Main features of freelancing as a non-standard form of employment

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 157, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 79-81

Citation information:
Grimov, O. (2016). Main features of freelancing as a non-standard form of employment. Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4(1)), 79-81. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0024


Oleg Grimov
PhD (Sociology),
Lecturer,
Department of Philosophy and Sociology,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
grimoleg@yandex.ru

Main features of freelancing as a non-standard form of employment

Abstract. The article is devoted to socio-economic and socio-cultural nature of freelance as one of the most widespread non-typical form of employment in the context of informational network economics creation and transformation of attitude to life. The author has examined freelance as a realization of freedom, independence, creativity and non-standardization in labour activity. Freelance is considered as the remote operations with part-time and contractual employment which forms nonlinear trajectory of career and special ways of social mobility.

The author has established connection of flexible and dynamic features of freelance with social adaptation of pensioners, disabled people, and women taking maternity leave. Freelance supports reduction of financial expenses of corporations and development of network cooperation in the economy.

At the same time, freelance is a form of unstable employment. Freelance as institutional pattern can contribute to development of the new social class – precariat, which has marginal position in the labour-market and high risk potential. The author has settled that freelance is in line with challenges of the modern information society and its basic requirements to an individual and organization as the participants of economic cooperation.

Keywords: Freelance; Freelancer; Information Economy; Network Economy; Precarious Employment; Precariat; Labour Market

JEL Сlassіfіcatіon: J23

Acknowledgement. The study was partially supported by the RFBR, research project No. 15-06-03161 a.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0024

References

  1. Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.
  2. Bauman, Z. (2001). The Individualized Society. Cambridge: Polity.
  3. Castells, M. (1996). The Rise of the Network Society. The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Vol. 1. Malden, MA: Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  4. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity.
  5. Vosko, L. F. (2010). Managing the Margins. Gender, Citizenship and the International Regulation of Precarious Employment. New York.
  6. Pavuk, О. А., & Moldenhauer, М. А. (2013). Employment as indicator of economy virtualization (through the example of USA). Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 11-12(1), 23-26.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v135-06/ (in Russ.)
  7. Gareis, K. (2002). eLancing – The Future of Work? In B. Stanford-Smith et al. (Eds.). Challenges and Achievements in E-business and E-work (pp. 448 -457). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  8. Muehlberger, U. (2007). Dependent Self-Employment: Workers on the Border between Employment and Self-Employment. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
  9. Malone, T., & Laubacher, J. (1998). The Dawn of The E-Lance Economy. Harvard Business Review, Sep-Oct.
    Retrieved from https://hbr.org/1998/09/the-dawn-of-the-e-lance-economy
  10. Grimov, O. A., & Kamensky, E. G. (2014). Information modernity as a context of human social life. Vestnik BGTU im. Shukhova (Herald of the BSTU named after V.G. Shoukhov), 3, 242-245 (in Russ.).
  11. Grimov, O. A., & Kravchuk, P. F. (2012). A person in conditions of information and communicative culture. Izvestiya Yugo-zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta (Southwest State University Bulletin), 6, 177-183 (in Russ.).
  12. Podgorny, B. B. (2011). Social portrait of regional private investor in stock market. Izvestiya Yugo-zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment (Southwest State University Bulletin. Series of Works: Economy. Sociology. Management), 1, 152-160 (in Russ.).
  13. Podgorny, B. B. (2015). Privatization or piratizing in Russia: population opinion 20 years later. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 3-4(2), 21-24.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v150-05/
  14. Zernetska, O. (2014). The nature of power in the global network society (Notes on the Margins of the Work of Manuel Castells). Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 1-2(1), 4-7.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v137-01/
  15. Kharchenko, V. S. (2014). Russian freelancers way of life: sociological analysis. Sotsiologicheskiya issledovaniya (Sociological researches), 4, 54-63 (in Russ.).
  16. Kharchenko, V. S. (2010). Freelance, Е-lance, outstaffing, outsourcing, coworking – mastering the new employment vocabulary. Voprosy strukturizatsii ekonomiki (Economics structuring issues), 2, 494-498 (in Russ.).
  17. Strebkov, D. O., & Shevchuk, A. V. (2015). Labour paths of self-employed professionals (freelancers). Mir Rossii (World Russia), 1, 72-100 (in Russ.).
  18. Strebkov, D. O., & Shevchuk, A. V. (2010). Freelancers at the Russian labour market. Sotsiologicheskiya issledovaniya (Sociological researches), 2, 45-55 (in Russ.).
  19. Chaplashkin, N. V. (2012). Current state of freelance in Russia and its prospects. Nauchnye problemy gumanitarnykh issledovanij (Scientific problems of humanitarian studies), 4, 211-216 (in Russ.).
  20. Fielden, S. L., Tench, R., & Fawkes J. (2003). Freelance communications workers in the UK: the impact of gender on well-being. Corporate communications: an international journal, 3(8), 187-196.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13563280310487649
  21. Fulford, H. (2001). Translation tools: an exploratory study of their adoption by UK freelance translators. Machine translation, 4(16), 219-232.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021910409796
  22. Aguilar, A. C., Garcia Munoz, T. M., & Moro-Egido, A. I. (2013). Heterogeneous self-employment and satisfaction in Latin America. Journal of Economic Psychology, 39, 44-61.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2013.07.001
  23. Zaritskaya, N. Y. (2014). Alternative lifestyle practices in Ukranian society (based on case study materials in Kiev). Labirint (Labyrinth), 2, 78-86 (in Russ.).
  24. Solyarchuk, N. Y. (2014). Freelance activity in Ukraine: state and problems of government control. Biznes inform (Business inform), 4, 284-289.
  25. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 6(78), 1360-1380.
    Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392
  26. HSE (2014). For freelancers freedom is above money.
    Retrieved from https://iq.hse.ru/news/177667758.html (in Russ.)
  27. Rusfact (2016). Average salary in Russia (1999-2016).
    Retrieved from http://rusfact.ru/node/5748 (in Russ.)
  28. Toshchenko, Zh. T. (2015). Precariat – new social class. Sotsiologicheskiya issledovaniya (Sociological researches), 6, 3-13 (in Russ.).

Received 19.02.2016