO state-owned company specialising in nanotechnologies. In contrast to the present day Ukrainian economy (being predominantly neo-feudal but with a dynamically developing segment of capitalist relations of the European type), in Russia under Putin one can observe the phenomenon of two-tier property, which is characteristic of politar societies, i.e. while this property is officially registered in the name of legal entities and individuals, its supreme owner and arbiter is actually the top-brass of the federal bureaucracy acting on behalf of the entire ruling class.
Thus, the socio-political and economic system of contemporary Russia may be identified as palace-neopolitar, wherein the top bureaucratic oligarchy has usurped power controlling and redistributing, the core economic resources and assets of the country with the purpose of its own utmost enrichment. Moreover, due to the escalation of the systemic conflict of Russia with the West and, more broadly, with the world of modernity, further consolidation of the palace-neopolitar power and economy, which brings under control and increasingly distorts the segment of competitive market relations, is taking place. The above means that the unlikely success of today’s Russian modernisation would threaten the very foundations of the Russian statehood.
Keywords: Power-property; Palace State; Horde; Russian Federation; RUSNANO
JEL Classification: H11; L32; P26; P27
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0001
References
- Muller, K. (1998). Postsozialistische Krisen. Im K. Muller (Hg.), Postsozialistische Krisen: Theoretische Ansatze und empirische Befunde. Opladen: Leske + Budrich (in German).
- Wittfogel, K. A. (1957). Oriental despotism. A comparative study of total power. New Haven: Yale University Press – London: Oxford University Press.
- Shafarevich, I. (1980). The socialist phenomenon / Transl. from Russian by William Tjalsma. Forew. by Aleksandr I. Solzhenitsyn. New York: Harper & Row.
- Semenov, Y. I. (2008). The Politar («Asiatic») Mode of Production: The Essence and the Place in the History of Mankind and Russia. Moscow: Volshebnyi Kliuch (in Russ.).
- Vasilyev, L. S. (1993). Traditional Orient and Marxist Socialism. In: N. A. Ivanov (Chief Ed.), The Phenomenon of Oriental Despotism. Moscow: Nauka (in Russ.).
- Krymskyi, S. B., & Pavlenko, Y. V. (2002). Invariants of the Civilizational Process. In: Y. N. Pakhomov (Ed.), Civilizational Models of the Present and their Historical Roots. Kyiv: Naukova Dumka (in Russ.).
- Pipes, R. (1993). Russia under the Old Regime. Translated from English by V. Kozlovskiy. Moscow: Nezavisimaya Gazeta (in Russ.).
- Zubov, A. B. (2011) Russia: Continuation of the History? Politeia, 62(3), 22-33 (in Russ.).
- Wallerstein, I. (1996). Historical Capitalism with Capitalist Civilization. London: Verso.
- Shlapentokh, V. (2007). Contemporary Russia as a Feudal Society. A New Perspective on the Post-Soviet Era. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Inozemtsev, V. L. (2011, March 1). Neo-Feudalism Explained. The American Interest, 4(6).
Retrieved from http://www.the-american-interest.com/2011/03/01/neo-feudalism-explained - Kyrchanov, M. (2015). The neo-feudalism theory in the context of contemporary economic neo-Marxism. Ekonomicnij Casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 5-6, 4-7.
doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0001 - Glebova, I. I. (2011) «The Palace»: How the State in Russia Was «Reorganized» (I). Politeia, 61(2), 60-84 (in Russ.).
- Glebova, I. I. «The Palace»: How the State in Russia Was «Reorganized» (II). Politeia, 62(3), 70-91 (in Russ.).
- Klyuchevsky, V. O. (1989). Lecture LXXIV. The Coup of June 28, 1762. In V. L. Yanin (Ed.). Klyuchevsky, V. O. Works in 9 Volumes. Vol. 4. A Course in Russian History. Moscow: Mysl (in Russ.).
- Voloshin, M. A. (1982) Poem «Russia». In B. A. Filippov, G. P. Struve, & N. A. Struve (Eds.), Voloshin, M. A. Poems. Volume 1 Paris: YMCA-PRESS (in Russ.).
- Kulpin, E. S. (2008). The Formation of the System of Core Values of the Russian Civilization. Istoriya i Sovremennost (History and Modernity), 1, 49-75 (in Russ.).
- Pasko, Y. I. (2005). The European Civilizational Antinomies: Dimensions of Globalization. Multiversum. A Philosophical Miscellany, 45.
