Inequality in social standard of living in the international context

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 157, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 15-18

Citation information:
Polozhentseva, Yu. (2016). Inequality in social standard of living in the international context. Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4(1)), 15-18. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0004

Yulia Polozhentseva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Regional Economics and Management Department,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
polojenceva84@mail.ru

Inequality in social standard of living in the international context

Abstract. Socio-economic development of each country depends on the most important factor of economic growth, i.e. human capital. The problems of effective human capital functioning and development is intimately connected with social standard of living which is the main indicator of both social, economic and political well-being of any country. At the present stage of the development of global socio-economic system, achieving a high or acceptable standard of living is a priority for the developed world economies. At the same time, trying to solve the problems of economic growth developing countries do not make effective decisions to reduce social inequalities in living standard. Thus, studying the issues of inequality in living standard remains relevant in terms of specifying objectives, directions, and selection of social policy scope and activities. The article presents methodical guidelines to address the issues of measuring inequalities in social standard of living, which, in today’s globalized world, are indicators reflecting the relationship between economic growth and social balance in the society. To do this, it is proposed to use the indicators characterizing human development and social benefits received by the population. The comparative analysis of the countries has been substantiated. It gives an opportunity to structure the main factors affecting the social standard of living and to synthesize these factors’ unevenness. Both world country ranking of social standard of living in terms of its main indicators, the reasons of inequalities in social standard of living and the basic mechanisms of effective social policy developing have been analyzed.

Keywords: Standard of Living; Social Inequality; Human Development Index; Human Capital

JEL Сlassіfіcatіon: D31; F20; O40

Acknowledgment. The study was performed as a part of the state order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No 26.2671.2014 «Theoretical and Methodological Basics of the Development and Implementations of Cluster Policy at Regional Level and Scientific and Procedural Substantiation of the Tools for Progressive Structural Transformations of Regional Social and Economic Systems».

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0004

References

1. Pigou, A. C. (1932). The Economics of Welfare (4^th ed.), London: Macmillan and Co.
2. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. N.Y.: Basic Books.
3. Miller, D. (1999). Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
4. Swift, A., & Marshall, G. (1997). Meritocratic Equality of Opportunity: Economic Efficiency, Social Justice, or Both? Policy Studies, 18, 35-48.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01442879708423720
5. Poterba, J. (1989). Lifetime Incidence and the distributional burden of excise taxes. American Economic Review, 79, 325-330.
   Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1827779
6. Slesnick, D. (1993). Gaining ground: poverty in the postwar United States. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 1-38.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/261864
7. Cutler, D., & Katz, L. (1992). Rising Inequality? Changes in the distribution of income and consumption in the 1980’s. American Economic Review, 82, 546-551.
   Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2117459
8. Meyer, B., &Sullivan, J. (2003). Measuring the Well-Being of the Poor Using Income and Consumption. Journal of Human Resources, 38, 1180-1220.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w9760
9. Becker, G. S., & Tomes, N. (1986). Human Capital and the Rise and Fall of Families. Journal of Labor Economics, 4(3), Part 2: The Family and the Distribution of Economic Rewards, 1-39.
   Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2534952
10. Ayvazyan, S. A. (2001). Cross-country analysis of the categories of integrated quality of life. Moscow: CEMI (in Russ.).
11. Bestuzhev-Lada, I. V. (1979). Theoretical and methodological problems of the studies have lifestyle. Moscow (in Russ.).
12. Lvov, D. S. (2005). The New Economic Policy in Russia should be socially equitable and moral. Economics of agricultural and processing enterprises, 6, 11-14 (in Russ.).
13. Fila, M., & Juranova, K. (2015). Human capital management: evaluation of selected unemployment aspects Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 3-4(1), 105-108.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v149-25/
14. Vertakova, Yu., Polozhentseva, Yu., Plotnikov, V., & Isaev, M. (2015) Directions of Human Potential Development in Russia. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 495-500.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00543-2
15. Plotnikov, V., Vertakova, Yu., & Polozhentseva, Yu. (2015). Methods of detecting imbalances in the structure and dynamics of socio-economic system Political sciences, law, finance, economics and tourism: finance, economics and tourism, 2, 821-828.
16. Human Development Report (2015). Work for Human Development.
    Retrieved from http://hdr.undp.org
17. Vertakova, Yu. V., Ershova, I. G., & Plotnikov, V. A. (2013). Educational System Influence on Knowledge Economy Formation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 27(5), 679-683.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.27.05.13692
18. Klevtsova, M. G., & Polozhentseva, Yu. S. (2013). Assessment of the socio-economic polarization areas of the region: the maximum element method. Izvestiya Yugo-zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Southwest State University Bulletin), 4(49), 21-26 (in Russ.).

Received 11.02.2016