Economics and management of national economy

Problems of developing the foundations of sustainable competitiveness of industrial and innovative economy in Kazakhstan

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 168, Issue 11-12, Pages: 38-43

Citation information:
Mukhtarova, K., Ziyadin, S., Kupeshova, S., & Doszhan, R. (2017). Problems of developing the foundations of sustainable competitiveness of industrial and innovative economy in Kazakhstan. Economic Annals-XXI, 168(11-12), 38-43. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-08

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Karlygash Mukhtarova
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan
kmukhtarova@inbox.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7881-9070

Sayabek Ziyadin
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan
sayabekz@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7219-1545

Saule Kupeshova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan
s.kupeshova@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-9804

Raigul Doszhan
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Al-Farabi Kazakh National University
71 Al-Farabi Ave., Almaty, Kazakhstan
rdd2011@mail.ru
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7480-3568

Problems of developing the foundations of sustainable competitiveness of industrial and innovative economy in Kazakhstan

Abstract. The article deals with issues and challenges related to the transition of Kazakhstan’s economy to industrial-innovative development, including the main causes for low innovation activities of enterprises, and peculiarities of the development of an effective mechanism to finance innovation activities and to strengthen the country’s intellectual capital Currently, countries that implement long-term innovative development strategies satisfying the needs of a diverse market have competitive advantages in the market.

The present research enables us to identify and analyse problems of formation and development of Kazakhstan’s industrial and innovative economy, namely the lack of application of research results in business, inadequate and ineffective funding (both public and private) of innovation activities, as well as little support and encouragement for scientists as major participants in innovation activities.

It has been concluded that nowhere in the world has a national innovation system been formed by the market or private sector alone. Kazakhstan is not an exception. Therefore, the state must play the leading role in both promoting the results of R&D and innovation activities in the market and creating the national innovation system.

Keywords: Innovations; Innovation Activity; R&D; Innovation Potential; Intellectual Potential; Industrial and Innovative Economy; State Regulation of Innovation Activity; Innovation Infrastructure

