Analytical tools to implement integrated bank financial management technologies

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 163, Issue 1-2, Pages: 95-99

Citation information:
Chmutova, I., Vovk, V., & Bezrodna, O. (2017). Analytical tools to implement integrated bank financial management technologies. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 95-99. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-20


Iryna Chmutova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkіv National University of Economics
9-a Nauky Ave., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine
chmutova_i@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7932-7652

Viktoriia Vovk
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Simon Kuznets Kharkіv National University of Economics
9-a Nauky Ave., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine
victoriavovk@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5680-2967

Olena Bezrodna
PhD (Economics),
Senior Lecturer,
Simon Kuznets Kharkіv National University of Economics
9-a Nauky Ave., Kharkiv, 61166, Ukraine
olena_bezrodna@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-0898

Analytical tools to implement integrated bank financial management technologies

Abstract. Introduction. The rapid development of bank financial management technologies prompted by the increasing sophistication and scaling of control elements calls for harmonisation of its functions and improved analytical support. The purpose of the paper is to develop analytical tools to implement integrated bank financial management technologies, such as the balanced scorecard, benchmarking and financial controlling, which would factor in all the stages of the bank’s life cycle.

The study employed the following methods: logical synthesis – to form a system of performance indicators to measure the bank’s financial results, customer base, business processes and human resources management; canonical analysis – to establish the cause and effect relationships between the indicators.

Results. Based on the example of 27 Ukrainian banks at the intensive growth stage as a case study, the paper proves close correlation between the perspectives of the balanced scorecard: «Personnel Development»- «Business Processes»; «Business Processes» – «Customers»; «Customers» – «Finances». Conclusions. The proposed set of analytical tools allows observing the specifics of the cause and effect relationships at each stage of the bank’s life cycle between its performance indicators of financial results, customer base, business processes and personnel management. It constitutes grounds for the adjustment of the bank’s objectives maps with due regard to the cyclic nature of its development, as well as for the creation of mechanisms to apply the balanced scorecard, benchmarking and financial controlling technologies.

It is advisable to employ indicators with the closest correlation in benchmarking for setting targets when doing financial planning (using the indicators of the reference bank for this purpose), and when realising financial controlling – to find deviations of the controlled indicators from the planned figures as well as develop recommendations to eliminate the causes of such deviations. According to the results of our research, these indicators were found: for the perspective «Finances» – the total capital adequacy ratio and the share of retail loans in assets; for the perspective «Customers» – the average liabilities per one customer and the expenditure per one customer; for the perspective «Business Processes» – the operating expenditure in the total expenditure, the revenues from new products in the bank’s total revenue and the share of new products in the product line; for the perspective «Personnel Development» – the intellectual potential factor and the share of employees with higher education in the total number of personnel.

Keywords: Bank; Financial Management Technologies; Balanced Scorecard; Benchmarking; Financial Controlling

JEL Classification: С13; L20

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-20

References

  1. The National Bank of Ukraine (2017, March 09). The banking system in January 2017 worked profitably.
    Retrieved from https://bank.gov.ua/control/uk/publish/article?art_id=45156284&cat_id=55838 (in Ukr.)
  2. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action. Boston: Harvard University Press.
  3. Niven, P. (2006). Balanced Scorecard Step-by-Step: Maximizing Performance and Maintaining Results (2nd ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. Folmut, H. I. (2003). Controlling instruments from A to Z (Trans. from German). Moscow: Finansy i statistika (in Russ.).
  5. Han, D. (2005). Planning and control. Value-based controlling concept. (Trans. from German). Moscow: Finansy i statistika (in Russ.).
  6. Camp, R. C. (1989). Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices That Lead to Superior Performance. New York: Quality Press.
  7. Harrington, H. J., & Harrington, J. S. (1995). High Performance Benchmarking: 20 Steps to Success. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Rostami, M., Goudarzi, A., & Madanchi Zaj, M. (2015). Defining Balanced Scorecard Aspects in Banking Industry Using FAHP Approach. International Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 1(1),25-38.
    Retrieved from http://files.aiscience.org/journal/article/html/70220007.html
  9. Ombuna, D. S., Omido, K., Garashi, H. M., Odera, O., & Okaka, O. (2013). Impact of balanced scorecard usage on the performance of commercial banks. International Journal of Information Technology and Business Management, 10(1), 40-48.
    Retrieved from https://eprints.usq.edu.au/23285
  10. Ozturk, E., & Coskun, A. (2014). A Strategic Approach to Performance Management in Banks: The Balanced Scorecard. Accounting and Finance Research, 3(3), 151-158.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5430/afr.v3n3p151
  11. Wu, H. Y. (2012). Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning, 35(3), 303-320.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2011.11.009
  12. Balkovskaya, D., & Filneva, L. (2016). The use of the balanced scorecard in bank strategic management. International Journal of Business Excellence, 9(1), 48-67.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBEX.2016.073375
  13. Boutin-Dufresne, F., Williams, O., Pena, S., & Zawisza, T. A. (2013, February 26). Benchmarking Banking Sector Efficiency Across Regional Blocks in Sub-Saharan Africa: What Room for Policy? International Monetary Fund. Working Paper 13/51.
    Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/cat/longres.aspx?sk=40344
  14. Kaminsky, A. (2015). Credit bureau benchmarking as a tool for estimation of bank’s position at the market. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics, 166(1), 60-64.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2667.2015/166-1/8
  15. Tysyachna, Yu. S., Azizova, K. M., & Rats, O. M. (2015). Comprehensive technology of benchmarking as an instrument of providing financial security for a bank. Aktualni problemy ekonimiky (Actual Problems of Economics), 5, 427-437. (in Ukr.)
  16. Bessonova, E., & Domkhokova, T. (2016). The technique of evaluating the efficiency of controlling adjusted for confectionary enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 157(3-4(1)), 112-114.
    doi:  https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V157-0035
  17. Maliarets, L. M., & Shtereveria, A. V., (2008). Balanced Scorecard in the evaluation of the company. Kharkiv: Vyd. KhNEU (inUkr.).
  18. Tereshchenko, T. A., Romaniuk, T. P., & Bohomazova, V. M. (2012). The method of canonical correlations in multivariate economic research. Naukovyi visnyk ChDIEU (Scientific Herald of ChSIEM), 13(1), 51-58.
    Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/NvChdieu_2012_1_10

Received 20.11.2016