Retrieved from http://www.filosof.com.ua/Jornel/M_45/Pasko.htm (in Ukr.) - Holovatyi, M. (2015). The state and society: the conceptual foundations and social interaction in the context of formation and functioning of states. Ekonomicnij Casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 9-10, 4-8.
Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v154-01/ - Tarasov, A. (2011, February 25). «The Second Edition of Capitalism» in Russia. Skepsis.
Retrieved from http://www.scepsis.ru/library/id_2973.html (in Russ.) - Weber, M. (1990). The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. In M. Weber. Selected Works. Translated from German Moscow: Progress (in Rus.).
- Bardhan, P. (1998). The Political Economy of Development in India. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
- Piliaiev, I. S. (2014). Conflictogenic Potential of the Russian Conservative Discourse in the Context of the Democratization and Globalization Challenges. In A. I. Kudryachenko (Ed.). Topical Issues of World History: Conflicts as a Constituent of Development of International Relations: Collection of Research Papers. Kyiv: Feniks (in Ukr.).
- Pavlenko, Y. V. (2002). Chapter II. The Stages, Ways, and Historical Types of the Civilizational Process Realization. In Y. N. Pakhomov (Ed.). Civilizational Models of the Present and their Historical Roots Kyiv: Naukova Dumka (in Russ.).
- Smith, G. B. (1996). Reforming the Russian legal system. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Treuil, R., Darcque, P., Poursat, J.-C., & Touchais, G. (2008). Les civilizations egeennes du neolithique et de l‘age du bronze. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France (in French).
- Glebova, I. (2015, September 25). Palace as a Metaphor of the Russian State. From the Soviet System to the Post-Soviet One: Upper and Lower Strata in their Relationship. Nezavisimaya Gazeta (The Independent Newspaper).
Retrieved from http://www.ng.ru/ideas/2015-09-25/5_ideas.html (in Russ.) - Bakhov I. S. (2014). Dialogue of Cultures in Multicultural Education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29(1), 106-109.
doi: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2014.29.01.13775 - Neschadin, A., Kuznetsov, O., & Kashin, V. (2007, June 4). Sovereign Economy (the Analytical Report). Moscow: Science Endowment Fund «Expert Institute».
Retrieved from http://viperson.ru/articles/andrey-neschadin-suverennaya-ekonomika-analiticheskiy-doklad (in Russ.) - Kuznetsov, A. (2015, December 18). Western Mass Media Noticed Lack of Enthusiasm in Putin at a Press Conference. RBK.
Retrieved from http://www.rbc.ru/politics/18/12/2015/5673ce039a79472ae34783ed?utm_source=newsmail&utm_medium=news&utm_campaign=news_mail1 (in Russ.) - ROSNANO (RUSNANO). (2010). Annual Report of State Corporation «Rusnanotech» for 2009. Moscow: ROSNANO (in Russ.).
- RUSNANO (ROSNANO) Group (2015, December 27). Investment Activities.
Retrieved from http://www.rusnano.com/investment (in Russ.) - ROSNANO (RUSNANO) Group. (2016, January 25). Board of Directors of OJSC RUSNANO.
Retrieved from http://www.rusnano.com/about/structure/sd (in Russ.) - Blavatnik, L. (2015, December 16). Lenta.ru.
Retrieved from http://lenta.ru/lib/14166566 (in Russ.) - Falyakhov, R. (2013, April 27). Chubais Invested in Bankrupts. Gazeta.ru.
Retrieved from http://www.gazeta.ru/business/2013/04/26/5281865.shtml (in Russ.) - ROSNANO (RUSNANO) Group. (2016, January 25). Results of the Meeting of the Board of Directors of OJSC RUSNANO on December 14, 2015.
Retrieved from http://www.rusnano.com/about/press-centre/news/20151214-rosnano-itogi-zasedaniya-soveta-direktorov (in Russ.) - Molotov, I. (2016, January 13). The Salaries of Miller and Co Will Be Cut. Russkaya Planeta (The Russian Planet).
Retrieved from http://rusplt.ru/society/milleru-i-ko-sokratyat-zarplatyi-20754.html (in Russ.) - Federal State Statistics Service of the Russian Federation. (2015, May 28). The Consolidated Budget of the Russian Federation and the Budgets of the Public Non-Budgetary Funds in 2014.
Retrieved from http://www.gks.ru/free_doc/new_site/finans/fin21.htm (in Russ.) - The Central Statistical Committee of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Russian Empire (2015). The Statistical Yearbook of Russia. 1914: Finance and Credit. Petrograd: The 12th Department, 166 pp. (in Russ.).
Received 11.02.2016