Economics and management of enterprises

Urban passenger water transport: operating within public-private partnership (international research and case study)

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 178, Issue 7-8, Pages: 84-95

Citation information:
Budnyk, V., & Lernichenko, K. (2019). Urban passenger water transport: operating within public-private partnership (international research and case study). Economic Annals-XXI, 178(7-8), 84-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V178-07

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Viktoriia Budnyk
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Professor of the Department of Business-logistics and Transport Technologies,
State University of Infrastructure and Technologies
19 I. Ogienko Str., Kyiv, 02000, Ukraine
victoria92929292@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8936-0875

Kateryna Lernichenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor of the Department of Business-logistics and Transport Technologies,
State University of Infrastructure and Technologies
19 I. Ogienko Str., Kyiv, 02000, Ukraine
lkv.duit@gmail.com
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5807-5310

Urban passenger water transport: operating within public-private partnership (international research and case study)

Abstract. Introduction. There are no examples of public-private partnership (PPP) projects realization in the field of transport infrastructure development in Ukraine, as compared to the successful experience of advanced economies. Further research is needed to solve the problems of forming an effective PPP implementation mechanism, justifying the relationship between public and private partners in the process of partnership projects realization, taking into account the specific areas of PPP application, including the system of urban passenger water transport.

The purpose of the research is to create a mechanism for cooperation of urban passenger water transport (UPWT) operators with local authorities on the basis of public-private partnership in order to improve the system of urban public passenger transport.

Results. The developed mechanism of functioning of public passenger water transport enterprises on the basis of PPP should include the following tools: competitive selection of a private partner who will engage in business activities in the field of local passenger water transport services by such forms of public-private partnership agreements as concession agreements for the development of coastal infrastructure and contracts for the provision of passenger transport services; a methodical approach to assessing the potential demand for services of UPWT operators by interviewing potential consumers of transportation services; a methodical approach to mutually agreed terms of PPP agreements on the basis of evaluating the effectiveness of partnership from the standpoint of private and public parties of the agreements; algorithm of fare system formation for the services of UPWT enterprises; immediate concession agreements and contracts for transportation services.

The developed mechanism has been piloted in the field of urban passenger water transportation in Kyiv capital city which is rich with river infrastructure in two directions of transportation: shuttle transportation (as an example is the route «Domania Bay – Pivnichnyi («Northern») Bridge – Rusanivska Embankment – Dnipro metro station – Postal Square», the length is 19.50 km) and chartered transportation. It was proposed to enter into a concession agreement of the shore base constituent with the local authorities, which consists in the purchase of a pontoon and the arrangement of the coastal zone (including waiting places for passengers) in order to equip the waterfront. The calculations showed that the use of the proposed mechanism would provide private operators with a margin of 16-21%, local budgets will receive additional revenues in the form of concession fees, and in general it would also achieve social effect due to the development of urban passenger water transport and transparency of relations between private operators of UPWT and local authorities.

Conclusion. Development projects for urban passenger water transport should be implemented on the basis of mutually beneficial cooperation between private operators and local authorities through concession agreements on the maintenance and expansion of coastal infrastructure and contracts on the passenger transport services.

Keywords: Concession Agreement; Service Contract; City Passenger Water Transport; Public-Private Partnership (PPP); River Infrastructure; City Logistics; Demand Forecasting Mechanism

