Economics and management of enterprises

Impact of women in the board of directors on business risk of Vietnamese firms

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 160, Issue 7-8, Pages: 77-82

Citation information:
Do, H. L., Tran, T. Ph., Tran, V. B., & Nguyen, S. Ph. (2016). Impact of women in the board of directors on business risk of Vietnamese firms. Economic Annals-XXI, 160(7-8), 77-82. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V160-15

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Do Hoai Linh
PhD (Economics),
Lecturer,
Deputy Head,
Department of Banking Management,
School of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University
207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi City, 100000, Vietnam
linhdo.neu@gmail.com

Tran Trong Phong
MSc (Economics),
Lecturer,
School of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University
207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi City, 100000, Vietnam
phongtt@neu.edu.vn

Tran Van Bang
Bachelor (Economics),
President of Young Bankers Club,
Assistant Researcher at Short-term Training and Consultant Center on Banking-Finance and Security,
School of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University
207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi City, 100000, Vietnam
tranbangneu@gmail.com

Nguyen Song Phuong
Bachelor (Economics),
Assistant Researcher at Short-term Training and Consultant Center on Banking-Finance and Security,
School of Banking and Finance,
National Economics University
207 Giai Phong Road, Hai Ba Trung District, Hanoi City, 100000, Vietnam
phuongnguyen.sbf@gmail.com

Impact of women in the board of directors on business risk of Vietnamese firms

Abstract. This article aims at assessing the influence of women in the board of directors (BOD) on risk management in Vietnamese firms. The study touches upon a sample of 284 companies listed on the HOSE (Ho Chi Minh City Stock Exchange – Vietnam) in the period of 2008-2014. Their data was regressed by the random effects model (REM) and the fixed effects model (FEM). To find out which method is the most appropriate, we used the Hausman test. The study clarifies women’s role in society and the optimal ratio of women in the BOD to minimise risks at enterprises. The authors give recommendations to corporate managers regarding proper employment policies, in which the role of women is better recognised.

The most valuable result of the presented research is a grounded finding of an optimal female ratio in the BOD recommended for the Vietnamese enterprises. In order to achieve a positive impact of women on the risks reduction at the enterprise, the suggested female ratio in the BOD should be 34.96%, which will help to keep the lowest risk exposure. Hence, it could be recommended to raise a number of women in the BODs to approximately 1/3 of the total amount of members. Business owners may take this into account when planning human resource policies to maximise business performance.

