Online retailers’ management system of marketing commodity policy
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 174, Issue 11-12, Pages: 69-72
Citation information:
Natorina, A. (2018). Online retailers’ management system of marketing commodity policy. Economic Annals-XXI, 174(11-12), 69-72. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V174-11
Alona Natorina
Phd (Economics),
Head of the Department of Higher Education Statistics and Analytics,
SSI «Institute of Educational Analytics»
5 Vynnychenko Str., Kyiv, 04053, Ukraine
alyonanatorina@gmail.com
ODCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-879X
Online retailers’ management system of marketing commodity policy
Abstract. Introduction. In the conditions of continuous change and bifurcations of the marketing environment, the system of management of marketing commodity policy (SMMCP) of online retailers is impacted by a set of immanent components, the inclusion of which makes it possible to multiply the efficiency of their functioning in the cyber space and timely adjust the plan to implement marketing activities. In this regard, the urgency in substantiating, systematising the immanent components (quantitative measurement) and developing practical principals relevant to the assessment of the impact of such components on the SMMCP of online retailers based on the use of a multidimensional simulation method is becoming more relevant.
The purpose of this article is to develop canonical models for assessing the impact of partial immanent components (quantitative measurement) on the SMMCP of online retailers, taking into account the corresponding latent root causes. In order to automate calculations and construct canonical models, the authors of the article use the demo version of the «STATISTICA» software package.
Results. The author of the article has substantiated and systematised the immanent components and their impact on the SMMCP of online retailers (quantitative measurement), as well as the root causes of the formation of the SMMCP of online retailers that determine the partial immanent components of impact, and explained the correlation between the corresponding attributes, giving their meaningful interpretation. Consequently, canonical models for assessing of partial immanent components of impact on the SMMCP of online retailers, the implementation of which is the basis for making effective marketing decisions and achievement of corresponding goals by applying managerial impact locally.
Conclusion. The approbation of the developed canonical models has allowed the author to single out three groups of online retailers and formulate practical recommendations with regard to further implementation of marketing activities.
Keywords: online retailers; management system of marketing commodity policy (MSMCP); immanent components of influence; latent root causes; canonical models.
JEL Classification: M16; M31; L81
Acknowledgments: The publication contains the results of studies conducted by President’s of Ukraine grant for competitive projects F75 of the State Fund for Fundamental Research.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V174-11
References
- Remane, G., Hanelt, A., Nickerson, R. C., & Kolbe, L. M. (2017). Discovering Digital Business Models in Traditional Industries. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(2), 41-51.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2016-0127 - Svahn, F., Mathiassen, L., Lindgren, R., & Kane, G. (2017). Mastering the digital innovation challenge, MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(3), 14-16.
Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317371368_
Mastering_the_Digital_Innovation_Challenge - Paulus-Rohmer, D., Schatton, H., & Bauernhansl, T. (2016). Ecosystems, strategy and business models in the age of digitization – how the manufacturing industry is going to change its logic. Procedia CRIP, 57, 8-13.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.11.003 - Foss, N. J., & Saebi, T. (2018). Business models and business model innovation: between wicked and paradigmatic problems. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 9-21.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2017.07.006 - Rachinger, M., Rauter, R., Müller, Ch., Vorraber, W., & Schirgi, E. (2018). Digitalization and its influence on business model innovation. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 20(2), 105-124.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-01-2018-0020 - The World Bank (2016). World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends. Washington: International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, The World Bank.
Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016 - Digital McKinsey (2017). Digital Reinvention. McKinsey & Company.
Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20
functions/mckinsey%20digital/our%20insights/digital%20reinvention/digital%20reinvention.ashx - Gimpel, H., & Röglinger, M. (2015). Digital Transformation. Changes and Chances – Insights based on an Empirical Study. Project Group Business and Information Systems Engineering (BISE). Augsburg, Bayreuth: Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology FIT.
Retrieved from https://www.fim-rc.de/wp-content/uploads/Fraunhofer-Studie_Digitale-Transformation.pdf - Teece, D. J. (2010). Business Models, Business Strategy and Innovation. Long Range Planning, 43(2-3), 172-194.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 - Capgemini Consulting (2018). Official web-site.
Retrieved from https://www.capgemini.com/consulting - Okumus, F. (2003). A framework to implement strategies in organizations. Management Decision, 41(9), 871-882.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740310499555 - International Business Machines Corporation (2011). Digital transformation. Creating new business models where digital meets physical. IBM Global Business Services, Executive Report. New York: IBM Institute for Business Value.
Retrieved from https://www-07.ibm.com/sg/manufacturing/pdf/manufacturing/Digital-transformation.pdf - The World Economic Forum (2016, January). Digital Transformation of Industries: In collaboration with Accenture. Digital Enterprise. World Economic Forum White Paper.
Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/digital-transformation/wp-content/blogs.dir/94/mp/files/pages/files/digital-enterprise-narrative-final-january-2016.pdf - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2017, January 12). Key issues for digital transformation in the G20. Report prepared for a joint G20 German Presidency OECD conference, Berlin.
Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/g20/key-issues-for-digital-transformation-in-the-g20.pdf - International Business Machines Corporation (2018). IBM SPSS software.
Retrieved from https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software - CGI Group (2015). Digital Customer Experience.
Retrieved from https://www.cgi.com/sites/default/files/files_cz/2_digital_customer_enablement.pdf - Makad, S. (2017, February 16). Digitalization Trends For Better Customer Service In 2017. Digitalist Magazine.
Retrieved from http://www.digitalistmag.com/customer-experience/2017/02/16/digitalization-trends-for-better-customer-service-in-2017-04906118 - Avande Inc. (2017). Point of View. Retail reinvented in the age of digital.
Retrieved from https://www.avanade.com/~/media/asset/point-of-view/avanade-retail-point-of-view.pdf - Winterhalter, S., Weiblen, T., Wecht, Ch. H., & Gassmann, O. (2017). Business model innovation processes in large corporations: insights from BASF. Journal of Business Strategy, 38(2), 62-75.
doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JBS-10-2016-0116 - Alexa Internet (2018). Find Website Traffic, Statistics, and Analytics. Keyword Research, Competitive Analysis, & Website Ranking.
Retrieved from https://www.alexa.com/siteinfo - Nichols, R. (2018, August 21). Understanding Bounce Rate to Improve It.
Retrieved from https://www.abtasty.com/blog/bounce-rate - Prom.ua (2017). A trading platform of Ukraine.
Retrieved from https://prom.ua - StatSoft – Dell Software Company (2018). Demo version of the program «STATISTICA».
Retrieved from http://www.statsoft.com/Products/STATISTICA-Features
Received 20.11.2018