Money, finances and credit

Optimal portfolios vis-à-vis corporate governance ratings: some UK evidence

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 170, Issue 3-4, Pages: 57-63

Citation information:
Nor, S. M., & Zawawi, N. H. M. (2018). Optimal portfolios vis-à-vis corporate governance ratings: some UK evidence. Economic Annals-XXI, 170(3-4), 57-63. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V170-10

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Safwan Mohd Nor
PhD (Finance),
RHB Islamic Endowed Scholar in Finance,
UMT Fund Manager,
University of Malaysia Terengganu
21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia;
Research Associate,
Victoria Institute of Strategic Economic Studies,
Victoria University
Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia
safwan@umt.edu.my ,
safwan.mohdnor@live.vu.edu.au
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0791-2363

Nur Haiza Muhammad Zawawi
PhD (Accounting),
Senior Lecturer,
University of Malaysia Terengganu
21030 Kuala Nerus, Terengganu, Malaysia
nurhaiza@umt.edu.my
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9894-643X

Optimal portfolios vis-à-vis corporate governance ratings: some UK evidence

Abstract. Socially responsible investments may offer investors higher returns because of the perceived lower risk and thus associated cost (monitoring, litigation, etc.), although it might also be less profitable as posited by proponents of the Efficient Market Hypothesis where higher risk is compensated with higher returns. Corporate governance (CG) – one of the key components in socially responsible investing – has been extensively studied for evaluating its relationship with firm performance. In this paper, we extend prior literature by exploring the investment performances of two distinct portfolios built using strong versus weak corporate governance firms. We contribute by investigating the value of corporate governance (or lack thereof) in formulating portfolios. Using London Stock Exchange data for the period January 2012 through June 2018 and both ends of the quartile spectrum from 2017 Good Governance Report, we optimize each portfolio based on their Sharpe criterion.

Our findings offer some practical and theoretical implications. Investors who are conscious about CG and attempt to maximize Sharpe measure by investing in strong governance firms may face lower portfolio risk by foregoing higher returns. Whereas reduction in value-at-risk midway onwards appears to suggest investment in companies with strong CG would less likely to fail in the long run. Volatility and downside volatility results tell similar story. Indeed, from the agency theoretical perspective, companies with strong CG would lead to lower agency cost (and risk) and better firm performance.

We find profitable outcomes for both portfolios, although out-of-sample, weak governance portfolio dominates in terms of several key performance metrics.

Keywords: Portfolio Optimization; Corporate Governance; Sharpe Ratio; Information Ratio; Maximum Drawdown; Sortino Ratio; Value-at-Risk

JEL Classifications: G3; G11; C60

Acknowledgment: Dr. Safwan Mohd Nor has been awarded as RHB Islamic Endowed Scholar in Finance at University of Malaysia Terengganu, which is the first industry-sponsored endowed academic position at the university. The author would like to thank RHB Islamic Bank Berhad for the financial support in publishing this paper (Grant Number: 53276).

