Problems of sustainable development worldwide and public policies for green economy
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 166, Issue 7-8, Pages: 4-10
Citation information:
Vertakova, Yu., & Plotnikov, V. (2017). Problems of sustainable development worldwide and public policies for green economy. Economic Annals-XXI, 166(7-8), 4-10. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V166-01
Yulia Vertakova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Head of the Regional Economics and Management Department,
Southwest State University
94, 50 Let Oktyabrya Str., Kursk, 305040, Russian Federation
vertakova7@yandex.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1685-2625
Vladimir Plotnikov
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
General Economic Theory and History Department,
Saint-Petersburg State University of Economics
21 Sadovaya Str., Saint-Petersburg, 191023, Russian Federation
plotnikov_2000@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7051-1082
Problems of sustainable development worldwide and public policies for green economy
Abstract. Introduction. Conducting economic activity in modern conditions is often connected with a negative impact on ecology. Today, economic activity has reached such a scale that it can be considered to be a geological and climate-forming factor which can significantly change living conditions of man. This trend is a serious cause for concern and leads numerous initiatives realized at both the international and the national levels and contributing to the development of green economy. Many countries are developing and implementing special measures of public policies for green economy to level undesirable effects. Therefore, a consideration of the main challenges in the area of social, economic and environmental development, as well as structurisation of public policies for green economy is a particular concern.
The purpose of this article is to systematise the main challenges in the area of social, economic and environmental development taking into account their specific features and provide recommendations relevant to the guidelines for public policies related to the reduction of the impact of economic activity on the environment.
Methods. Theoretical and empirical methods such as literature review, retrospective analysis, logical and system analysis, and graphic-analytical methods of visualisation of system analysis are used in this research.
Results. This article presents an analysis of social, economic and environmental development worldwide and particularly in Switzerland, The United Kingdom, Sweden, Singapore, Finland, The Netherlands, The United States of America, Denmark, Luxembourg, and Hong-Kong, in the modern period in relation to the measures of public regulation aimed at levelling the negative impact of the economic system on ecology and promoting the concept of sustainable development adopted at the UNO Conference on environment and development. Special attention is paid to the analysis of the present situation in Russia, as well as to its ecological and power-oriented problems. The article reveals high importance of the development of green economy for ensuring economy stability. The authors have structured the main areas of green and provided empirical data reflecting the current trends.
Conclusions. This research proves that environmental problems are global in nature and the development of green economy is in the current interest across countries. It is possible to say that efforts made in Russia to reduce negative impact of economic activity on the environment are successful. They are in line with global trends in sustainable development policies. The involvement of both activists and civil society institutions in the relevant processes is considered to be a sign of the greening of the economy. The proposed guidelines for public policies in the area of green economy may become part of sustainable development programmes worldwide.
Keywords: Green Economy; Public Policy; Sustainable Development
JEL Classification: L52; O32
Acknowledgements. This paper is an output of the science project of the government task of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation No. 26.3546.2017/PCH «Development fundamentals of analysis and prediction of structural and dynamic parameters of the regional economy based on the integration of the Russian and world experience of territorial development management and modern scientific doctrines».
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V166-01
References
- Anisimov, V. N. (2009). Waste-free processing of natural and man-made deposits by mobile technological complexes. Gornaya promyshlennost (Mining Industry), 4(86), 42-49 (in Russ.).
- Apak, S., & Atay, E. (2015). Global Competitiveness in the EU through Green Innovation Technologies and Knowledge Production. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences,181, 207-217.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.882 - Archibugi, F., & Nijkamp, P. (Eds.). (1989). Economy and ecology: towards sustainable development. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Babkin, A. V., Plotnikov, V. A., & Muraveva, S. V. (2015). Integrated industrial structures in the economy of Russia: organizational forms and typology. Proceedings of the 25th International Business Information Management Association Conference – Innovation Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, IBIMA 2015.
Retrieved from http://ibima.org/accepted-paper/integrated-industrial-structures-economy-russia-organizational-forms-typology - Bobylev, S. N. (2013). Report on human development in the Russian Federation for the year 2013. Moscow: RAILF (in Russ.).
- Brown, D., & McGranahan, G. (2016). The urban informal economy, local inclusion and achieving a global green transformation. Habitat International, 53, 97-105.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.002 - Cato, M. S. (2009). Green Economics: An Introduction to Theory, Policy and Practice. Routledge.
- Cato, M. S. (2012). Green economics: putting the planet and politics back into economics. Cambridge Journal of Economics. 36(5), 1033-1049.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes022 - Egorova, M., Pluzhnic, M., & Glik, P. (2015). Global Trends of «Green» Economy Development as a Factor for Improvement of Economical and Social Prosperity. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 166, 194-198.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.509 - OECD Indicators (2015). Environment at a Glance 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235199-en - Götz, G., & Schäffler, A. (2015). Conundrums in implementing a green economy in the Gauteng City-Region. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 13, 79-87.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.02.005 - Irawati, D., Onggo, S., & Kennet, M. (2013). Editorial: The green economy for sustainable development in Indonesia – The challenges and opportunities of a multidisciplinary approach. International Journal of Green Economics, 7(1), 1-5.
