Economics and management of enterprises

Spatial visualisation of stakeholders based on cartographic methodology in management systems

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 179, Issue 9-10, Pages: 91-104

Citation information:
Závadský, J., Závadská, Z., Stępniak, C., & Stępniak, A. (2019). Spatial visualisation of stakeholders based on cartographic methodology in management systems. Economic Annals-XXI, 179(9-10), 91-104. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-08

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Ján Závadský
PhD (Economics),
Professor,
Matej Bel University
10 Tajovskeho Str., Banska Bystrica, 97590, Slovak Republic
jan.zavadsky@umb.sk
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-3290

Zuzana Závadská
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
College of International Business ISM Slovakia in Prešov
1 Duchnovičovo namestie Str., Prešov, 08001, Slovak Republic
zavadska@ismpo.sk
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4808-8585

Cezary Stępniak
PhD (Management and Quality Science),
Faculty of Management,
Częstochowa University of Technology (Politechnika Częstochowska)
69 J. H. Dąbrowskiego Str., Częstochowa, 42-201, Poland
cezary.stepniak@wz.pcz.pl
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4833-6411

Aida Stępniak
PhD Student (Management and Quality Science),
MA (Management),
Faculty of Management,
Częstochowa University of Technology (Politechnika Częstochowska)
69 J. H. Dąbrowskiego Str., Częstochowa, 42-201, Poland
ainethegenie@op.pl
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7731-4046

Spatial visualisation of stakeholders based on cartographic methodology in management systems

Abstract. This study presents a model of a tool for spatial visualization of processes occurring in the stakeholder environment concerning relationship management according to the ISO standards for management systems. Spatial visualization is based on cartographic methodology extended with technological capabilities used in GIS (Geographic Information Systems) systems.

Thanks to the method, different types of issues using environment maps can be presented. This paper proposes a model of a tool enabling multi-criteria spatial visualization of states, phenomena, processes and plans taking place in the discussed environment.

The proposed model of visualization is to be used in the future to present the results of research in the discussed field. They concern stakeholder relationship management according to the ISO management systems. Appropriate technology is required for the application of the model.

The study is part of a stream of works aimed at using the concept of space to describe various sections of reality. It may have both theoretical implications (visualizations based on spatial models), as well as practical ones related to popularizing the use of various types of space to describe phenomena and planning.

The originality of this study is that the present model-based visualization features selected stakeholders within the ISO standards. As part of the visualization example, heuristic spaces were defined, on which objects representing different types of stakeholders were placed, their significance as part of the ISO standard being determined according to each of the features: power, interest and predictability. The data was obtained in a branch of an international corporation operating in the packaging industry.

Keywords: Spatial Visualisation; Interested Parties; Stakeholder Relationship Management; Heuristic Space; Corporation; Packaging Industry