JEL Classification: O20; O38

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-08

References

  1. Guerzoni, M., & Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, 44, 726-747.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009
  2. Meelen, T., & Farla, J., (2013). Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 25, 957-970.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2013.823146
  3. Alkemade, F., Hekkert, M. P., & Negro, S. O. (2011). Transition policy and innovation policy: Friends or foes? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 125-129.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009
  4. Chaminade, C., & Plechero, M. (2015). Do regions make a difference? Regional innovation systems and global innovation networks in the ICT industry. European Planning Studies, 23(2), 215-237.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2013.861806
  5. Dnishev, F. M., & Alzhanova, F. G. (2013). Development of innovations and technologies in a globalised world: global experience and Kazakhstan. Almaty: Institute of Economy of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
  6. Mukhtarova K. S., & Kupeshova, S. T. (2015, July 08-11). Innovative Development of Kazakhstan: Problems and Perspectives. International Conference on Business and Economics (ICBE 2015), Seoul, South Korea.
  7. Satybaldin, A. A., Dnishev, F. M., & Nurlanova, N. K. (2016). Prerequisites for the transition of Kazakhstan towards inclusive development and smart specialisation. Almaty: Institute of Economy of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.
  8. Kuvandykov, A. (2013). Stepping towards new achievements. East Kazakhstan State University (in Russ.).
  9. Ibrayev, A. (n.d.). Science and innovation: to manage from one centre. National Centre for Scientific and Technical Information.
    Retrieved from http://www.kazpravda.kz/fresh/view/nauka-i-innovatsii-upravlyat-iz-odnogo-tsentra/?print=yes (in Russ.)
  10. Toffler, A. (1980). The third wave. Bantam Books.
  11. Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (2006). Revolutionary Wealth (1st ed.). Knopf.
  12. Toffler, A. (1989). The Third Wave: The Classic Study of Tomorrow (reissue ed.). Bantam.
  13. Fukuyama, F. (2000). The Great Disruption: Human Nature and the Reconstitution of Social Order (1st ed.). Free Press.
  14. Fukuyama, F. (1996). Trust: The Social Virtues & the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
  15. Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution. London: Profile Books.
  16. Bell, D. (1973). The coming of post-industrial society: A venture of social forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
  17. Kablov, Ye. (2010). The sixth technological stage. Science and Life, 4 (in Russ.).
  18. Glazyev, S. Yu., & Kharitonov, V. V. (2009). Nanotechnology as a key factor of a new technological structure of the economy. Moscow: Trovant (in Russ.).
  19. Malinetskii, G. G. (2010). Modernisation and the sixth technological stage. Keldysh IAM Preprints, 41, 16-19 (in Russ.).
  20. Sadovnichiy, V. A., Akayev, A. A., Korotayev, A. V., & Malkov, S. Yu. (2012). Modelling and Forecasting World Dynamics. Moscow: Institute of Socio-Political Research of the Russian Academy of Sciences (in Russ.).
  21. Averbukh, V. M. (2010). The sixth technological stage and the prospects of Russia (brief review). Herald of Stavropol State University, 71, 159-166 (in Russ.).
  22. Drechsler, Wo. (2011). Techno-Economic Paradigms: Essays in Honour of Carlota Perez. London: Anthem Press.
  23. Perez, C. (2003). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Pub.
  24. Vasylenko, V. (2013). Technological stages in the context of economic systems oriented on perfection. Socio-Economic Problems and the State, 8(1), 65-72 (in Russ.).
  25. Dutta, S., Lanvin, B., & Wunsch-Vincent, S. (2017). The Global Innovation Index 2017 Innovation Feeding the World. Cornell University, INSEAD, and the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).
    Retrieved from http://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_gii_2017.pdf
  26. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017). Statistical Resources.
    Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org
  27. Statistics Committee of the Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan (2017). 2015 Statistical Data.
    Retrieved from http://www.stat.gov.kz
  28. National Science Foundation (2016). Science & Engineering Indicators 2016.
    Retrieved from https://nsf.gov/statistics/2016/nsb20161/uploads/1/nsb20161.pdf
  29. UNESCO (2015). UNESCO Science Report: towards 2030. UNESCO Publishing.
    Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0023/002354/235407e.pdf
  30. Klaus Schwab (Ed.) (2015). The Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum.
    Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/gcr/2015-2016/Global_Competitiveness_Report_2015-2016.pdf
  31. UIS (n.d.). The ratio of public versus private capital in terms of investments in R&D.
    Retrieved from http://www.uis.unesco.org
  32. Zhurinov, M. Zh. (2014). National Science Report. Astana, Almaty.
  33. Battelle (2014). Global R&D Funding Forecast. Battelle R&D Magazine.
    Retrieved from http://www.battelle.org/docs
  34. PwC’s Strategy& (2016). The 2017 Global Innovation 1000 study. Investigating trends at the world’s 1000 largest corporate R&D spenders.
    Retrieved from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/innovation1000
  35. Casey, M., & Hackett, R. (2014, November 17). The 10 biggest R&D spenders worldwide.
    Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/11/17/top-10-research-development/?curator=MediaREDEF
  36. The Boston Consulting Group (BCG) (2017). Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.bcgperspectives.com
  37. Etzkowitz, H. (2011). The Triple Helix: University-Industry-Government. Innovation in Action. Tomsk (in Russ.).
  38. Guerzoni, M., & Raiteri, E. (2015). Demand-side vs. supply-side technology policies: Hidden treatment and new empirical evidence on the policy mix. Research Policy, 44(3), 726-747.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.10.009
  39. Asheim, B. T., & Coenen, L. (2005). Knowledge Bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. Research Policy, 34(8), 1173-1190.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.013

Received 15.09.2017

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , , , , , ,

More Papers