Accounting analysis and audit

Integral multi-criteria evaluation of construction sector competitiveness

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 157, Issue 3-4(1), Pages: 109-111

Citation information:
Alekseeva, V. (2016). Integral multi-criteria evaluation of construction sector competitiveness. Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4(1)), 109-111. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0034

Victoria Alekseeva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor of the Department of Accounting, Analysis and Auditing,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
vladimir_alekseev46@mail.ru

Integral multi-criteria evaluation of construction sector competitiveness

Abstract. The absence of both a unified approach to the integral evaluation of the construction sector competitiveness and adequate economic and mathematical models to measure the level of competitiveness were the cause of criteria complementing and supplementing, and development of a technique, which makes it possible to integrate all the indicators into a single system to determine region’s ranking according to the level of competitiveness and further development strategy. The approach has been tested on the six chosen Russian regions: Belgorod, Voronezh, Kursk, Smolensk, Orel, and Bryansk regions.

Keywords: Competitiveness; Integral Evaluation; Construction Sector

JEL Classification: L79; C19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0034

References

  1. Azoev, G. L. (1996). Competition: analysis, strategy and practice. Moscow: Economics and Marketing Center (in Russ.).
  2. Gelvanovsky, M. I. (1998). Competitiveness at the micro, meso- and macro-levels. REZH (REZH), 3, 67-77 (in Russ.).
  3. Fatkhutdinov, R. A. (2000). Competitiveness: economy, strategy, management. Moscow: INFRA – M (in Russ.).
  4. Vertakova, Yu. V. (2005). Indicative planning of the reproduction proportions of the sustainable development of regional economy: Monograph. Yu. V. Vertakova. Moscow: Higher School (in Russ.).
  5. Voronin, V. A. (2006). Models and mechanisms for evaluating the effectiveness of construction company integration. Promyshlennoe i grazhdanskoe stroitelstvo (Industrial and Civil Engineering), 9, 60-62 (in Russ.).
  6. Milgunova, I. V. (2008). Development and implementation of the integral strategy for building materials industry development (Аbstract of dis. cand. of sci. (Economics). Orel State. University (in Russ.).
  7. Chernyak, V. Z. (2003). Construction and public utilities economy. Moscow: UNITY-Dana (in Russ.).
  8. Ansoff, I. (1989). Strategic management. Economics.
  9. Druker, P. F. (2009). Business and innovation (Trans. from Eng.). Moscow: Viliams (in Russ.).
  10. Gouillart, F., & Kelly, J. (2000). Transforming Organizations (Trans. from Eng.). Moscow: Delo (in Russ.).
  11. Krivenko, S. V. (2014). An innovative mechanism of the formation of enterprise structures competitiveness. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 5-6, 33-36.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v141-08/ (in Ukr.)
  12. Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. New York: Harper & Row.
  13. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance. New York: The Free Press.
  14. Saaty, T. L. (1989). Decision-making. Hierarchy analysis technique (Trans. from English). Moscow: Radio and Communications (in Russ.).
  15. Cherlenyak, I. I. (2014). Competitiveness, competition, market: macrosystemic aspects. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 7-8(1), 28-31.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v142-07/ (in Ukr.)
  16. Grinko, T. V., & Gviniashvili, T. Z. (2015). Organizational changes at an enterprise in the conditions of its innovative development. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 1-2(2), 51-54.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v148-13/ (in Ukr.)
  17. Milgunova, I. V., & Vertakova, Yu. V., & Kolmykova, T. S. (2012). Formation and assessment of competitive advantages of industrial enterprises: monograph. Kursk: Southwest State University (in Russ.).
  18. Kryzhanovskaya, O. A., & Vertakova, Yu. V. (2012) Strategic guidelines for the development of regional competitive industries. Izvestiya Yugo-zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Ekonomika. Sotsiologiya. Menedzhment (Southwest State University Bulletin. Series of Works: Economy. Sociology. Management), 6-1(39), 59-68 (in Russ.).
  19. Vertakova, Y., & Klevtsov, S., & Klevtsova, M. (2015). Technology of Fixed Assets Assessment in Investigating the Stability of the Industrial Complex of the Region. Innovacionnyj menedzhment i ustojchivoe ehkonomicheskoe konkurentnoe preimushchestvo ot regionalnogo razvitiya globalnogo rosta (Innovation management and sustainable economic competitive advantage: from regional development to global growth), 11­-12, 3230­-3236.

Received 3.12.2015

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, ,

More Papers