The methodological approach to monitoring of the economic and functional state of innovation-oriented machinery engineering enterprises at the modern technological modes

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 164, Issue 3-4, Pages: 65-70

Citation information:
Gavrysh, О., & Boiarynova, К. (2017). The methodological approach to monitoring of the economic and functional state of innovation-oriented machinery engineering enterprises at the modern technological modes. Economic Annals-XXI, 164(3-4), 65-70. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-15

Оleh Gavrysh
D.Sc. (Technical Sciences),
Professor, Dean,
Faculty of Management and Marketing,
National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»
37 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine
dekan_fmm@kpi.ua
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1961-3267

Кateryna Boiarynova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Department of Management,
National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute»
37 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine
boyarinovaea@ukr.net
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5879-2213

The methodological approach to monitoring of the economic and functional state of innovation-oriented machinery engineering enterprises at the modern technological modes

Abstract. The article is dedicated to the development of the methodological approach to monitoring of the economic and functional state of innovation-oriented machine engineering enterprises in the context of selected indices in alignment with the range of recommended (desired) values. The authors suggest the following stages of performing the monitoring: structuring of the indices which determine results of performing economic functions; formation of the composition of machine engineering enterprises in accordance with the fourth and the fifth techno-economic paradigms (technological modes); calculation of economic indices, determination of respective indices of dynamics; elimination of the influence on the values of the indices of non-systemic events; indication of the range of a recommended (desired) rate of knowledge and analysis of indices of a particular enterprise. The authors applied the proposed approach to research 20 enterprises of Ukraine which by the types of activities belong either to the fourth or the fifth technological paradigm. The ranges of recommended (desired) values for the indices of dynamics in figures relevant to the results of performing economic functions of innovation-oriented machine engineering enterprises were calculated for the fourth and the fifth technological paradigm enterprises. The difficulties in turning to the fifth technological paradigm in Ukraine in comparison with Poland, Germany, France and The United Kingdom were detected due to a complex of internal and external factors; nevertheless, a possibility for positive dynamics in 2017 has been outlined.

Keywords: Innovation-oriented Engineering Enterprise; Indices of Dynamics of Economic Figures; Economic and Functional State; Innovation-oriented Development; Technological Mode; Techno-Economic Paradigm; Industry 4.0

JEL Classіfіcatіon: M20; O12; O39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-15

References

1. Boichenko, K. S. (2014). Methodical instruments of the enterprise development evaluation. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu (Herald of Zhytomyr State Technological University. Series: Economics), 69(3), 18-25 (in Ukr.).
2. Aloshyn, S. Yu. (2014). The scientific and methodological approaches to the estimation of the state of innovative development of industrial enterprises. Visnyk ekonomiky transporu s promyslovosti. (Herald of Transport and Industry Economics), 46, 303-309 (in Ukr.).
3. Liakh, І. A. (2013). Guidelines for assessing the financial and economic activity in engineering based on the adaptive renovation approach. Ekonomika ta upravlinnia pidpryiemstvamy masynobudivnoi haluzi: problemy teorii ta praktyky (Economics and Management of Engineering Industry Enterprises: Problems of Theory and Practice), 4(24), 94-103 (in Ukr.).
4. Parfentyeva, O. G. (2015). Methodological approaches to defining diagnostic potential of the motor company. Ekonomika i upravleniie na transporte (Economy and Management of Transport), 1, 96-103 (in Russ.).
5. Kariuk, V. I. (2012). Methodical approach to estimation of innovative potential of industrial enterprises. Aktualni problem ekonomiky (Аctual Problems of Economics), 5(131), 176-182 (in Ukr.).
6. Kadarova, J., Durkacova, M., Teplicka, K., & Kadar, G. (2015). The Proposal of an Innovative Integrated BSC – DEA Model. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 1503-1508.
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00375-5
7. Carayannis, E. G., & Provance, M. (2008). Measuring firm innovativeness: towards a composite innovation index built on firm innovative posture, propensity and performance attributes. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(1).
   doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2008.016861
8. Popovichenko, Yu. A. (2012) Methodological approaches to diagnostics of economic security. Innovatsiina ekonomyka. Vseukrainskyi naukovo-vyrobnychyi zhurnal (Innovation Economy, Ukrainian Scientific Production Journal), 4(30), 154-157 (in Russ.).
9. Feshchur, R. V., & Samuliak,  V. Yu. (2010). Groups of indicators of the evaluation of enterprise development. Visnyk  Natsionalnoho Universytety «Lvivska Polytechnica» (Herald of Lviv Polytechnic National University), 691, 231-239 (in Ukr.).
10. Beliakov, G., Pradera, A., & Calvo, T. (2007). Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
11. Stock market infrastructure development agency of Ukraine (SMIDA) (2017). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from https://smida.gov.ua (in Ukr.)
12. Glazyev, S. (2011, May 31). Academician Sergei Glazyev was awarded the S. Kuznets Gold Medal «For Contribution to the Theory of Economic Development and Econometrics».
    Retrieved from http://www.glazev.ru/econom_polit/270
13. Bazhal, Yu. M. (2000, November 15-16). Economic evaluation of technological development in Ukraine: state and prospects. Ukraine on the eve of the XXI Century: Lessons and development strategy: Proceedings of the Conference, 135-139. Kyiv: UkrISTEI (in Ukr.).
14. Yerokhin, S. A. (2006). Technological mode, civilization structures dynamics and economic prospect of Ukraine. Ekonomicnij casopis-XXI (Economic Annals-XXI), 1-2, 9-11 (in Ukr.).
15. Sokolova, G. N. (2010). Economic reality in the social dimension: economic challenges and social responses. Minsk: Bel.Navuka (in Russ.).
16. Eurostat (2017). Statistics Explained. Glossary: High-tech classification of manufacturing industries. Based on NACE Rev. 2 3-digit level.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Glossary:High-tech_classification_of_manufacturing_industries
17. Eurostat (2017). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat
18. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2017). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)
19. Fedulova, L. (2011). An approach to assessing the readiness of the enterprise for innovative development. Visnyk kyivskoho natsionalnoho universytetu imeni Tarasa Shevchenka (Herald of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Economics), 124-125, 36-40 (in Ukr.).
20. Каsianova, N. V., Vetsepura, N. V., Solokha, D. V., Sotnikova, K. V., & Eletenko, O. V. (2010). Simulation system of machine-building enterprise. Donetsk: DonUEP (in Ukr.).
21. Classification of Types of Economic Activity in Ukraine (KVED) (2017). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.kved.com.ua (in Ukr.)

Received 19.03.2017