Economics and management of enterprises

Transaction costs and synergy effects in modern corporations

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 171, Issue 5-6(1), Pages: 23-28

Citation information:
Lazareva, M. (2018). Transaction costs and synergy effects in modern corporations. Economic Annals-XXI, 171(5-6), 23-28. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V171-04

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Maryna Lazareva
D.Sc. (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Professor of the Organisation Management Department,
National University of «Kyiv-Mohyla Academy»
2 Hryhorii Skovoroda Str., Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine
mglazareva@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7573-1268

Transaction costs and synergy effects in modern corporations

Abstract. Up-to-date integrated structures are managed from a single centre. When such a centre is established, a systemic effect shall arise due to centralisation of several functions at the level of this centre. This effect shall be positive, otherwise the question of reasonability of such centralisation arises. In the accounting system of an integrated structure, all costs borne by the managing company are transactional by nature. Hence, a systemic effect from centralisation stands for saving of those types of transaction costs that result from centralisation of every function: marketing, information, payroll (department), legal support etc. More attention should be paid to the estimation of transaction costs resulting from centralisation of functions at the level of coordinating centre, as this particular type of costs could be easily determined and estimated. In this paper, we propose a formula to estimate the synergy effect resulting from centralization of functions. The costs arisen at the level of the coordinating centre are systematised. A formula to calculate such costs with regard to the standard integrated structure is offered. Particular attention is given to the costs of decision-making: a new type of costs, called costs of consideration, is justified. A simplified procedure for transaction costs management is proposed.

The proposed approach to the assessment of systemic effects to save transaction costs is of high importance for practical activities, as it provides an opportunity to estimate the performance of the whole coordinating centre, evaluate the efficiency of assignment of each function and include positive effects regarding the managing department responsible for implementation of specific centralised functions into the incentive program.

Keywords: Corporation; Transaction Costs; Synergy Effect; Decision-making Transaction Costs; Consideration