Keywords: Women; Board of Directors; Impact; Firm; Risk; HOSE; Vietnam; Gender

JEL Classification: J44; M19

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V160-15

References

  1. Robinson, H. J. H., & Wright, C. D. (1889). Early Factory Labor in New England. Massachusetts: Harvard University.
  2. Bartesaghi, M., Grey, S. H., & Gibson, S. (2012). Defining (the Concept of) Risk. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Rhetorical Analysis and Invention, 8(1), 1-6.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.13008/2151-2957.1112
  3. Eckel, C. C., & Grossman, P. J. (2002). Sex differences and statistical stereotyping in attitudes toward financial risk. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 281-295.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00097-1
  4. Adams, R. B., & Funk, P. (2012). Beyond the glass ceiling: Does gender matter? Management science, 58(2), 219-235.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1452
  5. International Labour Organization (2015). Ending gender discrimination in recruitment and work environment will promote business sucess. Newsletter, 11, 1.
    Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/—asia/—ro-bangkok/—ilo-hanoi/documents/publication/wcms_355947.pdf
  6. Tran, T. T. T., Hoang, H. L., & Tran, T. H. Y. (2015). Relationship between Gender Diversity on Boards and Firm’s Performance – Case Study about ASEAN Banking Sector. International Journal of Financial Research, 6(2).
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijfr.v6n2p150 
  7. Croson, R., & Gneezy, U. (2009). Gender Differences in Preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2), 448-474.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.448
  8. Johnson, J. E. V., & Powell, P. L. (1994). Decision making, risk and gender: Are managers different? British Journal of Management, 5, 123-138.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.1994.tb00073.x
  9. Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C., & Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender Differences in Risk Taking: A Meta Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367-383.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.3.367
  10. Alchian, A. A., & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, Information Costs and Economic Organization. American Economic Review, 62(5), 777-795.
    Retrieved from https://assets.aeaweb.org/assets/production/journals/aer/top20/62.5.777-795.pdf
  11. Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
  12. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88, 288-307.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260866
  13. Holmstrom, B. (1999). Managerial incentive problems: A dynamic perspective. Review of Economic Studies, 66, 169-182.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-937X.00083
  14. Hillman, A. J., & Dalziel, T. (2003). Board of directors and firm performance: integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396.
    Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/30040728
  15. Aldrich, H. E., & Pfeffer, J. (1976). Environments of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 2, 79-105.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.02.080176.000455
  16. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, R. G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
    Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1496213
  17. Hillman, A. J., Shropshire, C., & Cannella, A. A. (2007). Organizational predictorsof women of corporate boards. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 941-952.
    Retrieved from https://asu.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/organizational-predictors-of-women-on-corporate-boards
  18. Brammer, S., Millington, A., & Pavelin, S. (2007). Gender and ethnic diversity among UK corporate boards. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 393-403.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00569.x
  19. Kolev, G. I. (2012). Underperformance by female CEOs: A more powerful test. Economics Letters, 117, 436-440.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.06.028
  20. Loukil, N., & Yousfi, O. (2013). Does Gender Diversity on Board Lead to Risk-Taking? Empirical Evidence from Tunisia.
    Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2371698
  21. Sila, V., Gonzalez, A., & Hagendorff, J. (2014). Women on Board: Does Boardroom Gender Diversity Really Affect Firm Risk?
    Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2379025
  22. Atkinson, S. M., Baird, S. B., & Frye, M. B. (2003). Do female mutual fund managers manage differently? Journal of Financial Research, 26(1), 1-18.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6803.00041
  23. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification test in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
    Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1913827
  24. Parrotta, P., & Smith, N. (2013). Why So Few Women on Boards of Directors? Empirical Evidence from Danish Companies 1997-2007. IZA Discussion Paper.
    Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp7678.pdf
  25. Randel, A. E. (2002). Identity salience: a moderator of the relationship between group gender composition and work group conflict. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 749-766.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/job.163
  26. Blau, P. M. (1977). A Macro Sociological Theory of Social Structure. The American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26-54.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/226505
  27. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathametical Theory of Communication. The Bell System technical Journal, 27, 379-423.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x
  28. Martin-Ugedo, J. F., & Minguez-Vera, A. (2014). Firm Performance and Women on the Board: Evidence from Spanish Small and Medium-Sized. Feminist Economics, 20(3), 136-162.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2014.895404
  29. Erhardt, N., Werbel, J., & Shrader (2003). Board of directors diversity and firm financial performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(2), 102-111.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8683.00011
  30. Ararat, M., Aksu, M., & Cetin, A. T. (2010). Impact of board diversity on boards monitoring intensity and firm performance: Evidence from the Istanbul Stock Exchange.
    Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1572283
  31. Farrell, K. A., & Herschb, P. L. (2005). Additions to corporate boards: the effect of gender. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11, 85-106.
    doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.12.001

Received 20.03.2016

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , , ,

More Papers

Revolutionizing digital marketing: unveiling the impact of influencer marketing, AI-driven customer support, and voice search optimization on engagement and efficiency on the example of the semiconductor manufacturing industry

Rajendran, R. P. (2023). Revolutionizing digital marketing: unveiling the impact of influencer marketing, AI-driven customer support, and voice search optimization on engagement and efficiency on the example of the semiconductor manufacturing industry. Economic Annals-XXI, 205(9-10), 50-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V205-06

Economic Annals-XXI