Economics and management of national economy

Justification of approach to classification of innovations in public-private partnership

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 163, Issue 1-2, Pages: 64-70

Citation information:
Dmitrieva, E., & Guseva, M. (2017). Justification of approach to classification of innovations in public-private partnership. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 64-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-14

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Elena Dmitrieva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Samara State University of Economics
141 Sovetskoi Armii Str., Samara, 443090, Russia
dmitr-el@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5184-1705

Maria Guseva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Samara State University of Economics
141 Sovetskoi Armii Str., Samara, 443090, Russia
gusevams@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1910-8869

Justification of approach to classification of innovations in public-private partnership

Abstract. The relevance of the issue under consideration is driven by the use of public-private partnership (PPP) as the most efficient mechanism of contemporary social and economic system development. The aim of the article is to justify the authors’ approach to classification of innovations introduced in the course of or as a result of PPP projects’ implementation. The core of the approach is to systemise the results of theoretical and applied research conducted in the sphere of public and private sector interaction and PPP project management with an account of innovative factors. Case and system methods are applied to receive the main result of the research – classification of innovations. The data of PPP projects implementation on the territory of Samara region of the Russian Federation have been used as empirical evidence (case study). Samara region was ranked third in 2015 for PPP development after Moscow and St. Petersburg cities. The system method application allowed revealing the cause and effect relationship between PPPs and innovations, singling out classification bases and innovation types within the framework of PPPs. The ideas and conclusions provided by the authors may be useful in the academic sphere for further accumulation of knowledge in the PPP innovative content research sphere including practical application at development of managerial measures at PPP project implementation. The received results also aim at increasing the innovation process efficiency in new or existing PPPs. The results may be used in the public and private sectors, by PPP participants in the first place.

Keywords: Public-private Partnership; Innovations; PPP Project; Institutional PPPs; Contractual PPPs

