Privileges as a regulator of social and economic relations in European states in XIX century

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 163, Issue 1-2, Pages: 10-13

Citation information:
Yemelyanov, A., & Larina, O. (2017). Privileges as a regulator of social and economic relations in European states in XIX century. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 10-13. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-02


Alexey Yemelyanov
PhD (Law),
Associate Professor of the Department of History of State and Law,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
emelyanov46@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3193-264X

Olga Larina
D.Sc. (Law),
Professor of the Department of History of State and Law,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
lelyc@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3341-6371

Privileges as a regulator of social and economic relations in European states in XIX century

Abstract. The paper discusses theoretical, historical and legal foundations of the institute of privileges in European states. It defines its role, social value and efficiency to regulate economic relations; identifies common and specific features of economic privileges in different countries. The historical examples of privileges are Roman immunity, Byzantine exkusseia, feudal immunity and a monopoly of any kind in a sense of an exclusive right which covers a certain type of activity, granted to the individual subject.

The research covers not only the history of economic privileges and general rules of their use, but also focuses on their special type (monopolies) in order to make an in-depth analysis of specific economic processes in some European countries (Germany, Great Britain, etc.). Monopoly was one of the most common types of privilege as a form of the state regalia right implementation, it proved to be effective politically and beneficial for the go­vernment.

In the XIX – early ХХ centuries monopolistic unions’ protection in the European countries facilitated industrial output and promoted technical progress and social modernization. It is concluded that privileges are immanent to the state ability to fulfill its tasks effectively at all development stages.

Keywords: Privilege; Monopoly; Exclusive Right; Economic Relations; State

JEL Classification: K00

Acknowledgment. The article was prepared under the Government Program of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation for 2017. The paper contains some data obtained in the process of PhD research by A. Yemelyanov «Formation and evolution of the institute of privileges in the Russian legislative practice in XVI-XVIII» (Kursk, 2015).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-02

References

  1. Afanasyeva, V. I. (2007). Privilege as a source of exclusive rights in the process of formation and development of the patent right of Russia of X-XIX centuries (historical-legal research). Dissertation Thesis (in Russ.).
  2. Danilov, A. I. (1948). The main features of the immune system and conquered Church lands in Germany, X-XII centuries. Doklady i soobscheniya istoricheskogo fakulteta MGU (Reports of the Historical Faculty of Moscow State University), 7, 77 (in Russ.).
  3. Denker, E. (n. d.). Kropotkin P. A.: Views on state and law, a theoretical model of organizing society on the principles of anarcho-communism.
    Retrieved from http://www.novsu.ru/npe/files/um/1412/bg/shell/arh/stat/staty/Денкер%20Е.%20Кропоткин%20П.%20А.-%20взгляды%20на%20государство%20и%20право….htm (in Russ.)
  4. Goryanov, B. T. (1956). Late-immunity. Byzantine Annals, 11(36), 177-199.
  5. Gramenitskii, D. S. (1946). To the question on the origin and content of Franconian immunity. Srednie veka (The Middle Ages), 2, 135-153 (in Russ.).
  6. Gutnova, E. V. (1951). To the question of the immunity in Great Britain, XIII century. Moscow (in Russ.).
  7. Koshelev, V. S., Orzechowski, I. V., & Sinitsa, V. I. (1998). World history. New time of XIX and beginning of XX century. Moscow (in Russ.).
  8. Kropotkin, P. A. (1990). Modern science and anarchy. Moscow: Pravda (in Russ.).
  9. Larina, O. G. (2010). Category of financial prerogatives in historical and legal science. Izvestiya Yugo-zapadnogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. (Proceedings of the Southwest State University), 2, 128-132 (in Russ.).
  10. Larina, O., & Kukanov, V. (2016). Characteristic features of the federal state economic function content (considering economic function of the Federal Republic of Germany. Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4), 25-27.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0007
  11. Leontiev, L. A. (1961). The capitalist mode of production. Moscow (in Russ.).
  12. Lerua Bolje, P. (1900). Modern state and its limits. Paris (in French).
  13. Levy, G. (1914). Monopoly and competition. London.
  14. Levy, G. (1924). English national economy. Petrograd (in Russ.).
  15. Morozova, I. S. (1999). Benefits in the Russian legislation (theory and practice). Doctoral dissertation. Saratov (in Russ.).
  16. Rau, K. (1826). Basics of Finances in Handbook of Political Economy. Berlin (in German).
  17. Stein, L. (1885). Handbook of Finances. Wien (in German).
  18. Stoklitskaya-Tereshkovich, W. V. (1960). Major problems in the history of the medieval town of X-XV centuries. Moscow (in Russ.).
  19. Sumenkov, S. Y. (2002). Privileges and immunities as the General legal category. Doctoral dissertation. Saratov (in Russ.).
  20. Sumenkov, S. Y. (2002a). The privilege as a political and legal category. Moscow: Politics and law (in Russ.).
  21. Tarasov, I. T. (1883). Essay on the science of financial law. Yaroslavl (in Russ.).
  22. Kryvoguz, I. M., Kogan, M. A., Mnoukhina, R. S., & Kovalev, I. V. (1959). Essays on History of Germany. Moscow: Uchpedgiz (in Russ.).
  23. Trubetskoy, E. N. (1917). Lectures on the encyclopaedia of law. Moscow (in Russ.).
  24. Vasiliev, A. A. (1923). The History of Byzantium. Latin dominion in the East. The era of Nicaea and Latin Empire (1204-1261). Petrograd (in Russ.).
  25. Vladimirsky-Budanov, M. F. (2005). An overview of the history of Russian law. Moscow: Publishing House «Territory of the Future» (in Russ.).
  26. Wagner, Ad. (1871). Finances. Berlin (in German).
  27. Davis, W. C. (2005). The Pirates Laffite: the treacherous world of the corsairs of the Gulf. Orlando, Fla.: Harcourt.

Received 1.11.2016