World economy and international economic relations

Trends in the revealed comparative advantages of the EU member states

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 161, Issue 9-10, Pages: 7-11

Citation information:
Fojtikova, L. (2016). Trends in the revealed comparative advantages of the EU member states. Economic Annals-XXI, 161(9-10), 7-11. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-02

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Lenka Fojtikova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
VSB-Technical University of Ostrava
38a Havlickovo nab. Str., Ostrava 1, 702 00, Czech Republic
lenka.fojtikova@vsb.cz

Trends in the revealed comparative advantages of the EU member states

Abstract. Today, more and more countries incorporated into international trade are causing higher competition in the world market. The paper is focused on the sectoral structure of the European Union (EU) exports in the 2000-2015 period. The purpose of the paper is to identify the main sectors in which the EU member states are the most competitive and to find out changes in the sectoral structure of the EU exports which occurred in the monitored period. The trade analysis was carried out with regard to the Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA) index. The results of the analysis showed a different structure, as well as a number of Standard International Trade Classification (SITC) divisions, in which the EU member states achieved the RCA in their exports. While the differences in the number of sectors in which the EU member countries achieved the RCA were not found among the «old» and «new» EU member states, they were obvious among big and small EU member states. During the whole period, the largest number of SITC divisions with the RCA was recorded in Denmark, Spain and Italy. The export of Cork and wood manufactures (SITC 63) recorded the RCA in 17 member states of the EU was the most competitive sector in the EU export during the whole period.

Keywords: Competitiveness; Export; European Union; Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA)

JEL Classification: F10; F15; F19

Acknowledgements. This paper was created within the frame of project registration number CZ.1.07/2.3.00/20.0296 supported by the Education for Competitiveness Operational Programme.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-02

References

  1. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade Liberalization and «Revealed» Comparative Advantage. The Manchestr School, 33, 99-123.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
  2. Bojnec, S., & Ferto, I. (2014). Export competitiveness of dairy products on global markets: The case of the European Union countries. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(10), 6151-6163.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2013-7711
  3. Cheptea, A., Emlinger, Ch., Fontagne, L., Orefice, G., Pindyuk, O., & Stehrer, R. (2013). EU External Competitiveness: recent developments. CEP II-CIREM. Final Report.
    Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2014/march/tradoc_152235.pdf
  4. Cheptea, A., Fontagne, L., & Zignago, S. (2012). European Export Performance. CEP II Working Paper No. 2012-19.
    Retrieved from http://www.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2012/wp2012-19.pdf
  5. Costinot, A., Donaldson, D., & Komunjer, I. (2012). «What goods do countries trade? A quanti- tativeexploration of Ricardo’s Ideas». Review of Economic Studies, 79, 581-608.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdr033
  6. Fojtikova, L. (2009). Foreign Trade Policy of the Czech Republic. History and present (1945-2008). Praha: C. H. Beck.
  7. Lamy, P. (2008). The economics and politics of trade are inextricably linked. WTO News: Speeches – DG Pascal Lamy.
    Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/sppl_e/sppl107_e.htm
  8. Leichter, J., Mocci, Ch., & Pozzuoli, S. (2010). Measuring External Competitiveness An Overview. Ministry of Economy and Finance, Working Papers, 2.
    Retrieved from http://www.dt.tesoro.it/export/sites/sitodt/modules/documenti_en/analisi_progammazione/
    working_papers/WP_Competitiveness__280410_EN__final.pdf
  9. Leromain, E., & Orefice, G. (2012). New Revealed Comparative Advantage Index: dataset and empirical distribution.
    Retrieved from http://www2.cepii.fr/PDF_PUB/wp/2013/wp2013-20.pdf
  10. Orszaghova, L., Savelin, L., & Schudel, W. (2013). External Competitiveness of EU Candidate Countries. European Central Bank. Occasional Paper Series, 141.
    Retrieved from https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/scpops/ecbocp141.pdf?01f7445ba92c4e4f6fa1131e1fc5865f
  11. Priede, J., & Pereira, E. T. (2015). European Union’s Competitiveness and Export Performance in Context of EU – Russia Political and Economic Sanctions. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 680-689.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.10.138
  12. Siggel, E. (2006). International Competitiveness and Comparative Advantage: A Survey and a Proposal for Measurement. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2), 137-159.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-8430-x
  13. The World Bank (2013). Online Trade Outcomes Indicators. User’s Manual.
    Retrieved from http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/docs/TradeOutcomes-UserManual.pdf
  14. UNCTADStat (2016a). International trade in goods and services.
    Retrieved from http://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/ReportFolders/reportFolders.aspx
  15. UNCTADStat (2016b). Detailed structure and explanatory notes. SITC Rev. 3.
    Retrieved from http://unstats.un.org/unsd/cr/registry/regcst.asp?Cl=14
  16. WTO (2016). World Trade Statistical Review 2016.
    Retrieved from https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2016_e/wts2016_e.pdf
  17. Yu, R., Cai, J., & Leung, P. (2009). The normalized revealed comparative advantage index. Annals of Regional Science, 43(1), 267-282.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3

Received 10.10.2016

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , ,

More Papers