Land management prospects

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 161, Issue 9-10, Pages: 43-46

Citation information:
Zos-Kior, М., Kuksa, I., Iliin, V., & Chaikina, A. (2016). Land management prospects. Economic Annals-XXI, 161(9-10), 43-46. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-10

Мykola Zos-Kior
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratiuk University
24 Pershotravnevyi Ave., Poltava, 36011, Ukraine
zos_kior@ukr.net

Ihor Kuksa
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Luhansk National Agrarian University
44 Alchevskih Str., Kharkiv, 61002, Ukraine
igor_kuksa_lg@mail.ru

Valerii Iliin
D.Sc. (Economics),
Senior Researcher Fellow,
National Centre «Institute of Agrarian Economy»
10 Heroiv Oborony Str., Kyiv, 03127, Ukraine
villin2015@gmail.com

Alina Chaikina
PhD (Economics),
Lecturer,
Poltava National Technical Yuri Kondratiuk University
24 Pershotravnevyi Ave., Poltava, 36011, Ukraine
alinachaikina@ukr.net

Land management prospects

Abstract. The purpose of the study is to give recommendations regarding the improvement of Ukraine’s resources management, particularly land resources, under the conditions of parity between economic, social and environmental components of the economy is a topical objective of today’s science. In terms of globalisation, we should focus on the advanced world experience and agricultural markets, namely the land market. The formation of methodological tools to forecast management efficiency becomes an issue of key importance.

Methods The authors applied logical and comparative analysis, and the monographic method to conduct the research.

Results. The main world trends and their impact on land management in the agricultural sector of Ukraine have been determined in the article. Mainly, they increase the anthropogenic influence on land resources. The authors have considered common factors of the national land tenure, as well as the related problems. Taking into account trends and the detected common factors, the present-day forecasts of the farm business development have been made. Consequences of their implementation in the land management of Ukraine have been analysed. The authors have suggested a diagram of the «domino effect», starting with the implementation of investment processes in agriculture and running up to the adjustment of the country’s land management to the European standards. This makes it possible to use land management dynamic systems in the agricultural sector of the economy. The authors’ developments have resulted in achieving a balance between economic interests of land management entities through their financial and organisational potentialities, which is presented as a response to the probable level of the global impacts of social, economic, political, organisational, financial and informational nature.

The present study is aimed ownership, disposal and use of management assets, which are land, land tenure or the added value gained from land use. The scheme of the formation of the appropriate level of land management by means of global forecasts and internal drivers has also been suggested.

Keywords: Resource Management; Land; Land Use; National Economy; Prospects; Harmonization; Globalization

JEL Classіfіcatіon: E60; L16; O18; Q24

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-10

References

1. Zinchuk, T. O. (2015). Problems of agro-sector adaptation to the Free Trade Agreement between Ukraine and EU. Ekonomika APK (Economics of AIC), 5, 79-87 (in Ukr.).
2. Kyrylenko, I. H., & Demianchuk, V. V. (2015). Prospects of national AIIC under forecasts for the world food market. Ekonomika APK (Economics of AIC), 1, 21-28 (in Ukr.).
3. Vernyhora, M. (2013). Ukraine investigates effectiveness of land use. Chysta polityka (Pure Politics).
   Retrieved from http://www.politika.cn.ua/list/ua/news/2/9142.html
4. Markina, I. A. (2015). Efficient use of the agricultural land resources. The Advanced Science Journal, 6, 24-29.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.15550/asj.2015.06.024
5. Pasakarnis, G., Morleyb, D., & Maliene, V. (2013). Rural development and challenges establishing sustainable land use in Eastern European countries. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 703-710.
6. Probstl-Haider, U., Mostegl, N. M., Kelemen-Finan, J. et. al. (2016). Farmers’ Preferences for Future Agricultural Land Use under the Consideration of Climate Change. Environmental Management, 58(3), 446-464.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0720-4
7. Mala, Z., & Trnkova, G. (2014). The analysis of economic results differences of agricultural holdings specialized in plant production in the Czech Republic. Journal of Central European Agriculture, 15(3), 322-334.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/15.3.1495
8. Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014). OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2014-2023. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/a-i3818e.pdf
9. United States Department of Agriculture (2016). Service Information.
   Retrieved from http://www.nass.usda.gov
10. Koeber, C. (2011). Consumptive labor: the increasing importance of consumers in the labor process. Humanity & Society, 35(3), 205-232.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/016059761103500302
11. Robertson, B., & Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (2010). Global land acquisition: neo-colonialism or development opportunity? Food Security, 2, 271-283.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-010-0068-1

Received 10.08.2016