JEL Classification: D23; P12; G39

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V171-04

References

  1. Center for Humanitarian Technologies (2011, October 24). 40 percent of the world’s wealth is controlled by 147 transnational corporations. Analytical Portal.
    Retrieved from http://gtmarket.ru/news/corporate/2011/10/24/3685 (in Russ.)
  2. Lutz, A. (2012, Jun 14). 6 corporation control 90% the media in America. Business Insider.
    Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6
  3. Ross, R. G. (2017). The elite control everything of significance 2016. Toronto: RIE.
  4. Taylor, K. (2017, August 24). A handful of companies control almost everything we buy – and beer is the latest victim. Business insider.
    Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/companies-control-everything-we-buy-2017-8
  5. Coase, R. H. (1993). Nature of the firm: origin. In O. E. Williamson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (pp. 34-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
  6. Williamson, O. (1985). The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. London: Collier Macmillan Publishers; New York: A Division of Macmillan, Inc.
  7. Rosen, Sh. (1993). Transaction costs and internal labor markets. In O. E. Williamson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (pp. 75-89). New York: Oxford University Press.
  8. Hart, O. D. (1993). Incomplete contracts and the theory of the firm. In O. E. Williamson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (pp. 138-158). New York: Oxford University Press.
  9. Demsetz, H. (1993). The theory of the firm revisited. In O. E. Williamson, & S. G. Winter (Eds.), The Nature of the Firm: Origins, Evolution, and Development (pp. 159-178). New York: Oxford University Press.
  10. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (2004). Economics, Organization and Management. London: Prentice-Hall International.
  11. Furubotn, E. G., & Richter, R. (2005). Institutions and economic theory the contribution of the new institutional economics (2nd edition). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
  12. Ménard, C., & Shirley, M. M. (2008). Handbook of New Institutional Economics. Boston, New York, Berlin, Dordrecht: Springer.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69305-5
  13. Zhang, Q., & Cao, M. (2018). Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation. International journal of Production economics, 195, 146-157.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.014
  14. Sottinen, T., & Vitassari, L. (2018). Conditional mean hedging under transaction costs in Gaussian models. International journal of theoretical and applied finance, 21(02).
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219024918500152
  15. Grüschow, R. M., & Brettel, M. (2018). Managing Payment Transaction Costs at Multinational Online Retailers. International journal of electronic commerce, 22(1), 125-157.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10864415.2018.1396127
  16. Fan, K., Chan, E. H. W., & Qian, Q. K. (2018). Transaction costs (TCs) in green building (GB) incentive schemes: Gross Floor Area (GFA) Concession Scheme in Hong Kong. Energy policy, 119, 563-573.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.054
  17. Gurianova, E. A., Gurianov, I. N., & Mechtcheriakova, S. A. (2014). Analysis of the Transaction Cost in Modern Conditions. Asian Social Science, 10(20), 67-72.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n20p67
  18. Marchenko, V. M., & Makaliuk, I. V. (2016). Methodological bases for estimating transaction costs in the context of mutual influence of institutional entities. Biznes inform (Business Inform), 2, 285-292.
    Retrieved from http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/cgi-bin/irbis_nbuv/cgiirbis_64.exe?C21COM=2&I21DBN=UJRN&P21DBN=UJRN&IMAGE_FILE_DOWNLOAD=1&Image_file_name=PDF/binf_2016_2_43.pdf (in Ukr.)
  19. Kiryanov, I. V. (2015). Quantitative evaluation of transaction costs organizations. The general methodological approach. Vestnik NSUEM, 1, 78-101.
    Retrieved from https://nsuem.elpub.ru/jour/article/viewFile/453/378 (in Russ.)
  20. Holcner, V., Sedlačik, M., Michálek, J., & Odehnal, J. (2014). Transaction costs in international armaments cooperation. Prague economic papers, 23(2), 217-232.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.481
  21. Nogueira, A. C. L., & Bataglia, W. (2012). Transaction costs and organizational competences: explaining the governance structure for manufacturing stage. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 7(1), 159-174.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-27242012000100011
  22. Lee, K. S., & Ng, I. C. L. (2008). Production cost, transaction cost, and outsourcing strategy: a game theoretic analysis. University of Exeter. Discussion Papers in management 8/04.
    Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10036/47081
  23. Kraciuk, J. (2014). Offshoring in the transaction costs theory. Economics and Law, 13(1), 71-82.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2014.006
  24. Baltin, V. E., & Skobeleva, E. V. (2006). Evaluation of the synergy effect of the establishment and operation of the holding. Vestnik OGU, 8, 170-175 (in Russ.).
  25. Chernov, S. V., Chernova, S. G., Stadnik, A. T., Denisov, D. A., & Ivanova, A. S. (2015). Synergetic effect in corporate governance. Vestnik NGAU, 36(3), 189-195 (in Russ.).
  26. Zhurova, L. I. (2017). Approaches to assessing the synergies of the corporate system. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva, 2(3), 26-31 (in Russ.).
  27. Kapelyushnikov, R. I. (1994). A Category of transaction costs. Proceedings of the Institute of Commercial Engineering, «How is it done: financial, social and information technology», 3, 56-62.
    Retrieved from http://www.libertarium.ru/l_libsb3_1-2 (in Russ.)
  28. Altshuller, I., & Gorodnov, A. (2011). Business as a system 2. Panorama of ideas and methods. St. Petersburg: Piter (in Russ.).
  29. Shastitko, A. E. (2008). Competition and anti-monopoly policy in neo-Austrian theory. Ekonomicheskaya politika (The Economic Policy), 2, 107-126.
    Retrieved from http://www.seinstitute.ru/Files/Z6-p81-113.pdf (in Russ.)
  30. Lazareva, M. G. (2014). Certain features of transaction costs of holding companies. Gospodarka Współczesna, 1, 165-176.

Received 20.06.2018

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , ,

More Papers

Revolutionizing digital marketing: unveiling the impact of influencer marketing, AI-driven customer support, and voice search optimization on engagement and efficiency on the example of the semiconductor manufacturing industry

Rajendran, R. P. (2023). Revolutionizing digital marketing: unveiling the impact of influencer marketing, AI-driven customer support, and voice search optimization on engagement and efficiency on the example of the semiconductor manufacturing industry. Economic Annals-XXI, 205(9-10), 50-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V205-06

Economic Annals-XXI