Economics and management of enterprises

Modelling of investment decisions on technical support of agricultural enterprises

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 163, Issue 1-2, Pages: 79-84

Citation information:
Smoliy, L., Zagorodniuk, O., & Maliuga, L. (2017). Modelling of investment decisions on technical support of agricultural enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 79-84. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-17

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Ludmila Smoliy
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uman National University of Horticulture
1 Instytutska Str., Uman, 20305, Ukraine
lsmoliy@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7426-0468

Oksana Zagorodniuk
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uman National University of Horticulture
1 Instytutska Str., Uman, 20305, Ukraine
zagor@bk.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8297-2123

Liudmyla Maliuga
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Uman National University of Horticulture
1 Instytutska Str., Uman, 20305, Ukraine
lydmal1976@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4057-2404

Modelling of investment decisions on technical support of agricultural enterprises

Abstract. Introduction. Limited availability of machinery for agricultural enterprises, as well as the high intensity of its use, is accompanied by a decrease in investment activity in the agricultural sector. This necessitates a rational choice of suitable source of investment for technical upgrading and minimising of investment costs of business entities. The purpose of the article is modelling of making optimal decisions in the process of investing in technical support of agricultural enterprises under the conditions of their limited access to investment resources. Results. The authors of the article have developed a dynamic economic and mathematical model to optimise investments in the renewal of existing facilities at agricultural enterprises. The use of this model will facilitate further rationalisation of economic decision-making on the allocation of investment resources through time.

The study was conducted in respect of investments in the purchase of beet harvesters that would be used in the area of 2,000 hectares. The possibility of buying the Ukrainian machinery as well as the equipment of foreign production was considered. The problem can be solved by means of four optimisation criteria: 1) minimum cost of the investment project on the purchase of equipment; 2) minimum cost of the project including operating costs with the use of equipment; 3) minimum cost of the project in terms of investments which should be taken from external sources when using depreciation deductions for the investment; 4) minimum cost of the project in terms of investments which should be taken from external sources when using depreciation deductions for the investment and taking into account operating costs. According to the criteria of optimisation, the authors have developed the best plans of investment by the years of the investment project. It has been found that, based on the criterion of cost minimisation, buying of different types of machinery made in Ukraine is preferred despite its lower productivity. We determined that the possibility of taking into account operating costs in cash flows does not change the final optimal structure of the planned number of machinery, affecting only the total cost of the investment project – USD 326,400 and USD 620,100. In the first case, the optimal investment plan provides for the purchase of all machinery during the first year of the project; the second case covers a period of four years. The budget of capital investment reduces the implementation of the investment project due to the accumulation of external resources – USD 244,800 and USD 538,500 with or without operating costs, respectively. For these two alternatives, a minimum value of the investment program is also achieved when buying machinery only of the Ukrainian production. Moreover, the need to take borrowed funds occurs only during the first year of the project, in the amount of USD 244,800 in both cases.

Conclusions. This economic and mathematical model allows agricultural enterprises to establish investment volumes needed for the purchase of any particular type of equipment for agricultural production. Choosing the most appropriate source of investment can minimise investment costs and establish a rational investment portfolio under certain requirements and restrictions. This will allow agricultural enterprises to plan investments in the renewal of their facilities with regard to the production by the best option, given the productivity of agricultural machinery and the planned sowing areas.

Keywords: Dynamic Economic and Mathematical Model; Investment; Investment Projects; Technical Support; Agriculture