JEL Classіfіcatіon: В41; L33; R42

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V178-07

References

  1. Zlatoudis, A. E. (2017). Urban Sea Transportation in Greece, The case of Skiathos. Transportation Research Procedia, 24, 418-424.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.092
  2. Bovis, Ch. H. (2015). Risk in Public-Private Partnerships and Critical Infrastructure. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(2), 200-207.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24769654
  3. Budnyk, V. A., & Lernichenko, K. V. (2015). Evaluating the Performance Efficiency of the Urban Waterway Transport Enterprises, Based on Public-Private Partnership. Biznes Inform (Business Inform), 12, 157-163.
    Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/binf_2015_12_24 (in Ukr.)
  4. Burger, M., Schutter, B. De, & Hellendoorn, J. (2012). Micro-Ferry Scheduling Problem with Charging and Embarking Times. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 45(24), 95-102.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3182/20120912-3-BG-2031.00018
  5. Cabrera, M., Suárez-Alemán, A., & Trujillo, L. (2015). Public-private partnerships in Spanish Ports: Current status and future prospects. Utilities Policy, 32, 1-11.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2014.11.002
  6. Chernovetskyi, L. (2012). River Tram and Water Taxi. Official web-site.
    Retrieved from http://chernovetskiy.com.ua/mayor/projects/rechnoy-tramvay-i-vodnoe-taksi-2 (in Ukr.)
  7. European Investment Bank (2018). Market Update. Review of the European PPP Market in 2018. Luxembourg.
    Retrieved from https://www.eib.org/attachments/epec/epec_market_update_2018_en.pdf
  8. Hrelja, R., Rye, T., & Mullen, C. (2018). Partnerships between operators and public transport authorities. Working practices in relational contracting and collaborative partnerships. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 116, 327-338.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.06.032
  9. Kirichenko, L. (2017, Febryary 15). Eurovision in Kiev: in the capital, a new water transport will be operated (infographics). Segodnia.
    Retrieved from https://www.segodnya.ua/kiev/kpower/evrovidenie-v-kieve-v-stolice-poyavitsya-novyy-vodnyy-transport-infografika-813682.html (in Russ.)
  10. Kunst, I. (2011). Primjenjivost Modela Javno-Privatnih Partnerstva U Turizmu / Viability Of The Public Private Partnership Concept In Tourism. Acta Turistica, 23(2), 175-201.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23235851
  11. Leland, S., & Read, D. (2012). Stimulating Real Estate Development Through Public-Private Partnerships: Assessing The Perceived Opportunities And Challenges. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 311-340.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41804549
  12. Márquez, L., Cantillo, V., & Arellana, J. (2014). How are comfort and safety perceived by inland waterway transport passengers? Transport Policy, 36, 46-52.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.07.006
  13. Moret, M. A., Antonio, L. Q., & Pereira, H. B. B. (2012). Classical and fractal analysis of vehicle demand on the ferry-boat system. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(4), 1657-1661.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2011.10.016
  14. Smythe, T. C., & McCann, J. (2019). Achieving integration in marine governance through marine spatial planning: Findings from practice in the United States. Ocean & Coastal Management, 167(1), 197-207.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2018.10.006
  15. Soltani, A., Tanko, M., Burke, M. I., & Farid, R. (2019) Travel Patterns of Urban Linear Ferry Passengers: Analysis of Smart card Fare Data for Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2535(1), 79-87.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3141/2535-09
  16. Tanko, M., & Burke, M. I. (2017). Transport innovations and their effect on cities: the emergence of urban linear ferries worldwide. Transportation Research Procedia, 25, 3957-3970.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.483
  17. Tanko, M., Cheemarkurthy, H., Kihl, S. H., & Garme, K. (2019). Water transit passenger perceptions and planning factors: A Swedish perspective. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 23-30.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.02.002
  18. Gestel, K. V., Voets, J., & Verhoest, K. (2012). How Governance Of Complex Ppps Affects Performance. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(2), 140-188.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41506768
  19. Vesti (2015, January 16). In Kiev, a river taxi is to be launched.
    Retrieved from https://vesti.ua/kiev/85058-v-kieve-reshili-zapustit-rechnoe-taksi (in Russ.)
  20. Wiater, P. (2015). On the notion of «Partnership» in Critical Infrastructure Protection. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6(2), 255-262.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/24769659
  21. Willoughby, Ch. (2013). How much can public private partnership really do for urban transport in developing countries? Research in Transportation Economics, 40(1), 34-55.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2012.06.038
  22. Xiao, Z., & Lam, J. S. L. (2017). A systems framework for the sustainable development of a Port City: A case study of Singapore’s policies. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 22, 255-262.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.10.003
  23. Xu, H., & Morgan, K. (2012). Public-Private Partnerships For Social And Human Services: A Case Study Of Nonprofit Organizations In Alabama. Public Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 277-310.
    Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/41804548

Received 16.07.2019
Received in revised form 22.07.2019
Accepted 2.08.2019
Available online 30.09.2019

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , , , ,

More Papers