Readiness of Russian regions to digitize the economy

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 174, Issue 11-12, Pages: 16-21

Citation information:
Tikhonova, A., Melnikova, N., & Vishnevskaya, N. (2018). Readiness of Russian regions to digitize the economy. Economic Annals-XXI, 174(11-12), 16-21. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V174-03


Anna Tikhonova
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Department of Tax Policy and Customs Tariff Regulation,
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation;
Associate Professor of the Department of Statistics and Econometrics,
Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
49 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
AVTihonova@fa.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8295-8113

Nadezhda Melnikova
PhD (Economics),
Professor,
Department of Tax Policy and Customs Tariff Regulation,
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
49 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
nmelnikova@fa.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7497-9176

Nadezhda Vishnevskaya
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Department of Tax Policy and Customs Tariff Regulation,
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
49 Leningradsky Ave., Moscow, 125993, Russian Federation
ngvishnevskaya@fa.ru
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5403-8213

Readiness of Russian regions to digitize the economy

Abstract. The article examines the compliance of the technical and economic conditions of the Russian regions with the total digitalization process. As a research methodology, the authors used their own approach, based on carrying out an interval analytical grouping on a multidimensional average. 17 indicators were selected to calculate the multidimensional average. The indicators characterise technical and economic conditions for digitalization. Using the correlation analysis, the authors developed a mechanism to emit «noise» factors, i.e. factors which do not impact the general tendencies. The results of the analysis show the absence of a clear relationship between the level of socio-economic development and readiness for digitalization in the lower groups of regions. There is no clearly defined geographical dependence. Meanwhile, the City of Moscow and Moscow region are considered to be the leading regions. In the group with an average integral indicator, there appeared regions, which were the first to start switching to digital content. The main problem of digitalization is the lack of financial resources. In this connection, it is determined that the most effective way to finance digitalization is a public-private partnership.

Keywords: Digital Economy; Digitalization; Regions of the Russian Federation; Multidimensional Average; Interval Grouping; Correlation Analysis

JEL Classification: E69; C18; C100

Acknowledgements: The article developed based on the results of research carried out at the expense of budget funds according to the government task for the Financial University in 2018.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V174-03

References

  1. Gaslikova, I. R., & Gokhberg, L. M. (2001). Information technology in Russia. Moscow: Center for Research and Science Statistics (in Russ.).
  2. Garifova, L. F. (2014). The Economy of the Digital Epoch in Russia: Development Tendencies and Place in Business. Procedia Economics and Finance, 15, 1159-1164.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00572-3
  3. Garifova, L. F. (2015). Infonomics and the Value of Information in the Digital Economy. Procedia Economics and Finance, 23, 738-743.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(15)00423-2
  4. Gruber, H. (2017). Innovation, skills and investment: a digital industrial policy for Europe. Economia e Politica Industriale, 44(3), 327-343.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40812-017-0073-x
  5. Babkin, A. V. (Ed.) (2017). Digital transformation of the economy and industry: problems and prospects. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of the Polytechnic University.
    Retrieved from http://inecprom.spbstu.ru/files/industry-2017/digital-transformation-economy-industry.pdf (in Russ.)
  6. Zozulya, D. M. (2018). Digitalization of the Russian economy and industry 4.0: challenges and prospects. Issues of innovative economy, 8(1), 1-14.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.18334/vinec.8.1.38856 (in Russ.)
  7. Biichuk, A. N. (2017). Digital transformation of business in the modern economy. Economic environment, 2(20), 14-16 (in Russ.).
  8. Gerasimova, T. A. (2017). Digital economy of Russia and the potential of Irkutsk region. Socio-cultural dynamics of Irkutsk region in the XX – early XXI century: materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference with international participation (pp. 156-161) (in Russ.).
  9. Bublik, N. D., Lukina, I. I., Chuvilin, D. V., Shafikov, T. A., & Yunusova, R. F. (2018). The development of the digital economy in the regions of Russia: ­problems and opportunities (on the example of the Republic of Bashkortostan). Regional Economics and Management: electronic scientific journal, 53(1), 5313. ­
    Retrieved from https://eee-region.ru/article/5313 (in Russ.)
  10. Dvas, G. V. (2017). Formation of regional programs of digital economy development. Management of economic systems: scientific electronic journal, 106(12), 41.
    Retrieved from http://www.uecs.ru/uecs-106-1062017/item/4721-2017-12-19-10-41-38 (in Russ.)
  11. Apatova, N. V., & Korolev, O. L. (2017). Problems of formation of the innovation infrastructure of the region in a digital economy. Scientific Notes of the Crimean Federal University named after V. I. Vernadsky. Economics and Management, 69((3)1), 3-11.
    Retrieved from http://sn-ecoman.cfuv.ru/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/001apatova.pdf (in Russ.)
  12. Costa, G. O. T., Machado, A. F., & Amaral, P. V. (2018). Vulnerability to poverty in Brazilian municipalities in 2000 and 2010: A multidimensional approach. EconomiA, 19(1), 132-148.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2017.11.001
  13. Dubois, J.-L., & Rousseau, S. (2008). Reinforcing households’ capabilities as a way to reduce vulnerability and prevent poverty in equitable terms. In F. Сomim, M. Qizilbash & S. Alkire (Eds.), The Capability Approach: Concepts, Measures and Applications (pp. 421-436). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511492587.014
  14. Steshenko, J. A., & Tikhonova, A. V. (2018). An integral approach to evaluating the effectiveness of tax incentives. Journal of Tax Reform, 4(2), 157-173.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2018.4.2.050
  15. Garbarino, S., & Holland, J. (2009, March). Quantitative and Qualitative Methods in Impact Evaluation and Measuring Results. Issues Paper. Social Development Direct.
    Retrieved from http://www.gsdrc.org/docs/open/eirs4.pdf
  16. Quaranta, A. G., Raffoni, A., & Visani, F. (2018). A multidimensional approach to measuring bank branch efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(2), 746-760.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2017.10.009
  17. Mingoti, S. A. (2005). Análise de dados através de métodos de estatística multivariada: uma abordagem aplicada. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG (in Portug.).
  18. Gupta, A., & Barbu, A. (2018). Parameterized principal component analysis. Pattern Recognition, 78, 215-227.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.01.018
  19. Galustyan, M. Zh. (2016). Using the principal component method in selecting factors for forecasting the stock market in Russia. News of Tula State University. Economic and Legal Sciences, 2-1, 176-183.
  20. Bulgakov, V. E. (2017). Iterative aggregation method for solving principal component analysis problems. International Journal for Computational Civil and Structural Engineering, 13(4), 47-52.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.22337/2587-9618-2017-13-4-47-52
  21. Pasha, A. (2017). Regional Perspectives on the Multidimensional Poverty Index. World Development, 94, 268-285.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.01.013

Received 10.10.2018