Environmental risks and sustainable development indicators: determinants of impact
Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 185, Issue 9-10, Pages: 4-14
Citation information:
Sushchenko, O., Volkovskyi, Ie., Fedosov, V., & Ryazanova, N. (2020). Environmental risks and sustainable development indicators: determinants of impact. Economic Annals-XXI, 185(9-10), 4-14. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V185-01
Oleksandr Sushchenko
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
sushchenko@kneu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6364-5656
Ievgen Volkovskyi
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
cbvs_ev@kneu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-919X
Viktor Fedosov
D. Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
finance_kneu@ukr.net
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1092-4218
Nadiya Ryazanova
D. Sc. (Economics),
Professor,
Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman
54/1 Peremohy Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine
nryazanova@kneu.edu.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1419-1189
Environmental risks and sustainable development indicators: determinants of impact
Abstract. The concept of sustainable development brought new constraints for the old-fashioned business models. At the same time, it created new opportunities for those who have a forward-looking strategy and strive to overcome «the limits to growth», in other words, to ensure a long-term blended value creation with economic and non-economic benefits.
There are numerous sets of the sustainable development indicators and indices, but the weights of each particular component are different and need further clarification. Nowadays, the environmental risks in general and climate-related in particular are priced (e.g. environmental taxes) and have a strong impact on the social and economic relations by creating negative and positive externalities for our daily life. For this reason, economic agents are forced to become sustainable to the non-financial risks through switching to the new environmental and social business models. For this reason, better sustainable development indicators are crucial for an improved management of the non-financial risks and sustainable blended value creation.
Hence, the aim of this paper is to examine the role of environmental risks in shaping sustainable development conditions on the macrolevel and to elaborate the ways for a better management of the non-financial risks (Environmental, Social and Governance – ESG). For this purpose, the impact of the most important environmental risks on the main economic and social indicators has been examined (e.g. Human Development Index and GDP per capita). Such an approach allowed us to identify the extent to which specific environmental factors influencing social and economic development can reshape the sustainable development conditions.
In course of research, two sets of countries have been singled out to verify statistical significance of elaborated models. To achieve this goal, the authors have split an available dataset into two groups: EU and non-EU countries. The reason behind it is the fact that EU countries are among the leaders in the area of sustainable development and have already undertaken related environmental improvements in the last decades. Moreover, the above-mentioned countries are continuing such successful pathways today and with the new European Green Deal could go even far beyond this frontier.
The results of current research suggest that existing indicators cannot fully encompass all the aspects of sustainable development and should be revised. Such findings relate both to the composition of the indicators and the weights attributed to each particular component. The application of regression analysis showed that such factors as water and air quality and biodiversity have the strongest explanatory power – 67% of the fluctuations in GDP per capita and 87% in case of HDI. The R -squared is ranging from 0.7 to 0.8 in both cases and confirms consistency of the elaborated models. To verify the results achieved, the similar models have been prepared only for the EU countries. As a result, all independent variables demonstrated the same significant impact on GDP per capita also for the EU countries. However, in this case the R -squared is only 0.27 due to the fact that ESG indicators within the EU area are rather homogenous. The impact of environmental factors on the level of HDI for the EU countries is much stronger comparing to GDP per capita. An overall explanatory power of the model for the EU countries exceeds 0.45 (R -squared). The most influential factor is the quality of water resources. Other important independent variables in the model for the EU member states are biodiversity and air quality.
The authors argue that it is necessary to incorporate the above-mentioned environmental factors into the updated version of the Human Development Index as the most appropriate indicators of sustainable development. Consequently, the weights of the components should be recalculated to improve management of the non-financial risks on macrolevel, facilitating the blended value creation process.
Keywords: Sustainable Development; Environmental Risks; Blended Value Creation; Human Development Index; Environmental Performance Index
JEL Classification: Q01; Q51
Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.
Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V185-01
References
- Banzhaf, H. S., & Randall, P. W. (2008). Do People Vote with Their Feet? An Empirical Test of Tiebout’s. American Economic Review, 98(3), 843-863.
https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.98.3.843 - Becker, R. A. (2005). Air Pollution Abatement Costs Under the Clean Air Act: Evidence from the PACE Survey. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50(1), 144-169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.09.001 - Biggeri, M., & Mauro, V. (2018). Towards a more «Sustainable» Human Development Index: Integrating the environment and freedom. Ecological Indicators, 91, 220-231.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.045 - Chapko, M. K., & Solomon, H. (1976). Air Pollution and Recreational Behaviour. Journal of Social Psychology, 100(1), 149-150.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1976.9711919 - Crocker, T. D., Robert, L., & Horst, Jr. (1981). Hours of Work, Labor Productivity, and Environmental Conditions: A Case Study. Review of Economics and Statistics, 63(3), 361-368.
https://doi.org/10.2307/1924353 - Daly, H., & Cobb, J. (1989). For the Common Good. (2nd ed., updated and expanded). Boston: Beacon Press.
