Impact of national culture on innovation activities of companies: a case of Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 169, Issue 1-2, Pages: 26-30

Citation information:
Papula, J., Kohnova, L., & Papulova, Z. (2018). Impact of national culture on innovation activities of companies: a case of Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic. Economic Annals-XXI, 169(1-2), 26-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V169-05


Ján Papula
PhD (Business Management),
Associate Professor,
Lecturer,
Faculty of Management,
Comenius University in Bratislava
10 Odbojarov Str., Bratislava 25, 820 05, Slovak Republic
jan.papula@fm.uniba.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5761-9213

Lucia Kohnova
PhD (Business Management),
Lecturer,
Faculty of Management,
Comenius University in Bratislava
10 Odbojarov Str., Bratislava 25, 820 05, Slovak Republic
lucia.kohnova@fm.uniba.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4787-3901

Zuzana Papulova
PhD (Business Management),
Associate Professor,
Lecturer,
Faculty of Management,
Comenius University in Bratislava
10 Odbojarov Str., Bratislava 25, 820 05, Slovak Republic
zuzana.papulova@fm.uniba.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4415-6595

Impact of national culture on innovation activities of companies: a case of Germany, Austria, Switzerland and the Czech Republic

Abstract. Culture is a central topic of the behavioural studies of organisation. It has an impact on various business areas and business performance. Our intention is to examine the impact of culture on innovation activities of enterprises. Given the large differences in innovation activities and innovativeness in European countries according to different rankings, it is meaningful to explore possible reasons. In this regard, authors of scientific researches explore many aspects, whereas we have focused on the impact of culture. To go deeper into our research, we conducted an analysis of two cultures from one region. One group is represented by three countries: Germany, Austria and Switzerland (AT, DE, CH, respectively). The other group is represented by the Czech Republic (CZ). By undertaking a large-scale questionnaire survey in 2015-2018, we were able to obtain approximately the same sample for both groups, which allowed us to compare and draw conclusions. Both sample groups contained more than 400 respondents, with the first group having 574 and the second group consisting of 419 respondents. The aim of the research was to analyse the impact of national cultures on business behaviour, especially with regard to innovations. The contribution of this article is a comparative study of the in-depth analysis of cultural relations and innovation activities. The main results presented in this study show that cultural aspects in the examined groups have a strong impact on perceiving business partners as reliable, having trust in benefits of mutual cooperation, presenting positive role models or encouragement to innovation and creativity in education. In particular, willingness to cooperate and less anxiety or fear of know-hows being stolen, which is observed in the group of AT, DE, CH companies, may lead them to their position of strong and excellent innovators. Meanwhile, Czech companies and their behaviour are largely influenced by their historical experiences and only starting to move towards a more open innovation culture, with strategic partnerships being a new trend.

Keywords: Organization Culture; National Culture; Culture Dimensions; Innovation; Germany; Austria; Switzerland; the Czech Republic

