Taxation, economic growth and welfare in a low-income country

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 181, Issue 1-2, Pages: 44-56

Citation information:
Krysovatyy, A., Fedosov, V., Tymchenko, O., & Silchenko, M. (2020). Taxation, economic growth and welfare in a low-income country. Economic Annals-XXI, 181(1-2), 44-56. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V181-04


Andriy Krysovatyy
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor, Rector,
Ternopil National Economic University
11 Lvivska Str., Ternopil, 46020, Ukraine
rektor@tneu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5850-8224

Viktor Fedosov
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
finance_kneu@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1092-4218

Olena Tymchenko
D.Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
o_tymchenko@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8143-1261

Maryna Silchenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
silchenkomv@kneu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-2561

Taxation, economic growth and welfare in a low-income country

Abstract. Tax policy should promote not only economic growth but also the well-being of citizens. Otherwise, the problem of economic growth will arise again. This issue is relevant for many low-income countries. The governments of such countries can achieve some GDP growth and stabilize public finances. However, if such growth is accompanied by impoverishment of the population that is unable to meet the corresponding consumer demand, it leads to GDP fall and lack of financial resources.

We seek to find out how the tax burden and tax structure affect economic growth and welfare in Ukraine taking into account international experience. For this purpose, we analyze the correlation between the tax burden and GDP and based on the method of chain substitutions reveal the impact of the compensation of employees (salaries), taxes and gross surplus on GDP growth and confirm our main hypothesis that the tax burden increase does not lead to GDP reduction in Ukraine. There is a direct connection between the tax burden and GDP in Ukraine. The GDP decreases with a lowering in the tax burden and, accordingly, grows with its increase.

Such correlation complicates the decision-making on further improvement of the tax system of Ukraine to realize the purpose of sustainable economic grows. On the one hand, in comparison with other countries the tax burden in Ukraine is not much higher, but it is criticized by the business. On the other hand, the Ukrainian Government has a permanent problem which is a lack of necessary resources for funding public expenditures. Therefore, when making decisions, the impact of certain types of taxes and changes in the tax structure should be taken into account.

The study showed that the corporate income tax rates reduction had a positive effect on investment dynamics, and excise taxes increase has led to the reduction of legal production and increase of shadow sector. VAT (20%) has a neutral effect on GDP growth in Ukraine, while the introduction of 7% VAT on medicines has led to an increase in prices and changed the structure of consumption towards the low-priced goods. The changes (increase) in personal income taxation have reduced consumer demand and hampered GDP growth and welfare.

The authors give the recommendations regarding changes in the tax policy of Ukraine based at own empirical findings and with regard to the current institutional peculiarities of Ukraine.

Keywords: Tax; Tax Policy; Tax Burden; Economic Growth; Well-Being; VAT; VAT on Medicines; Ukraine; Low-Income Country