- Duffy-Deno, K. T. (1992). Pollution Abatement Expenditures and Regional Manufacturing Activity. Journal of Regional Science, 32(4), 419-436.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1992.tb00198.x - Estrada, F., Tol, R. S. J., & Gay-Garcia, C. (2015). The persistence of shocks in GDP and the estimation of the potential economic costs of climate change. Environmental Modelling & Software, 69, 155-165.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.03.010 - Everett, T., Ishwaran, M., Ansaloni, G. P., & Rubin, A. (2010). Economic Growth and the Environment. Defra.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/
system/uploads/attachment_data/file/69195/pb13390-economic-growth-100305.pdf - Greenstone, M., List, J. A., & Syverson, C. (2012, September). The Effects of Environmental Regulation on the Competitiveness of U.S. Manufacturing. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 18392.
https://doi.org/10.3386/w18392 - Hoffren, J. (2001). Measuring the Eco-efficiency of Welfare Generation in a National Economy’. Statistics Finland, 233, 107-109.
- Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: synthesis report, 4th assessment report. Geneva Switzerland.
https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/ar4_syr_full_report.pdf - Islam, S. (1995). The human development index and per capita GDP. Applied Economics Letters, 2(5), 166-167,
http://doi.org/10.1080/135048595357537 - Johri, M., Sylvestre, M.-P., Koné, G. K., Chandra, D., & Subramanian, S. V. (2019). Effects of improved drinking water quality on early childhood growth in rural Uttar Pradesh, India: A propensity-score analysis. PLOS ONE, 14(1).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209054 - Martínez-Guido, S. I., González-Campos, J. B., & Ponce-Ortega, J. M. (2019). Strategic Planning to Improve the Human Development Index in Disenfranchised Communities through Satisfying Food, Water and Energy Needs. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 117, 14-29.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2019.06.007 - Matviychuk-Soskina, N., Krysovatyy, A., Zvarych, I., Zvarych, R., & Ivashchuk, I. (2019). «Sea star wasting syndrome» or alterglobalization, inclusiveness and circular economy: priorities of the plan «B» for the planet. Economic Annals-XXI, 179(9-10), 4-21.
https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V179-01 - Mohmmed, A., Li, Z., Olushola Arowolo, A., Su, H., Deng, X., Najmuddin, O., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Driving factors of CO2 emissions and nexus with economic growth, development and human health in the Top Ten emitting countries. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 148, 157-169.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.048 - Okorogbona, A. O. M., Denner, F. D. N., Managa, L. R., Khosa, T. B., Maduwa, K., Adebola, P. O., & Macevele, S., (2018). Water Quality Impacts on Agricultural Productivity and Environment. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, 27, 1-35.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75190-0_1 - Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2016, June). The economic consequences of outdoor air pollution.
https://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/Policy-Highlights-Economic-consequences-of-outdoor-air-pollution-web.pdf - Pao, H.-T., & Tsai, C.-M., (2011). Multivariate Granger causality between CO2 emissions, energy consumption, FDI (foreign direct investment) and GDP (gross domestic product): Evidence from a panel of BRIC (Brazil, Russian Federation, India, and China) countries. Energy, 36(1), 685-693.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.09.041 - Stern, N. (2006). The economics of climate change: the stern review, report to the cabinet office, HM treasury. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511817434 - The World Economic Forum (WEF). (2020, January 15). The Global Risks Report 2020.
https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2020 - The Yale Center for Environmental Law & Policy (YCELP). (2018). 2018 Environmental Performance Index.
https://epi.yale.edu/downloads/epi2018policymakerssummaryv01.pdf - United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2016). Human Development Report. Human Development for Everyone.
http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2016_human_development_report.pdf - United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2018). Human Development Indices and Indicators. 2018 Statistical Update.
http://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/2018_human_development_statistical_update.pdf - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2017). Roadmap for a Sustainable Financial System. Executive Summary.
http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Roadmap_for_a_Sustainable_Financial_System_ES.pdf - United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2018). Making Waves. Aligning the financial System with Sustainable development.
http://unepinquiry.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Making_Waves.pdf - United Nations Sustainable Development Solutions Network (UNSDSN). (2019). Sustainable Development Report 2019. Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals.
https://s3.amazonaws.com/sustainabledevelopment.report/2020/
2020_sustainable_development_report.pdf - Wang, Z., Danish, Zhang, B., & Wang, B. (2018). Renewable energy consumption, economic growth and human development index in Pakistan: Evidence form simultaneous equation model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 1081-1090.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.260 - Zadek, S., & Kharas, H. (2018). Aligning financial system architecture and innovation with sustainable development.
https://www.g20-insights.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/aligning-financial-system-architecture-and-innovation-with-sustainable-development-1532510004.pdf
Received 2.10.2020
Received in revised form 11.10.2020
Accepted 12.10.2020
Available online 21.11.2020
Updated version of the paper as of 27.12.2020