JEL Classіfіcatіon: С32; D92; Q14

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-17

References

  1. Bilousko, Ya. K., Mohylova, M. M., & Pidlisetskyi, H. M. (2013). Logistic support for the agricultural sector. Ekonomika APK (The Economy of Agro-Industrial Complex), 2, 61-67 (in Ukr.).
  2. Skocyk, V. Ye. (2013). Technical support for agricultural producers: present situation and problem solution. Ekonomika ta upravlinnya APK (Economics and management of agribusiness.), 10, 56-60 (in Ukr.).
  3. Lipsits, I. V., & Kossov, V. V. (1996). Investment project: preparation and analysis methods. Moscow: BEK (in Russ.).
  4. Birman, G., & Schmidt, S. (1994). The economic analysis of investment projects. New York: Elsevier Science.
  5. Sharpe, W. F., Alexander, G. J., & Bailey, J. V. (1995). Invetments. New Jersey: Hrentice Hall International, Inc.
  6. Masse, P. (1971). Criteria and methods for optimal determining capital investments. Moscow: Statistika (in Russ.).
  7. Northcott, D. (1990). Adoption of decisions invnstitsionnyh. NewYork: W.W. Norton.
  8. Kruschwitz, L., & Husmann, S. (2012). Financing and investment. The foundations of the modern theory of finance. Revised and expanded edition. Hardcover, Oldenbourg (in German).
  9. O’Toole, C., Newman, C., & Hennessy, Th. (2011). The role of fundamental Q and financing frictions in agricultural investment decisions: an analysis pre and post financial crisis. Economic Papers, Trinity College Dublin, Economics Department.
  10. Lefebvre, M., De Cuyper, K. Loix, E., Viaggi, D., & Gomez-y-Paloma, S. (2014). European Farmers intentions to invest in 2014-2020: survey results. No. JRC90441, JRC Working Papers, Joint Research Centre (Seville site).
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2791/82963
  11. Nabieva, L. G., & Davletshina, L. M. (2015). Return on Investments in the Formation of Fixed Capital Assets in Agriculture of The Republic of Tatarstan. Procedia Economics and Finance, 24, 457-463.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00703-0
  12. Houssou, N., Diao, X., & Kolavalli, Sh. (2014). Economics of tractor ownership under rainfed agriculture with applications in Ghana. IFPRI discussion papers 1387, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2539582
  13. Tozer, Peter R. (2009). Uncertainty andinvestmentin precision agriculture – Is it worth the money? Agricultural Systems,100(1-3), 80-87.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.02.001
  14. Kodenska, M. Yu., & Sabluk, P. T. (2012). Conceptual foundations of development and implementation of investment programs in agro-industrial production. Kyiv: NNZ IAE (in Ukr.).
  15. Demyanenko, M. Ya., Lupenko, Yu. O., Kisil, M. I. et al. (2012). In Yu. O. Lupenko, & M. I. Kisil (Ed.). Strategic directions of investment maintenance for the agricultural development in Ukraine until 2020. Kyiv: NNZ IAE (in Ukr.).
  16. Levchenko, N. V., & Ohlikh V. V. (2012). Estimation methods for investment attractivness of agrarian business in Ukrainian regions in the context of strategic planning. Aktualni problemy ekonomiky (Actual Problems of Economics), 8, 285-293(in Ukr.).
  17. Novak, I., Verniuk, N., & Novak Yu. (2016). Structuring of sources of attracting capital to agricultural production as a prerequisite for the formation of an effective investment mechanism in the agricultural sector. Economic Annals-XXI, 5-6, 29-33.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V159-06 (in Ukr.)
  18. Chumachenko, M. V. (2012). Simulation of investment processes in the agricultural sector of Ukraine. Vinnycya: Globus-Pres (in Ukr.).
  19. Karachyna, N. P., & Vityuk, A. V. (2013). Methodological limits for the evaluation of economic efficiency of investment projects. Economic Annals-XXI, 5-6, 92-95.
    Retrieved from https://ea21journal.world/index.php/ea-v129-25/ (in Ukr.)
  20. Hrytsyshyn, M., Kuzhelyuk, A. N., & Perepelytsya, N. (2015). Market of tractors in Ukraine.
    Retrieved from http://propozitsiya.com/ua/rinok-traktoriv-v-ukrayini (in Ukr.)
  21. The State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Availability of agricultural machinery and power capacities in agriculture.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)
  22. Hrytsaienko, H. I., & Hrytsaienko, I. M. (2016). Technical support of investment in agricultural production. Hlobalni ta natsionalni problemy ekonomiky (Global and National Problems of Economy), 12, 53-58.
    Retrieved from http://www.global-national.in.ua/archive/12-2016/14.pdf (in Ukr.)
  23. The State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2016). Consumer price indices.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)
  24. FAO (2010). FAO Statistical Yearbook 2010.
    Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/economic/ess/ess-publications/ess-yearbook/en/#.WNGX1tLhCos
  25. Subaeva, A. K. (2015). Foreign experience in machinery reproduction in the agricultural sector. Biznes. Obrazovanie. Pravo. Vestnyk Volhohradskoho instituta biznesa (Business. Education. Law. Herald of the Volgograd Institute of Business), 1(30),138-143 (in Russ.).
  26. Bodak, H. I. (2012). Foreign experience of the development of the agricultural production. Naukovyy visnyk Natsionalnoho lisotekhnichnoho universytetu Ukrayiny (Scientific Herald of National Forestry University of Ukraine), 22, 164-169 (in Ukr.).
  27. Hrechkosii, V. D. (2014). Modern technologies and equipment for sugar beet harvesting.
    Retrieved from http://agroua.net/news/news_47907.html (in Ukr.)
  28. Hrytsyshyna, V. V., & Pyvovar, V. S. (2009). Productivity and efficiency of new domestic machinery for sugar beet harvesting. Agricultural Productivity. Research Collection of the Ukrainian Scientific Research Institute of Productivity of the Agricultural Complex of the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine, 12, 123-127 (in Ukr.).

Received 21.10.2016

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , ,

More Papers