The potential of network Internet technologies in the field of management

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 165, Issue 5-6, Pages: 110-113

Citation information:
Grimov, O. (2017). The potential of network Internet technologies in the field of management. Economic Annals-XXI, 165(5-6), 110-113. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-22


Oleg Grimov
PhD (Sociology),
Senior Lecturer,
Southwest State University
94, 50 let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russia
grimoleg@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6883-9898

The potential of network Internet technologies in the field of management

Abstract. The article reveals the main features of network Internet technologies as a significant management tool for information and network economy. The author depicts the most promising areas of network Internet technologies application, provides examples of successful implementation of projects based on network technologies, and underlines the most significant social effects of management practices in the area. Building of knowledge in expert networks, and transformation of the very actor of management are among these effects. Based on the author’s empirical research conducted in 2016 among 100 leaders and administrators of big Russian Internet-communities, the main managerial advantages and possibilities of applying network technologies have been revealed. The forecast of their further development has been provided.

Keywords: Management; Network Internet Technologies; Social Networks; Crowdsourcing; Knowledge

JEL Сlassіfіcatіon: O32

Acknowledgements: The reported study was partially supported by RFBR, research project No. 15-06-03161a.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V165-22

References

  1. Grimov, O. A. (2016). Social space of the informational technology development. In 3rd International Multidisciplinary Scientific Conferences on Social Sciences and Arts. Anthropology, archaeology, history and philosophy, 3(2), 841-848.  
  2. Thornley, J. (2008, April 8). What is «social media»?
    Retrieved from http://propr.ca/2008/what-is-social-media
  3. Padała, O., Podgórniak, M., Putowski, M., Zawiślak, J., Siembida, M., & Jędrzejewska, B. (2014). Significant factor in social networks contemporary lifestyle. Journal of Health Sciences, 8(4), 59-68.
    Retrieved from https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21989019
  4. Granovetter, M. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
  5. Burt, R. (2001). The Social Capital of structural holes. New Directions in Economic Sociology. New York: Russel Sage Foundation.
  6. Shore, A. (2016). Telecommunication network economics: from theory to applications, by Patrick Maillé and Bruno Tuffin. Contemporary Physics, 57(2), 278-279.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2016.1156762
  7. Aseeva, I. A. (2016). Social technologies as an influential factor of technoscience and society development. Biosfernaya sovmestimost: chelovek, region, tekhnologii (Biosphere Compatibility: People, Region, Technology), 16(4), 79-86 (in Russ.).
  8. Howe, J. (2008). Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business. New York: Crown Business.
  9. Shan, L., Fan, X., Jinlong, Zh., & Lin, W. (2016). How crowdsourcing risks affect performance: an exploratory model. Management Decision, 54(9), 2235-2255.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2015-0604
  10. Kenett, D. Y., & Havlin, S. (2015). Network science: a useful tool in economics and finance. Mind & Society, 14(2), 155-167.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs11299-015-0167-y
  11. Cheng, L., Jiao, G., & Tian, H. (2010). A method of distribution network planning with coordination of reliability and economics. Power System Technology, 34, 106-110.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290326698_
    A_method_of_distribution_network_planning_with_coordination_of_reliability_and_economics
  12. Meiseberg, B., & Ehrmann, T. (2013). Tendency to network of small and medium-sized enterprises: Combining organisational economics and resource-based perspectives. Managerial and Decision Economics, 34(3-5), 283-300.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2590
  13. Chunxiao, J., Yan, Ch., Ray Liu, K. J., & Yong, R. (2015). Network Economics in Cognitive Networks. IEEE Communications Magazine, 53(5), 75-81.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2015.7105644
  14. Germán, S. B., Almeida Amazonas, J. R., de,  & Solé-Pareta, J. (2016). Quality of network economics optimisation using service level agreement modelling. Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies, 27(5), 731-744.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ett.3021
  15. Pyka, A., Ahrweiler, P., & Gilbert, N. (2012). Knowledge generation and diffusion processes in innovation networks: an agent-based simulation model. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsialnoy antropologii (The Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology), ХV(5), 327-348. A. V. Tavrovsky (Transl. from English.)
    Retrieved from http://www.jourssa.ru/sites/all/files/volumes/2012_5/Pyka_Ahrweiler_Gilbert_2012_5.pdf (in Russ.)
  16. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Goroshko, E. I. (2009). Is Education 2.0 The Future of Russian Education?
    Retrieved from http://ifets.ieee.org/russian/depository/v12_i2/html/12.htm (in Russ.)
  18. Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  19. Vesti (2010). Twitter and Facebook Help To Avoid Panic On The Hawaii.
    Retrieved from http://www.vesti.ru/doc.html?id=344834 (in Russ.)
  20. Basov, N. V. (2012). Generating of knowledge in social interaction. Sotsiologicheskiy zhurnal (Sociological Journal), 1, 67-90 (in Russ.).
  21. Mazzara, M. (2015, May 6). Trust and safety in social networks. Postnauka.
    Retrieved from https://postnauka.ru/video/46788
  22. Kamensky, E. G. (2016). The Reflection of social subject in the anthropogenic reality of complex society. Proceedings of the South-West State University. Series Economics. Sociology. Management, 20(3), 187-194.

Received 14.05.2017