Retrieved from http://www.inderscience.com/editorials/f128211710549361.pdf - Jacobs, M. (1991). The Green Economy: Environment, Sustainable Development and the Politics of the Future. Massachusetts: Pluto Press.
- Jänicke, M. (2012). «Green growth»: From a growing eco-industry to economic sustainability. Energy Policy, 48, 13-21.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.045 - Jean-Vasile, A., Andreea, I. R., & Adrian, T. R. (2015). Green Economic Structures in Modern Business and Society. IGI Global.
- Karakul, A. K. (2016). Educating labour force for a green economy and renewable energy jobs in Turkey: A quantitative approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 63, 568-578.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.072 - Law, A., Lacy, T. D., Lipman, G., & Jiang, M. (2016). Transitioning to a green economy: the case of tourism in Bali, Indonesia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 111(B), 295-305.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.070 - Loiseau, E., Saikku, L., Antikainen, R., Droste, N., Hansjürgens, B., Pitkänen, K., Leskinen, P., Kuikman, P., & Thomsen, M. (2016). Green economy and related concepts: An overview. Journal of Cleaner Production, 139, 361-371.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.024 - Lorek, S., & Spangenberg, J. H. (2014). Sustainable consumption within a sustainable economy – beyond green growth and green economies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 33-44.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.045 - Nadymov, D. S. (2015). Elaboration of organizational and economic mechanism of mining wastes, involving the capacity of public institutions. (Doctoral dissertation). National University of Mineral Resources «Mining», Saint Petersburg.
Retrieved from http://old.spmi.ru/system/files/lib/sci/aspirant-doctorant/avtoreferaty/2015/2015-1/avtoreferat_nadymov.pdf (in Russ.) - Niblock, S. J., & Harrison, J. L. (2013). Investability of the European Union emissions trading scheme: An empirical investigation under economic uncertainty. International Journal of Green Economics, 7(3), 226-240.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJGE.2013.058149 - Nikulin, A. A. (2013). Alternative energy from waste. Report on the seminar «Energy from waste Recycling-innovative technologies» in the framework of the XXIII international economic forum. Krynica-Zdroj (in Polish).
- Porfiriev, B. N. (2013). Green economy: realities, prospects and limits to growth. Moscow: The Carnegie Moscow Center.
Retrieved from http://group-global.org/sites/default/files/publications/
GREEN%20ECONOMY%20realities%2C%20prospects%20nd%20limits%20to%20growth.pdf - Rats, G. I., & Mordinova, M. A. (2012). Development of alternative energy sources in solving the global energy problems. News of the Irkutsk State Academy of Economics, 82(2), 132-136 (in Russ.).
- United Nations (1992, June 3-14). Rio Declaration on Environment and Development.
Retrieved from https://documents-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N92/836/55/PDF/N9283655.pdf?OpenElement - Schmalensee, R. (2012). From «Green Growth» to Sound Policies: An overview. Energy Economics, 34(1), 2-6.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.08.041 - Schulz, C., & Bailey, I. (2014). The green economy and post-growth regimes: opportunities and challenges for economic geography. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 96(3), 277-291.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geob.12051 - Shkarupa, O. V., Karintseva, O. I., & Shkarupa, I. S. (2016). Innovation potential of ecological modernization for green growth of economics: a case study. International Journal of Ecology and Development, 31(1), 73-82.
Retrieved from http://www.ceser.in/ceserp/index.php/ijed/article/view/4044 - Silajdžić, I., Kurtagić, S. M., & Vučijak, B. (2015). Green entrepreneurship in transition economies: a case study of Bosnia and Herzegovina. Journal of Cleaner Production, 88, 376-384.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.004 - Smit, S., & Musango, J. K. (2015). Towards connecting green economy with informal economy in South Africa: A review and way forward.Ecological Economics, 116, 154-159.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.04.022 - Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (Eds.). (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development. Cornell University, INSEAD, WIPO.
Retrieved from https://www.globalinnovationindex.org/userfiles/file/reportpdf/GII-2015-v5.pdf - Vertakova, Y., Polozhentseva, Y., Klevtsova, M., & Leontyev, E. (2016). Government support tools for small business: Russian and foreign experience. Proceedings of the 27th International Business Information Management Association Conference – Innovation Management and Education Excellence Vision 2020: From Regional Development Sustainability to Global Economic Growth, IBIMA 2016.
Retrieved from http://ibima.org/accepted-paper/government-support-tools-for-small-business-russian-and-foreign-experience - Emelyanov, S. G. et al (2013). Patent RU 2478169 «Plasma-chemical method for processing solid household and industrial waste».
Retrieved from http://www.findpatent.ru/patent/247/2478169.html (in Russ.) - Saidi, K., & Hammami, S. (2015). The impact of CO2 emissions and economic growth on energy consumption in 58 countries. Energy Reports, 1, 62-70.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2015.01.003
Received 19.04.2017