Advancing the convergence and integration of rural border areas

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 162, Issue 11-12, Pages: 18-21

Citation information:
Hazuda, M., Gotra, V., & Hazuda, L. (2016). Advancing the convergence and integration of rural border areas. Economic Annals-XXI, 162(11-12), 18-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-04

Mykhailo Hazuda
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uzhhorod National University
3 Narodna Square, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine
mishagazuda@gmail.com

Victoriya Gotra
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uzhhorod National University
3 Narodna Square, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine
otovchitc@rambler.ru

Lesya Hazuda
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uzhhorod National University
3 Narodna Square, Uzhhorod, 88000, Ukraine
lesyagazuda@gmail.com

Advancing the convergence and integration of rural border areas

Abstract. The article touches upon the need for greater convergence and integration in order to provide economic converge and alignment of regional economies, in particular in rural border areas, which is based primarily on effective functioning of the priority areas and implementation of economic activities. The authors have conducted a rating evaluation in terms of GDP (GRP) per capita of the western border regions of Ukraine (Transcarpathian, Ivano-Frankivsk, Lviv and Chernivtsi regions) and border areas of the neighbouring countries (Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary). The study confirms that the border areas of Slovakia, Hungary and Poland differ favourably from the studied regions of other neighbouring Romania, and especially Ukraine, in terms of socio-economic development.

The authors have studied European approaches to forming agricultural policy and sustainable rural development, consideration of which will facilitate the deepening revitalisation processes convergence and integration of rural border areas of Ukraine, as well as the competitiveness of Ukrainian agricultural enterprises and their access to the European market.

EU Common Agricultural Policy towards 2020 and the Strategy of Development of the Agricultural Sector for the Period until 2020 adopted by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine were considered in the research in order to provide effective mechanism of sectoral and territorial integration of the rural border areas.

The conclusions have been formulated as follows. Ensuring convergence and integration of regional economic systems in accordance with the level the socio-economic development and compliance with environmental tenets of sustainable development is conditioned by the further integration into the European structures. In the long term, the actual task for Ukraine is to develop and adopt a new strategy of interregional and international cooperation, including integration and cooperation between the western border regions of Ukraine and the neighbouring countries, such as Hungary, Poland, Slovakia and Romania, in the field of socio-economic activities and environmental protection. Such an approach will lead to finding solutions to the problems of agricultural development as an important component of sustainable rural development.

Convergence and integration of rural border areas will help to build a sustainable living environment with further enhancement of the local population well-being and prosperity.

Keywords: Revitalisation of Development; Convergence and Integration Processes; GRP; Rural Area; Territorial Economic Systems; Neighbouring Countries; Rural Border Areas; Agricultural Policy; Ukraine; Poland; Romania; Slovakia; Hungary

JEL Classification: R11; R13; R58

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V162-04

References

1. Heiets, V. M. (2003). Transformation processes and economic growth in Ukraine. Kharkiv: Fort (in Ukr.).
2. Sakharov, A. D. (1988). Restructuring inevitable. No other way. Moscow: Progress (in Russ.).
3. Vakhovych, I. M., & Ropotan I. V. (2014). Regional convergence of the financial sustainable development of Ukraine. Lutsk: Volynpolihraf (in Ukr.).
4. Mikula, N. (2009). Problems of cross-border cooperation of Ukraine under the enlarged EU. Lviv: League Press (in Ukr.).
5. Shubravska, O. V., & Prokopenko, K. O. (2014). Integrational prospects of Ukraine: benefits and risks for the agricultural sector. Ekonomika Ukrainy (Economics of Ukraine), 1(626), 63-73 (in Ukr.).
6. Oliskevych, M. O., & Antoniak-Babish, M. R. (2015). Problems of regional irregularity employment issues in the context of European economical integration of Ukraine. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4(2), 46-50 (in Ukr.).
   Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v150-11/
7. Fedulova, L. I. (2016). Innovation of EU Economic and Ukraine: directions gap. Economic Annals-XXI, 156(1-2), 22-25 (in Ukr.).
   doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V156-0005
8. Sawers, L. (2006). Inequality and the Transition: Regional Development in Lithuania. Baltic Journal of Economics, 6(1), 37-51.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1406099X.2006.10840428
9. Caceres, L. R. (2014). Economic integration and unemployment in Central America. Journal of Developing Areas, 48(1), 43-60.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2014.0011
10. Petrakos, G., & Topaloglou, L. (2008). Economic geography and European integration: the effects on the EU’s external border regions. International Journal of Public Policy, 3(3-4), 146-162.
11. Cooke, Ph., Heidenreich, M., & Braczyk H.-J. (2004). Regional Innovation Systems: the Role of Governance in a Globalized World. London; New York: Routledge.
12. Asheim, B. T., & Isaksen, A. (1996). Location, agglomeration and innovation: Towards regional innovation systems in Norway? Report No. 13-96. Oslo: STEP Group.
    Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/stpstepre/1996r13.htm
13. Stein, J. A. (2004). Is there a European Knowledge system? Science and Public Policy, 31(6), 435-447
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3152/147154304781779813
14. Heiets, V. M., Ostashko, T. O., & Shynkaruk, L. V. (Eds.). (2014). Assessment of impact of the Association Agreement / FTA between Ukraine and the EU on Ukraine’s economy: a research report. Kyiv: NAS of Ukraine.
    Retrieved from http://ief.org.ua/docs/sr/282.pdf (in Ukr.)
15. Hazuda, L. M. (2015). Management convergence and integration processes of rural border areas: theory, methodology, practice. Uzhhorod: Sabov A. M. (in Ukr.).
16. Eurostat (2016). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
17. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2015). Statistics of Ukraine. Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://ukrstat.org/uk/druk/publicat/kat_u/publ1_u.htm (in Ukr.)
18. European Commission (2015, April 27). European Commission’s support to Ukraine.
    Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-4863_en.htm
19. Agrarian Markets Development Institute (2016). The main priorities of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the EU.
    Retrieved from http://www.amdi.org.ua/home/amdi-news/300-the-main-priorities-of-the-common-agricultural-policy-cap-of-the-eu.html
20. Popova, O. L. (2013). New priorities of the Common EU Policy for 2014-2020: strategic priorities for Ukraine’s agrosphere development. Economics of AIC, 12, 89-96. (in Ukr.).
21. Yurkenaite, N. (2012). Agricultural policy reform of the Common Agrarian Policy of the European Union after 2013. Economics of Rural and Recycled Enterprises, 3, 26-30 (in Russ.).
22. Ukrainian Agrarian Confederation (2013, June 27). EU: In the 2014-2020 with a new, fair agrarian policy.
    Retrieved from http://agroconf.org/content/es-v-2014-20-gg-s-novoy-spravedlivoy-agrarnoy-politikoy (in Russ.)
23. Chernyshev, L. I., Bilan, I. I., Horohovatska, M. Ya., & Kot, O. V. (2012). Towards a new Framework Programme of the European scientific and technical cooperation «Horizon 2020». Herald of the National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 11, 47-52.
    Retrieved from http://dspace.nbuv.gov.ua/handle/123456789/42463 (in Ukr.)

Received 14.10.2016