Economic and political factors affecting attitudes of Slovakia and Hungary towards the future of the EU

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 172, Issue 7-8, Pages: 28-31

Citation information:
Kurucz, M. (2018). Economic and political factors affecting attitudes of Slovakia and Hungary towards the future of the EU. Economic Annals-XXI, 172(7-8), 28-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V172-05


Milan Kurucz
PhD (Political Science),
Associate Professor,
University of Economics in Bratislava
1 Dolnozemska cesta Str., Bratislava, 85235, Slovak Republic
milan.kurucz@euba.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7523-0498

Economic and political factors affecting attitudes of Slovakia and Hungary towards the future of the EU

Abstract. This paper identifies the factors that, despite the similar political and economic system characteristics, considerably influence attitudes of the Slovak and Hungarian political elites towards the future development of the EU and its institutions. While Slovakia is in favour of enhanced cooperation within the union, Hungary prefers its transformation into the Europe of nations, in which decisions will be taken by states. In economic dimension, the attitudes of both countries are dissimilar due to the different effects of the global crisis on their economies as well as their financial and social environment. The contribution shows that the measures associated with the preparation for the entry into the euro area have helped Slovakia to handle the impacts of the financial and economic crisis. Subsequent accession into the Eurozone and its positive effect on the economy has become an important structural factor influencing the positive attitude of the ruling elite to closer integration in the EU. On the other hand, the global economic crisis has deepened the problems of the Hungarian economy. The conditions of the IMF and the EU loan were perceived as an intervention into the sovereign decision-making about Hungary’s own economic policy. Hence, overcoming the crisis has been, on the contrary to Slovakia, interpreted as the result of the independent government policy. This fact has been a key stimulus to the efforts of Hungary to strengthen of the member states’ position within the EU.

The attitudes of both countries to the future of the EU are influenced also by constellation of economic and political actors. In Hungary, the government for the long term strengthens the economic position of domestic businesses, concentrates the political power and implements foreign policy with a strong emphasis on national sovereignty. Slovakia is more willing to participate, with the exception of migration, in deepening of European integration due to economic conditions and significantly pluralistic political environment.

Keywords: European Union; Slovakia; Hungary; Visegrad Group; European Integration; Eurozone

JEL Classification: F15; F55

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V172-05

References

  1. European Parliament (2017). The future of the EU: Members have negotiated five scenarios with President Juncker.
    Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/hungary/hu/aktualis/2017-hirek/hirek-2017-marcius/az-eu-jovoje.html (in Hungarian)
  2. Ágh, A. (2017). Increasing Europopulism as a Megatrend in East Central Europe: From Facade Democracies to Velvet Dictatorship. Baltic Journal of Political Science, 5, 21-39.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.15388/BJPS.2016.5.10334
  3. Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist Diversity on Europe´s Periphery. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
  4. European Commission (2008). Convergence Report 2008. European economy, 3. Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs. Luxemburg: Office for official publications of the European Communities.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2765/40536
  5. European Commission (2008). Convergence Report 2018. European economy, Institutional paper No. 078.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2765/22122
  6. Csáki, G. (2013). IMF loans to Hungary, 1996-2008. Pénzügyi Szemle (Public Finance Quarterly), 58(1), 95-108.
    Retrieved from https://www.penzugyiszemle.hu/documents/csakigy-2013-1pdf_20170825110043_18.pdf (in Hungarian)
  7. Drahokoupil, J. (2009). Globalization and the State in Central and Eastern Europe. The politics of foreign investment. Abingdon, Oxon, Ox: Routledge.
  8. Eurostat (2018). General government gross debt – annual data.
    Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&language=en&pcode=teina225&plugin=1
  9. Gabrižová, Z. (2017, June 16). What is needed for Slovakia to be at the heart of the EU. Euractive. Retrieved from https://euractiv.sk/section/buducnost-eu/news/co-treba-na-aby-bolo-slovensko-v-jadre-eu (in Slovak)
  10. Holman, O. (2001). The enlargement of the European Union towards Central and Eastern Europe: The role of supranational and transnational actors. In A. Bieler, & A. D. Morton (Eds.), Social forces in the making of new Europe. The restructuring of European social relation in the global political economy (pp. 161-184). Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire, New York, N.Y.: Palgrave.
  11. Körösényi, A. (2015). Three sections of Hungarian democracy. In A. Körösényi (Ed.), The Hungarian political system – after a quarter century (pp. 401-421). Budapest: Osiris (in Hungarian).
  12. Magone, J. M., Laffan, B., & Schweiger, Ch. (Eds.) (2016). Core-periphery Relations in the European Union. Power and Conflict in a Dualist Political Economy. Abingdon & NewYork: Routledge.
  13. Group of European Conservatives and Reformists (2017). Manifesto of Slovak Euro-Realism.
    Retrieved from https://www.flipgorilla.com/­p­/24942796347542340/show#/24942796347542340/6 (in Slovak)
  14. Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2013). Transitional economies. Political Economy of Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Praha: Academia (in Czech).
  15. Nič, M. (2016). The Visegrad Goup in the EU: 2016 as a turning-point? European View, 15(2), 281-290.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-016-0422-6
  16. Prime Minister of Hungary (2018, May 10). Viktor Orbán’s speech after the Prime Minister’s oath. Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.miniszterelnok.hu/orban-viktor-beszede-a-miniszterelnoki-eskutetelet-kovetoen (in Hungarian)
  17. Prime Minister’s Cabinet Office (2018). Viktor Orbán’s presentation at the V4 conference «The future of Europe». Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://www.kormany.hu/hu/a-miniszterelnok/beszedek-publikaciok-interjuk/orban-viktor-eloadasa-az-europa-jovoje-cimu-v4-konferencian (in Hungarian)
  18. Pakulski, J. (Ed.). (2016). The Visegrad Countries in Crisis. Warsaw: Collegium Civitas.
    Retrieved from https://depot.ceon.pl/bitstream/handle/123456789/12433/The-Visegrad-Countries-in-Crisis-%20-ed.-J.-Pakulski-2016.pdf?sequence=1
  19. Pogátsa, Z. (2016). Hungary’s political economy. The chances of the Northern model. Budapest: Osiris (in Hungarian).
  20. Sadecki, A. (2014). In a state of necessity. How has Orban changed Hungary. Point of View, 04. Warsaw: Centre for Eastern studies.
    Retrieved from https://www.osw.waw.pl/sites/default/files/pw_41_in-a-state-of-necessity_net.pdf
  21. Schweiger, Ch., & Visvizi, A. (Eds.). (2018). Central and Eastern Europe in the EU. Chalenges and Perspectives under Crisis Conditions. Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
  22. European Commission (2017, November). Standard Eurobarometer 88 – Autumn 2017. Public opinion in the European Union. Directorate-General for Communication.
    Retrieved from http://www.poci-compete2020.pt/admin/images/Standard_Eurobarometer_88_UE_dez-2017.pdf
  23. Svetlosakova, Z. (2009, April 1). The Impact of the Financial Crisis on Euro-Adaptation Strategies in Central Europe. The SAIS Europe Journal of Global Affairs.
    Retrieved from http://www.saisjournal.org/posts/the-impact-of-the-financial-crisis-on-euro-adoption-strategies-in-central-europe
  24. Wiener, G. (2015, March-April). Viktor Orbán’s passive power. Ezredvég, 2.
    Retrierved from http://ezredveg.vasaros.com/html/2015_03_04/1503042.html#wigy (in Hungarian)

Received 6.09.2018