JEL Classification: R48; D70; E61; O22

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-14

References

  1. Curatolo, C., & Bryan, V. (2012). Public-private partnerships (P3s) between businesses and adult education providers. Handbook of Research on Technologies for Improving the 21st Century Workforce: Tools for Lifelong Learning, 1, 192-209.
  2. Moore, C., & Pierre, J. (1988). Partnership or privatisation? The political economy of local economic restructuring. Policy & Politics, 16(3),169-178.
  3. Collin, S. (1998). In the twilight zone: a survey of public–private partnerships in Sweden. Public Productivity & Management Review, 21(3), 272-283.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3380859
  4. Clifton, C., & Duffield, C. F. (2006). Improved PFI/PPP service outcomes through the integration of Alliance principles. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 573-586.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.005
  5. El-Gohary, N. M., Osman, H., & El-Diraby, T. E. (2006). Stakeholder management for public private partnerships. International Journal of Project Management, 24(7), 595-604.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.07.009
  6. Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2012). Coming to Terms with Accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011-1036.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.662446
  7. De Schepper, S., Dooms, M., & Haezendonck, E. (2014). Stakeholder dynamics and responsibilities in Public-Private Partnerships: A mixed experience. International Journal of Project Management, 32(7),1210-1222.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.01.006
  8. Zaharioaie, M. (2012). Appropriate financial instruments for public-private partnership in European Union. Procedia Economics and Finance, 3, 800-805.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00233-X
  9. Clayton UTZ (2013). Improving the outcomes of Public Private Partnerships.
    Retrieved from https://www.claytonutz.com/ArticleDocuments/178/Clayton-Utz-Improving-The-Outcomes-Of-Public-Private-Partnerships-2013.pdf.aspx?Embed=Y
  10. Wibowo, A., & Alfen, H. W. (2015). Government-led critical success factors in PPP infrastructure development. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 5(1), 121-134.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-03-2014-0016
  11. Tserng, H. P., Russell, J. S., Hsu, C.-W., & Lin, C. (2012). Analyzing the role of national PPP units in promoting PPPs: Using new institutional economics and a case study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(2), 242-249.
    Retrieved from http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CO.1943-7862.0000398
  12. Roehrich, J. K., Lewis, M. A., & George, G. (2014). Are public–private partnerships a healthy option? A systematic literature review. Social Science & Medicine, 113, 110-119.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.03.037
  13. Samii, R., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Bhattacharya, S. (2002). An innovative public-private partnership: New approach to development. World Development, 30(6), 991-1008.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00015-3
  14. Esteve, M., Ysa, T., & Longo, F. (2012). The creation of innovation through public-private collaboration [La generacion de innovacion a traves de la colaboracion publico-privada]. Revista Espanola de Cardiologia, 65(9), 835-842.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.recesp.2012.04.007
  15. Akhmetshina, E. R., & Mustafin, A. N. (2015). Public-private Partnership as a Tool for Develoment of Innovative Economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 35-40.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00609-7
  16. UNECE (2016). Innovation and Public-Private Partnerships – key elements for supporting the UN 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
    Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/info/media/news/general-unece/2016/innovation-and-public-private-partnerships-key-elements-for-supporting-the-un-2030-agenda-for-sustainable-development/doc.html
  17. OECD (2005). Oslo Manual Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, 3rd Edition.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264013100-en
  18. Akintoye, A., Beck, M., & Kumaraswamy, M. (2015). Public private partnerships: A global review. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
  19. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Asian Development Bank, and Inter-American Development Bank (2014). Public-Private Partnerships Reference Guide: Version 2.0.
    Retrieved from https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-private-partnership/library/public-private-partnerships-reference-guide-version-20
  20. Kozlov, A. A. (2012). State-Private Partnership: The Essence, Classification. Management of Economic Systems, 38(2).
    Retrieved from http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/gosudarstvenno-chastnoe-partnerstvo-suschnost-klassifikatsiya (In Russ.)
  21. Robin, S., & Schubert, T. (2013). Cooperation with public research institutions and success in innovation: Evidence from France and Germany. Research Policy, 42(1), 149-166.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.06.002
  22. Kotsemir, M. N., Abroskin, A. S., & Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation Concepts and Typology – an Evolutionary Discussion. Basic Research Program. Working Papers. Series: Science, Technology and Innovation. WP BRP 05/STI/2013.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2221299
  23. Khalabuda, Y. & Nikolaev, M. (2014). Increase of Efficiency of Industrial Enterprises Activity on the Basis of Innovations of Various Types. Procedia Economics and Finance, 16, 299-302.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00805-3
  24. Tabas, J., Polak, J., & Beranova, M. (2010). Evaluation of approaches to definition of innovations. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 58(6 part 2), 563-570.
    Retrieved from https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20113063633
  25. Zizlavsky, O. (2014). An analysis of innovation classification and typology: A literature review. Proceedings of the 24th International Business Information Management Association Conference – Crafting Global Competitive Economies: 2020 Vision Strategic Planning and Smart Implementation, 1295-1308.
  26. Taran, Y., Boer, H., & Lindgren, P. (2015). A business model innovation typology. Decision Sciences, 46(2), 301-331.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12128
  27. Mostafavi, A., Abraham, D., & Sinfield, J. (2014). Innovation in infrastructure project finance: A typology for conceptualization. International Journal of Innovation Science, 6(3), 127-143.
    Retrieved from http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1260/1757-2223.6.3.127
  28. Borins, S. (2000). What border? Public management innovation in the United States and Canada. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(1), 46-74.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1<46::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-Z
  29. Moore, M. & Hartley, J. (2008). Innovations in governance. Public Management Review, 10(1), 3-20.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701763161
  30. Wu, J., Ma, L. & Yang, Y. (2013). Innovation in the Chinese public sector: Typology and distribution. Public Administration, 9(2), 347-365.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02010.x
  31. Goldiakova, T. V. (2006). Essence and classification of innovations. Russian Foreign Economic Bulletin, 2, 20-27.
    Retrieved from http://eng.rfej.ru/rvv/id?open&page=2F7D1A
  32. Sosunova, I. A., & Serper, E. A. (2010). Methodological approaches to the classification of innovations. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: ekonomika i upravlenie (Vector of Science of Togliatti State University. Series: Economics and Management), 2, 74-77 (in Russ.).
  33. Shilov, K. V. (2007). Classification of innovations. Innovatsii v obrazovanii (Innovation in Education), 3, 52-58 (in Russ.).
  34. Sandu, I. S. & Troshin, A. S. (2010). Classification of sources of investment in innovation. APK: ekonomika, upravlenie (AIC Economics and Management), 8, 38-41(in Russ.).
  35. Shlafman, A. I. (2014). Necessary and sufficient conditions to promote innovations in integration processes. Zhurnal pravovykh i ekonomicheskikh issledovaniy (Journal of Legal and Economic Studies), 2, 22-26 (in Russ.).
  36. Devkar, G. A., & Kalidindi, S. N. (2013). Modeling and assessment of competencies in urban local bodies for implementing PPP projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 3(1), 42-57.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2012-0041
  37. Zou, W., Kumaraswamy, M., Chung, J., & Wong, J. (2014). Identifying the critical success factors for relationship management in PPP projects. International Journal of Project Management, 32(2), 265-274.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2013.05.004
  38. Smyth, H., & Edkins, A. (2007). Relationship management in the management of PFI/PPP projects in the UK. International Journal of Project Management, 25(3), 232-240.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.08.003
  39. Osei-Kyei, R. & Chan, A. P. C. (2016). Implementing public–private partnership (PPP) policy for public construction projects in Ghana: critical success factors and policy implications. International Journal of Construction Management, 1-11.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/15623599.2016.1207865
  40. Pedersen, S. (2015). The sensory delivery rooms of the future: Translating knowledge across boundaries in a public-private innovation partnership. Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, 3, 387-396.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281061260_THE_SENSORY_DELIVERY_ROOMS_
    OF_THE_FUTURE_TRANSLATING_KNOWLEGE_ACROSS_BOUNDARIES_IN_A_PUBLIC-PRIVATE_INNOVATION_PARTNERSHIP
  41. Arundel, A., Casali, L., & Hollanders, H. (2015). How European public sector agencies innovate: The use of bottom-up, policy-dependent and know­ledge-scanning nnovation methods. Research Policy, 44(7), 1271-1282.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.04.007
  42. Gonzalez, E. E., & Garvin, M. J. (2016). Synthesis of Innovation Research in Public-Private Partnership Projects. Construction Research Congress 2016: Old and New Construction Technologies Converge in Historic San Juan – Proceedings of the 2016 Construction Research Congress, CRC 2016, 428-437.
  43. Roumboutsos, A., & Saussier, S. (2014). Public-private partnerships and investments in innovation: the influence of the contractual arrangement. Construction Management and Economics, 32(4), 349-361.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2014.895849
  44. Vorobeva, N. A. (2014). Public-private partnership as an effective tool for supporting the innovation process. Life Science Journal, 11(9 Special Issue), 42, 216-220.
  45. Gunnigan, L., & Eaton, D. (2008). Barriers to innovation in Public-Private Partnership COBRA 2008 – Construction and Building Research Conference of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
    Retrieved from http://arrow.dit.ie/beschreccon/87

Received 29.10.2016

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , ,

More Papers