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V170-10

References

  1. Medland, D. (2017). Europe Accounts for Over Half of $22.89T Global SRI Assets as Sustainable Investing Takes Off.
    Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/dinamedland/2017/03/27/europe-accounts-for-over-half-of-22-89-tn-global-sri-assets-as-sustainable-investing-takes-off
  2. Gayer, M. (2018). Responsible Investing: ESG Factors Set to Alter the Investment Landscape. The Edge Malaysia.
    Retrieved from http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/responsible-investing-esg-factors-set-alter-investment-landscape
  3. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77-91.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x
  4. DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus naive diversification: how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22(5), 1915-1953.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075
  5. Kritzman, M., Page, S., & Turkington, D. (2010). In defense of optimization: the fallacy of 1/N. Financial Analysts Journal, 66(2), 1-9.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v66.n2.6
  6. Levy, H., & Duchin, R. (2010). Markowitz’s mean-variance rule and the Talmudic diversification recommendation. In J. B. Guerard (Ed.), Handbook of Portfolio Construction: Contemporary Applications of Markowitz Techniques (pp. 97-123). New York: Wiley.
  7. Nor, S. M., & Islam, S. M. N. (2016). Beating the market: Can evolutionary based portfolio optimisation outperform the Talmudic diversification strategy? International Journal of Monetary Economics and Finance, 9(1), 90-99.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMEF.2016.074584
  8. Nor, S. M., & Islam, S. M. N. (2017). Further examination of the 1/N portfolio rule: a comparison against Sharpe-optimal portfolios under varying constraints. Economic Annals-XXI, 166(7-8), 56-60.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V166-11
  9. Sharpe, W. F. (1963). A simplified model of portfolio analysis. Management Science, 9(2), 277-293.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.2.277
  10. Yoshimoto, A. (1996). The mean-variance approach to portfolio optimization subject to transaction costs. Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan, 39(1), 99-117.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.15807/jorsj.39.99
  11. Mei, X., DeMiguel, V., & Nogales, F. J. (2016). Multiperiod portfolio optimization with multiple risky assets and general transaction costs. Journal of Banking and Finance, 69, 108-120.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2016.04.002
  12. Moskowitz, M. (1972). Choosing socially responsible stocks. Business and Society Review, 1(1), 71-75.
  13. Chen, A., Kao, L., Tsao, M., & Wu, C. (2007). Building a corporate governance index from the perspectives of ownership and leadership for firms in Taiwan. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15(2), 251-261.
    doi https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2007.00572.x
  14. Gompers, P., Ishii, J., & Metrick, A. (2003). Corporate Governance and Equity Prices. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(1), 107-156.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535162
  15. Lassoued, N., & Elmir, A. (2012). Portfolio selection: does corporate governance matter? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(5), 701-713.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211275613
  16. Bebchuk, L. A., Cohen, A., & Wang, C. C. Y. (2013). Learning and the disappearing association between governance and returns. Journal of Financial Economics, 108(2), 323-348.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.10.004
  17. Aman, H., & Nguyen, P. (2008). Do stock prices reflect the corporate governance quality of Japanese firms? Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 22(4), 647-662.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjie.2008.05.001
  18. Institute of Directors (2017). The 2017 Good Governance Report: The Great Governance Debate Continued.
    Retrieved from https://www.iod.com/Portals/0/PDFs/Campaigns%20and%20Reports/Corporate%20Governance/GGI-report-2017-IoD.pdf
  19. Nor, S. M., & Wickremasinghe, G. (2014). The profitability of MACD and RSI trading rules in the Australian stock market. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 11(4), 194-199.
    Retrieved from https://businessperspectives.org/journals/investment-management-and-financial-innovations/issue-4-cont-9/the-profitability-of-macd-and-rsi-trading-rules-in-the-australian-stock-market
  20. Shahzad, S. J. H., Nor, S. M., Mensi, W., & Kumar, R. R. (2017). Examining the efficiency and interdependence of US credit and stock markets through MF-DFA and MF-DXA approaches, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 471, 351-363.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.12.037
  21. Borges, M. R. (2010). Efficient market hypothesis in European stock markets. The European Journal of Finance, 16(7), 711-726.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2010.495477
  22. Black, B., Carvalho, A. G., Khanna, V., Kim, W., & Yurtoglu, B. (2017). Corporate governance indices and construct validity. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 25(6), 397-410.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12215
  23. Black, F., & Litterman, R. (1992). Global Portfolio Optimization. Financial Analysts Journal, 48(5), 28-43.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v48.n5.28
  24. Satchell, S., & Scowcroft, A. (2000). A demystification of the Black-Litterman model: Managing quantitative and traditional portfolio construction. Journal of Asset Management, 1(2), 138-150.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jam.2240011

Received 1.07.2018

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , , , ,

More Papers