JEL Classification: G28; H20; H24

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V181-04

References

  1. Alves, J. (2019). The impact of tax structure on investment: an empirical assessment for OECD countries. Public Sector Economics, 43(3), 291-309.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3326/pse.43.3.4
  2. Balcerzak, A. (2016). Fiscal Burden in the European Union Member States. Economic Annals-XXI, 164(9-10), 4-6.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V161-01
  3. Barro, R. J., & Furman, J. (2018). The macroeconomic effects of the 2017 tax reform. Brookings papers on economic activity. BPEA Conference Drafts, March 8-9, 2018, 1-70.
    Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/4_barrofurman.pdf
  4. BEA (2020). Gross Domestic Product, Fourth Quarter and Year 2019 (Advance Estimate).
    Retrieved from https://www.bea.gov/news/2020/gross-domestic-product-fourth-quarter-and-year-2019-advance-estimate
  5. Chernick, H., Reimers, C., & Tennant, J. (2014). Tax structure and revenue instability: the Great Recession and the states. IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 3.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-9004-3-3
  6. Cloyne, J. (2013). Discretionary Tax Changes and the Macroeconomy: New Narrative Evidence from the United Kingdom. American Economic Review, 103(4), 1507-1528.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.4.1507
  7. Dmytryk, K. (2019). Pharmaceutical market of Ukraine 2019-2020: diagnosis and forecast. Apteka (Pharmacy), 1207(36).
    Retrieved from https://www.apteka.ua/article/515352 (in Ukr.)
  8. EBA (2019). The infographic reference book «Pharmaceuticals Industry of Ukraine 2019».
    Retrieved from https://eba.com.ua/infografichnyj-dovidnyk-farmatsevtyka-ukrayiny-2019 (in Ukr.)
  9. Fedosos, V., Tymchenko, O., & Babichenko, V. (2019). Tax transformation effects. Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice, 2(29), 462-475.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i29.172216
  10. Gale, W. (2019). A fixable mistake: The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Bookings.
    Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2019/09/25/a-fixable-mistake-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act
  11. Gil, P., Martí, F., Morris, R., Pérez, J., & Ramos, R. (2019). The output effects of tax changes: narrative evidence from Spain. SERIEs, 10, 1-23.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13209-018-0173-5
  12. Grdinić, M., Drezgić, S., & Blažić, H. (2017). An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Tax Structures and Economic Growth in CEE Countries. Ekonomický časopis, 65, 426-447.
    Retrieved from https://www.sav.sk/journals/uploads/0615125505%2017%20Grdini%c4%87%20+%20RS.pdf
  13. Hayo, B., & Uhl, M. (2014). The macroeconomic effects of legislated tax changes in Germany. Oxford Economic Papers, 66(2), 397-418.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpt017
  14. Jones, P., Olson, E., & Wohar, M. (2015). Asymmetric tax multipliers. Journal of Macroeconomics, 43, 38-48.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2014.08.006
  15. Lee, Y., & Gordon, R. (2005). Tax structure and economic growth. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 1027-1043.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.07.002
  16. Mathur, A. (2019). Don’t give up on the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act just yet. AEIdeas.
    Retrieved from https://www.aei.org/economics/dont-give-up-on-the-tax-cuts-and-jobs-act-just-yet
  17. Matviychuk-Soskina, N., Krysovatyy, A., Zvarych, I., Zvarych, R., & Ivashchuk, I. (2019). «Sea star wasting syndrome» or alterglobalization, inclusiveness and circular economy: priorities of the plan «B» for the planet. Economic Annals-XXI, 179(9-10), 4-21.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-01
  18. McNabb, K. (2018). Tax Structures and Economic Growth: New Evidence from the Government Revenue Dataset. Journal of International development, 30(2), 173-205.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.3345
  19. McNabb, K., & LeMay-Boucher, Ph. (2014). Tax Structures, Economic Growth and Development. ICTD Working Paper 22.
    Retrieved from https://www.ictd.ac/publication/tax-structures-economic-growth-and-development
  20. OECD (2018). Tax policies for inclusive growth in a changing world. Report to G-20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors.
    Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/g20/Tax-policies-for-inclusive-growth-in-a-changing-world-OECD.pdf
  21. Sidorova, E., & Tikhonova, A. (2017). Assessment of the fiscal effect of the tax reform options until 2019: the case of Russia. Economic Annals-XXI, 164(3-4), 45-48.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V164-10
  22. Sims, E., & Wolff, J. (2018). The state-dependent effects of tax shocks. European Economic Review, 107, 57-85.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2018.05.002
  23. State Statistics Service of Ukraine (2001-2019). Statistical information.
    Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua (in Ukr.)
  24. State Treasury Service of Ukraine (2001-2019). The Budget Statement.
    Retrieved from https://www.treasury.gov.ua/ua/file-storage/vikonannya-derzhavnogo-byudzhetu (in Ukr.)
  25. Stoilova, D. (2017). Tax structure and economic growth: Evidence from the European Union. Accounting and Management, 62(3), 1041-1057.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cya.2017.04.006
  26. Subochev, O., & Kiyan, E. (2019). Alcohol market. Biznes v oficiinykh cyfrakh (Business in official figures).
    Retrieved from https://rating.zone/rynok-alkoholnoi-produktsii (in Ukr.)
  27. Ukrinform (2020). The budget for two years has not received 25 billion from the «shadow market» of fuel.
    Retrieved from https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-economy/2886205-budzet-za-dva-roki-nedootrimav-25-milardiv-vid-tinovogo-rinku-palnogo-packan.html (in Ukr.)
  28. UNIAN (2011). In Ukraine, the poor pay 50 times more taxes than the rich.
    Retrieved from https://www.unian.ua/society/579396-v-ukrajini-bidni-platyat-u-50-raziv-bilshe-podatkiv-anij-bagati.html (in Ukr.)
  29. Vatavu, S., Lobont, O. R., Stefea, P., & Brindescu-Olariu, D. (2019). How Taxes Relate to Potential Welfare Gain and Appreciable Economic Growth. Sustainability, 11(15), 4094.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154094
  30. Vinokurov, J. (2019). Cabinet of Ministers: half of the alcohol market in Ukraine is in the shadows, and the state is short of UAH 10 billion.
    Retrieved from https://hromadske.ua/posts/kabmin-polovina-rinku-alkogolyu-v-ukrayini-u-tini-a-derzhava-nedootrimuye-do-10-mlrd-grn (in Ukr.)
  31. Wielen, W. (2019). The Macroeconomic Eects of Tax Reform: Evidence from the EU. JRC Working Papers on Taxation and Structural Reforms, 4.
    Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/jrc116961.pdf
  32. Zidar, O. (2015).Tax Cuts For Whom? Heterogeneous Effects of Income Tax Changes on Growth and Employment. NBER Working Paper Series, 21035, 1-95.
    doi: https://doi.org/10.3386/w21035

Received 14.11.2019
Received in revised form 21.12.2019
Accepted 12.01.2020
Available online 10.02.2020
Updated version of the paper as of 20.04.2020