JEL Classification: M14; O31; O32

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V169-05

References

  1. Brettel, M., Chomik, Ch., & Flatten, T. Ch. (2015). How Organizational Culture Influences Innovativeness, Proactiveness, and Risk-Taking: Fostering Entrepreneurial Orientation in SMEs. Journal of small business management, 53(4), 868-885.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12108
  2. Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Levine, R. (2004). Financial Structure and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Comparison of Banks, Markets, and Development. MA: MIT Press.
  3. European Commission (2018). Innovation Union Scoreboard 2018.
    Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/industry/innovation/facts-figures/scoreboards_en
  4. Everdingen, van Y. M., & Waarts, E. (2003) The Effect of National Culture on the Adoption of Innovations. Marketing Letters, 14(3), 217-232.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027452919403
  5. Furman, J. L., Porter, M. E., & Stern, S. (2002). The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity. Research Policy, 31(6), 899-933.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00152-4
  6. Herbig, P., & Dunphy, S. (1998). Culture and innovation. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 5(4), 13-21.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/13527609810796844
  7. Hilman, H., & Kalappen, N. (2015). Innovation strategies and performance: are they truly linked? World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 48-63.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-04-2014-0010
  8. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  9. Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1).
    doi: https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
  10. Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609-1621.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.09.007
  11. Charvát, J. (2006). Business strategies for practice. Praha: Grada Publishing (in Czech).
  12. Chua, R. Y. J., Roth, Y., & Lemoine, J.-F. (2015). The Impact of Culture on Creativity: How Cultural Tightness and Cultural Distance Affect Global Innovation Crowdsourcing Work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(2), 189-227.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839214563595
  13. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (2017). Navigating Global Business: A cultural compass. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316107034
  14. Jones, G. K., & Davis, H. J. (2000). National Culture and Innovation: Implications for Locating Global R&D Operations. MIR: Management International Review, 40(1), 11-39.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/40835865
  15. Kaasa, A., & Vadi, M. (2010). How Does Culture Contribute to Innovation? Evidence from European Countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 583-604.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438590902987222
  16. Kaasa, A. (2016). Culture as a Possible Factor of Innovation: Evidence from the European Union and Neighbouring Countries. Re-thinking Diversity, Part of the series Management-Culture-Interpretation, 83-107.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11502-9_5
  17. Leal-Rodríguez, A. L., Leal-Millán, A., & Roldán-Salgueiro, J. L. (2013). Knowledge Management and the Effectiveness of Innovation Outcomes: The Role of Cultural Barriers. The Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(1), 62-71.
    Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11441/76283
  18. Lukasova, R. (2010). Organizational culture and its change. Praha: Grada Publishing (in Czech).
  19. Matijević, S., Raguž, I. V., & Filipović, D. (2015). The role of national culture in contemporary business environment. DIEM: Dubrovnik International Economic Meeting, 2(1), 457-469.
    Retrieved from https://hrcak.srce.hr/161620
  20. Naranjo-Valencia, J. C., Jiménez-Jiménez, D., & Sanz-Valle, R. (2016). Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(1), 30-41.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rlp.2015.09.009
  21. Nazarian, A., Atkinson, P., & Foroudi, P. (2017). Influence of national culture and balanced organizational culture on the hotel industry’s performance. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 63, 22-32.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.01.003
  22. Rothwell, R., & Wissema, H. (1986). Technology, culture, and public policy. Technovation, 4(2), 91-115.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-4972(86)90002-7
  23. Rühle, E., & Wagner, V.-L. (2016). Organizational Culture: An Additional Perspective to the Balanced Scorecard. In Ellermann, H., Kreutter, P., & Messner, W. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Managing Continuous Business Transformation (pp. 495-511). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60228-2_21
  24. Tellis, G. J., Prabhu, J. C., & Chandy, R. K. (2009). Radical Innovation Across Nations: The Preeminence of Corporate Culture. Journal of Marketing, 73(1), 3-23.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.1.3
  25. Tyson, S., & Jackson, T. (1997). Organizational behavior. Praha: Grada Publishing (in Czech).
  26. Sarooghi, H., Libaers, D., & Burkemper, A. (2015). Examining the relationship between creativity and innovation: A meta-analysis of organizational, cultural, and environmental factors. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(5), 714-731.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.12.003
  27. Serrat, O. (2017). A Primer on Organizational Culture. In Serrat O. Knowledge Solutions. Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance (pp. 355-358). Springer, Singapore.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0983-9_40
  28. Shane, S. (1993). Cultural Influences on National Rates of Innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59-73.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(93)90011-S
  29. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in experimental social psychology, 25, 1-65.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6
  30. Smale, T. (2016). Why National Culture Should Be at the Heart of Innovation Management. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(4), 18-25.
    Retrieved from https://timreview.ca/article/978
  31. Williams, L. K., & McGuire, S. J. (2010). Economic creativity and innovation implementation: the entrepreneurial drivers of growth? Evidence from 63 countries. Small Business Economics, 34(4), 391-412.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9145-7

Received 4.05.2018