JEL Classification: M14; M19

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-08

References

  1. Albuquerque, H., Costa, C., & Martins, F. (2018). The use of Geographical Information Systems for Tourism Marketing purposes in Aveiro region (Portugal). Tourism Management Perspectives, 26, 172-178.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2017.10.009
  2. Anttila, J., & Jussila, K. (2017). Understanding quality – conceptualization of the fundamental concepts of quality. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 9(3-4), 251-268.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2017-0020
  3. Atila, U., Karaş, I. R., & Rahman, A. A. (2014). A Knowledge Based Decision Support System: 3D GIS Implementation for Indoor Visualisation and Routing Simulation. Knowledge Management International Conference (KMICe2014) (pp. 968-971). Langkawi, Malaysia.
    Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Knowledge-Based-Decision-Support-System%3A-3D-GIS-Atila-Karas/7182d94220d25dc36bf61e7016b25119aeb9291d
  4. Baños, R., Wandosell, G., & Parra, M. C. (2016). Web GIS to enhance relational capital: the case of general merchandise retailers. Journal of Knowledge Management, 20(3), 578-593.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-06-2015-0218
  5. Barouch, G., & Kleinhans, S. (2015). Learning from criticisms of quality management. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 7(2-3), 201-216.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2015-0026
  6. Bentley, L. D., & Whitten, J. L. (2008). Systems analysis & design for the global enterprise. Beijing: Higher Education Press.
  7. Bernardes, S., Madden, M., Knight, A., Neel, N., Morgan, N., Cameron, K., & Knox, J. (2018). A multi-component system for data acquisition and visualization in the geosciences based on IAVS, augmented and virtual reality. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLII-4, 45-49.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-4-45-2018
  8. Carrizosa, E., Guerrero, V., & Romero Morales, D. (2019). Visualization of complex dynamic datasets by means of mathematical optimization. Omega, 86(C), 125-136.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.008
  9. Cronemyr, P., Bäckström, I., & Rönnbäck, Å. (2017). Quality culture deployment – using behaviours to explain, diagnose and improve a quality culture. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 9(3-4), 498-518.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-02-2017-0008
  10. del Rio-Ortega A., Resinas, M., & Ruiz-Cortes, A. (2010). Defining Process Performance Indicators: An Ontological Approach. In R. Meersman T. Dillon, & P. Herrero, P. (Eds.). On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2010. OTM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 6426, (pp. 555-572). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
    Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-16934-2_41
  11. Gardony, A. L., Martis, S. B., Taylor, H. A., & Brunyé, T. (2018). Interaction Strategies for Effective Augmented Reality Geo-Visualization: Insights from Spatial Cognition. Human-Computer Interaction, 1-43.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07370024.2018.1531001
  12. Jurado, J. M., Graciano, A., Ortega, L., & Feito, F. R. (2017). Web-based GIS application for real-time interaction of underground infrastructure through virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM SIGSPATIAL International Conference on Advances in Geographic Information Systems (SIGSPATIAL’17), 97, 1-4. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, USA.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1145/3139958.3140004
  13. Kaneko, M. (2016). A method for diagnosing healthcare provision process based on failure cases. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 8(3), 334-344.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-04-2016-0034
  14. Kita, P., Szczyrba, Z., Fiedor, D., & Letal, A. (2018). Recognition of business risks when purchasing goods on the Internet using GIS: experience from Slovakia. Electronic Commerce Research, 18, 647-663.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-017-9276-5
  15. Kumar, V., Kim, D.-Y., & Kumar, U. (2012). Quality management in research and development. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4(2), 156-174.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691211232891
  16. Lilja, J., Hansen, D., Fredrikson, J., & Richardsson, D. (2017). Is innovation the future of quality management? Searching for signs of quality and innovation management merging. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 9(3-4), 232-240.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-03-2017-0024
  17. Looser, S., & Wehrmeyer, W. (2015). Stakeholder mapping of CSR in Switzerland. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(4), 780-830.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-06-2014-0071
  18. Moscicka, A. K. (2017). The CENDARI infrastructure in GIS-based historical research. Program: electronic library and information systems, 51(2), 132-151.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/PROG-09-2015-0058
  19. Perez Jimenez, R. J., Martin-Delgado Becerril, E., Mohd Nor, R., Smagas, K., Valari, E., & Stylianidis, E. (2016). Market potential for a location based and augmented reality system for utilities management. 2016 22nd International Conference on Virtual System & Multimedia (VSMM) (pp. 1-4). Kuala Lumpur.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/VSMM.2016.7863171
  20. Pigott, D. J., & Hobbs, V. J. (2011). Complex knowledge modelling with functional entity relationship diagrams. VINE, 41(2), 192-211.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721111134817
  21. Rodríguez-Mantilla, J., Fernández-Cruz, F., & Fernández-Díaz, M. (2019). Comparative analysis between management team and teachers on the impact of ISO 9001 standards in educational centres. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 11(2), 248-264.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQSS-06-2018-0057
  22. Rönnbäck, Å., & Eriksson, H. (2012). A case study on quality management and digital innovation: Relationship and learning aspects. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 4(4), 408-422.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17566691211288386
  23. Rönnbäck, Å., Witell, L., & Enquist, B. (2009). Quality management systems and value creation. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences, 1(3) 241-254.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/17566690911004186
  24. Sánchez Riera, A., Redondo, E., & Fonseca, D. (2015). Geo-located teaching using handheld augmented reality: good practices to improve the motivation and qualifications of architecture students. Universal Access in the Information Society, 14(3), 363-374.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-014-0362-3
  25. Sherin, A., McKenna, J., Boudreau, P., Kennedy, M., & MacGillivray, B. (2017). Spatial Visualization of Publicly Accessible Species Occurrence Data. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards 1, e20155.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3897/tdwgproceedings.1.20155
  26. Skinner, P., Ventura, J., & Zollmann, S. (2018). Indirect Augmented Reality Browser for GIS Data. 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), ( pp. 145-150). Munich, Germany.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00054
  27. Stępniak, C. (2018). Utility of spatial description for evaluation of presumption effects on examples of IT companies. Informatyka Ekonomiczna (Business Informatics), 49(3) 89-109.
    Retrieved from http://bazekon.icm.edu.pl/bazekon/element/bwmeta1.element.ekon-element-000171557798 (in Pol.)
  28. Weckenmann, A., Akkasoglu, G., & Werner, T. (2015). Quality management – history and trends. The TQM Journal, 27(3), 281-293.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-11-2013-0125
  29. Yang, B., Chen, D., Ren, B., & Wu, Y. (2016). Application of GIS and 3D Visualization Simulation in Irrigation Management System-An effective solution of visualization and dynamic for water resourses management. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Simulation and Modelling, (pp. 219- 222).
    doi: https://doi.org/10.2991/amsm-16.2016.50

Received 18.08.2019
Received in revised form 7.09.2019
Accepted 15.09.2019
Available online 11.11.2019

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , ,

More Papers