World economy and international economic relations

The research of global innovation capital: a review and analytical comparison

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 167, Issue 9-10, Pages: 4-7

Citation information:
Mamrayeva, D., Stybaeyeva, A., & Tashenova, L. (2017). The research of global innovation capital: a review and analytical comparison. Economic Annals-XXI, 167(9-10), 4-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V167-01

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Dinara Mamrayeva
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Karaganda State University named after academician Y. A. Buketov
28 Universitetskaya Str., Karaganda, 100000, Republic of Kazakhstan
dina2307@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-7317

Aigul Stybaeyeva
MA (Economics),
Senior Lecturer,
Department of Management,
Karaganda State University named after academician Y. A. Buketov
28 Universitetskaya Str., Karaganda, 100000, Republic of Kazakhstan;
PhD Student (Economics),
Bishkek Humanitarian University named after K. Karasai
stybaevaaigul@mail.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0752-4902

Larissa Tashenova
MA (Economics), Researcher,
Scientific-Research Institute of Regional Development
Microdistrict Orbita 1, 11/1, Karaganda, 100000, Republic of Kazakhstan;
PhD Student (Economics),
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Russia
larisatash_88@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5022-0421

The research of global innovation capital: a review and analytical comparison

Abstract. In the article, the global innovation activity in terms of 11 industries based on the data of the official international rating of Clarivate Analytics was researched. The rating was compiled by patent data analysing and quoting by four main criteria: volume, success, globalisation, and influence. The analysis of leading world companies actively introducing innovative products into such industries and sectors of the economy as aerospace and defense, automotive, chemicals and cosmetics, household goods, institution and government research, manufacturing and medical, oil, gas and energy, pharmaceuticals, software, as well as telecommunication, was presented. Among them, are: Bridgestone, Canon, Fujifilm, Honda Motor (Japan), Huawei (China), LG Electronics and Samsung Electronics (South Korea); Safran, Arkem and Alstom in France; BASF, Fraunhofer and Bayer in Germany, and TE Connectivity, Novartis and Roche in Switzerland. A brief description of the activity of the world companies introducing innovations and leading continuous work in the field of innovative developments and innovation activity in the section of each branch of economy was highlighted.

Keywords: Innovations; Derwent World Patents Index; Companies – Innovators; Innovative Activity; Thomson Innovation; Clarivate Analytics

JEL Classification: O31

Acknowledgment. The research was performed as a part of the state order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan 0288/GF4 «Investigation of the process of commercialization of innovations in the Republic of Kazakhstan in order to identify problems and develop a mechanism for effective management of the innovation process».

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V167-01

References

  1. Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2016). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 730-752.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9
  2. Bröchner, J., & Lagerqvist, O. (2016). From ideas to construction innovations: firms and universities collaborating. Construction Economics and Building, 16(1), 76-89.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i1.4668
  3. Tidd, J. (2007). Challenges of innovation, globalization and development. In Chen J. et all (Eds.), Ismot’07: Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Management of Technology. Managing Total Innovation and Open Innovation in the 21st Century, Volumes 1-2 (pp. 3-13). Zhejiang: Zhejiang University of Technology.
  4. Frishammar, J., Lichtenthaler, U., & Rundquist, J. (2012). Identifying Technology Commercialization Opportunities: The Importance of Integrating Product Development Knowledge. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(4), 573-589.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00926.x
  5. Rodríguez, J., Gómez, M. (2011). Innovation Trends in NAFTA Countries: An Econometric Analysis of Patent Applications. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(3), 116-125.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242011000300009
  6. Fedulova, L. (2010). The technological imperative of cooperation of Ukraine and Russia. MIR (Modernization. Innovation. Research), 3(3), 92-103.
    Retrieved from http://www.mir-nayka.com/jour/article/view/654/657 (in Russ.)
  7. Plotnikov, V. S. (2010). Management of national innovation system in Russia: human resources aspects. Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo ekonomicheskogo universiteta (Proceedings of the St.-Petersburg State University of Economics), 63(3), 42-53 (in Russ.).
  8. Kurmanov, N. A., & Aibosynova, D. A. (2016). Innovative activity of small and medium enterprises in Kazakhstan and their success factors. Vestnik Universiteta Turan, (Herald of «Turan» University), 72(4), 188-192 (in Russ.).
  9. Huang, C. P. (2008). Towards Open Innovation: Reaching Out for Innovation-The Case Study of Boeing and Rohm. In 3rd European Conference on Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 111-120.
  10. Kotha, S. (2010). Spillovers, spill-ins, and strategic entrepreneurship: America’s first commercial jet airplane and Boeing’s ascendancy in commercial aviation. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 284-306.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.97
  11. Thoennes, M., Busse, A., & Eckstein, L. (2014). Forecast of Performance Parameters of Automotive Fuel Cell Systems – Delphi Study Results. Fuel Cells, 14(6), 781-791.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/fuce.201400035
  12. Koelsch, P. M. (2014). Building global capabilities and delivering continual innovation across 3M. American Chemical Society Symposium Series, 1195, 141-144.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2015-1195.ch014
  13. Trowbridge, P. L., & Hokinson, S. (2002). EHS supply chain management at Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Conference Record 2002 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, 209-213.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/isee.2002.1003267
  14. Petit, N. (2015). State Created Barriers to Exit: The Example of the Acquisition of Alstom by General Electric. Competition Policy International, 11(1), 96-111.
    Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/309413822_
    State_created_barriers_to_exit_The_example_of_the_acquisition_of_alstom_by_general_electric
  15. Schöpfel, J., Ferrant, C., André, F., & Fabre, R. (2016). Ready for the future? A survey on open access with scientists from the French National Research Center (CNRS). Interlending & Document Supply, 44(4), 141-149. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/ilds-06-2016-0023
  16. Siekman, P. (2001, Oktober 1). Becton Dickinson takes a plunge with safer needles. Fortune, 144(6), 157-168.
    Retrieved from http://archive.fortune.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/2001/10/01/310912/index.htm
  17. Kappis, W., Florjancic, S., & Ruedel, U. (2015). Alstom gas turbine technology overview: Status 2014. Asme Turbo Expo 2015: Turbine Technical Conference and Exposition, 3.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2015-43289
  18. Gascón, F., Lozano, J., Ponte, B., & de la Fuente, D. (2017). Measuring the efficiency of large pharmaceutical companies: an industry analysis. European Journal of Health Economics, 18(5), 587-608.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-016-0812-3
  19. Hackl, F., Kummer, M. E., Winter-Ebmer, R., & Zulehner, C. (2014). Market structure and market performance in E-commerce. European Economic Review, 68, 199-218.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.03.007
  20. Wang, G., & Unger, J. (2013). A Strategy to Move Taiwan’s IT Industry From Commodity Hardware Manufacturing to Competitive Cloud Solutions. Ieee Access, 1, 159-166.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2013.2260793
  21. den Hartigh, E., Ortt, J. R., van de Kaa, G., & Stolwijk, C. C. M. (2016). Platform control during battles for market dominance: The case of Apple versus IBM in the early personal computer industry. Technovation, 48-49, 4-12.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2015.12.001
  22. Kim, J. M., Im, D. M., & Jun, S. (2017). Factor analysis and structural equation model for patent analysis: a case study of Apple’s technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 29(7), 717-734.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2016.1227067
  23. Kim, J., Park, Y., Kim, C., & Lee, H. (2014). Mobile application service networks: Apple’s App Store. Service Business, 8(1), 1-27.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-013-0184-z

Received 10.10.2017

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , ,

More Papers