Comparative analysis of circular agriculture development in selected Western Balkan countries based on sustainable performance indicators

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 168, Issue 11-12, Pages: 44-47

Citation information:
Vasa, L., Angeloska, A., & Trendov, N. M. (2017). Comparative analysis of circular agriculture development in selected Western Balkan countries based on sustainable performance indicators. Economic Annals-XXI, 168(11-12), 44-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-09


Laszlo Vasa
PhD (Agricultural Economics),
Associate Professor,
Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade
13-15 Berc Str., Budapest, H-1016, Hungary
laszlo.vasa@ifat.hu
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3805-0244

Aleksandra Angeloska
PhD Student,
Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration,
Szent Istvan University
1 Pater Karoly Str., Godollő, H-2100, Hungary
angeloska1@live.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6805-8095 

Nikola M. Trendov
PhD Student,
Doctoral School of Management and Business Administration,
Szent Istvan University
1 Pater Karoly Str., Godollő, H-2100, Hungary
trendov.nikola@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1568-6776

Comparative analysis of circular agriculture development in selected Western Balkan countries based on sustainable performance indicators

Abstract. Modern agriculture rapidly improves productivity, yet it also pays high price for overconsumption of natural resources and energy use which is not environmentally friendly. To shape a sustainable agricultural future, the Western Balkans countries (WBC) need to tackle key challenges such as pollution, climate change and biodiversity threats. Circular agriculture is a concept that promotes the sustainable use of existing agricultural inputs and products, thus representing a driver of the future agri-food system. The paper considers basic drivers, moving from linear to circular agriculture, and summarises the implications of various performance indicators that drive circular agriculture development in Albania, Macedonia and Serbia. Based on the performance indicators, selected WBC have favourable conditions for switching from linear to circular agriculture and approach the EU level.

Besides the indicators relevant to the northern part of Serbia, where «agrokombinats» are changing the general picture of input consumption, all other indicators illustrate favourable conditions for circularity.

Technologically, Macedonia is leading in its use of ICTs for circular agriculture. The adoption of sustainable technologies for precision agriculture in the region will optimise the input use and increase productivity. The promotion of smart farming, based on the ongoing debate on the future design of the national agriculture policy to CAP harmonisation and use of EU funds to support farmers who have already taken steps towards digitalisation for circular agriculture, is a must for the region.

Serbia has positive trends in organic agriculture, which is a wider accepted concept of the circular approach. However, there is still a need for an integrated farming system to minimise the use of direct energy from harmful resources, as well as fertilisers and pesticides for crop production.

Albania shows the best performance in terms of circular agriculture, yet there is a space for improvement regarding socio-economic aspects. Shifting from extensive labour to autonomous force is needed.

Keywords: Performance Indicators; Circular Agriculture; Sustainability; Albania; Serbia; Macedonia

JEL Classification: Q01; Q51; Q57

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V168-09

References

  1. Allen, B. (2016). A step further. Horizon 2020 Projects: Portal, 9, 196-199.
    Retrieved from http://www.horizon2020projects.com/editions/horizon-2020-projects-portal-9th-edition
  2. Arcotrass Consortium (2006). Study on the state of agriculture in five applicant countries (Country Report). Köln, Germany.
  3. Bockstaller, C., Girardin, P., & van der Werf, H. M. G. (1997). Use of agro-ecological indicators for the evaluation of farming systems. European Journal of Agronomy, 7(1-3), 261-270.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(97)00041-5
  4. European Commission (2011b). Our life Insurance, Our Natural Capital: An EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions (COM (2011) 244 Final). Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.
    Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A52011DC0244
  5. European Environmental Agency (2010). Environmental trends and perspectives in the Western Balkans: future production and consumption patterns. Report No. 1/2010. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Environmental Agency.
    Retrieved from https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/western-balkans
  6. European Innovation Partnership (2015). Opportunities for Agriculture and Forestry in the Circular Economy, Workshop Report, 28-29 October. Brussels: EIP.
    Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_ws_circular_economy_final_report_2015_en.pdf
  7. FAO (2017). FAOSTAT Statistics Database. Rome: FAO.
    Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data
  8. Fogarassy, Cs., & Bakosné, B. (2014). Externality analysis of sustainable cattle breeding systems. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 26, 5-10.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.17676/HAE.2014.26.5
  9. Fogarassy, Cs., Orosz, Sz., & Ozsvári, L. (2016). Evaluating system development options in circular economies for the milk sector – development options for production systems in the Netherlands and Hungary. Hungarian Agricultural Engineering, 30, 62-74.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.17676/HAE.2016.30.62
  10. Giampietro, M. (1997). Socioeconomic pressure, demographic pressure, environmental loading and technological changes in agriculture. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Journal, 65, 201-229.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(97)00050-9
  11. Haaranen, T. (2015). EIP-AGRI Workshop «Opportunities for Agriculture and Forestry in the Circular Economy». Workshop report, 28-29 October 2015, Naantali, Finland.
    Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/agriculture/sites/agri-eip/files/eip-agri_ws_circular_economy_final_report_2015_en.pdf
  12. Mazza, L., & ten Brink, P. (2012). Green economy in the European Union. Nairobi: UNEP.
  13. Ellen MacArthur Foundation (2013). Towards the circular economy: Economic and Business Rationale for an Accelerated Transition. Cowes: Ellen MacArthur Foundation.
    Retrieved from https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/assets/downloads/TCE_Ellen-MacArthur-Foundation_9-Dec-2015.pdf
  14. Nambiar, K. K. M., Gupta, A. P., Fu, Q., & Li, S. (2001). Biophysical, chemical and socio-economic indicators for assessing agricultural sustainability in the Chinese coastal zone. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Journal, 87(2), 209-214.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00279-1
  15. Nikolić, R., Fedajev, A., Stefanović, V., & Ilić, S. (2017). The agriculture sector in Western Balkans: some characteristics of development. Economics of Agriculture, 64(1), 275-293.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1701275N
  16. Trendov, M. N., & Vasa, L. (2015). Pathway to EU integration: Rural Development Policies of the Western Balkan countries. Case study of Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia. KKI Studies T-2015/5. Budapest: Institute for Foreign Affairs and Trade.
    Retrieved from http://kki.hu/assets/upload/5_KKI-Studies_Balkan_NT-LV_20150618.pdf
  17. World Bank (2017). World Development Indicators. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group.
    Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/products/wdi
  18. World Economic Forum (2014). Towards the circular economy: Accelerating scale-up across global supply chain. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
    Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ENV_TowardsCircularEconomy_Report_2014.pdf
  19. Baller, S., Dutta, S., & Lanvin, B. (Eds.) (2016). Global Information Technology Report 2016. World Economic Forum Geneva: World Economic Forum.
    Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GITR2016/WEF_GITR_Full_Report.pdf
  20. Zhang, F. R., Wang, J., & Chen, B. M. (2003). Evaluation system and ways of land sustainable use. Beijing: China Agriculture Press.

Received 20.08.2017