Economic problems of dual quality of everyday consumer goods

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 185, Issue 9-10, Pages: 70-78

Citation information:
Závadský, J., & Hiadlovský, V. (2020). Economic problems of dual quality of everyday consumer goods. Economic Annals-XXI, 185(9-10), 70-78. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V185-07


Jan Zavadsky
PhD (Economics),
Professor,
Matej Bel University
10 Tajovskeho Str., Banska Bystrica, 975 90, Slovak Republic
jan.zavadsky@umb.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4773-3290

Vladimir Hiadlovsky
PhD (Economics),
Associate Professor,
Matej Bel University
10 Tajovskeho Str., Banska Bystrica, 975 90, Slovak Republic
vladimir.hiadlovsky@umb.sk
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7800-7083

Economic problems of dual quality of everyday consumer goods

Abstract. The dual quality of everyday consumer goods has been proven in the EU, although a geographical pattern dividing the EU into eastern and western parts has not been confirmed. This practice of some manufacturers is mainly mentioned from legislative and ethical points of view, yet its economic impact is also not negligible. It often happens that a consumer buys goods in his country in the same or very similar packaging as consumers abroad, however with a different composition (made with lower quality cheaper raw materials, containing a smaller proportion of basic raw materials or with a lower content of goods). The consumer can thus ask why he gets less or a lower quality product for his/her money than consumers abroad. In our research, we focused on Slovak consumers’ perception of the economic dimension of dual quality. According to the results of a survey of 987 respondents, 89% of the respondents have heard of dual quality and 84% of the respondents are concerned about this practice. Most of the respondents (44%) consider it to be an economic problem precisely because of the use of cheaper raw materials and other proportions of basic raw materials in goods. Based on the research results, we propose to incorporate a comparison of prices for goods (in terms of price per unit weight of goods and taking into account the quality and the price of raw materials used) into the uniform methodology of testing goods for dual quality adopted by the European Commission. Furthermore, we propose to include information on dual quality of goods and the use of different raw materials (which are locally available or are allowed in the country and facilitate the processing procedure) on the packaging, which should be taken into account in pricing.

Keywords: Dual Quality; Everyday Consumer Goods; Price

JEL Classification: Q18; M38; M31

Acknowledgements and Funding: This contribution was supported by the project No. 1/0757/18, «Consumer behaviour in buying goods of daily consumption with an emphasis placed different contents of goods offered on markets of selected EU countries».

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V185-07

References 

  1. AsktheEU. (2018). Summary of studies on quality differentiation of products.
    https://www.asktheeu.org/fr/request/4975/response/16130/attach/18/
    Annex%20II%20item%2034%20Ares%202018%20730274.pdf
  2. Barbu, P. (2019, June 24). EU dual food quality study: Same packaging, different composition for nearly a third of products. Business Review.
    http://business-review.eu/news/eu-dual-food-quality-study-same-packaging-different-composition-for-nearly-a-third-of-products-202550
  3. Bartková, L. (2011). Support of corporate social responsibility in Slovak Republic. In Š. Majatán et al. (Eds.), Current views on competitiveness and entrepreneurship – new challenges (pp. 17-22). Bratislava: Ekonóm (in Slovak).
  4. Bartková, L. (2019). How do consumers perceive the dual quality of goods and its economic aspects in the European Union? An empirical study. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 17(3), 382-394.
    https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.17(3).2019.31
  5. Bartková, L., & Veselovská, L. (2020). The impact of the media on the perception of dual quality goods in the European Union. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubic, 28(2), 1064.
    https://doi.org/10.46585/SP28021064
  6. Bartková, L., Veselovská, L., & Zimermanová, K. (2018). Possible solutions to dual quality of products in the European Union. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice, 26(44), 5-16.
    https://fes.upce.cz/sites/default/files/public/mika0267/scipap_44_125023.pdf
  7. ČTK. (2017). The dual quality of food is a matter of national inspections, Jourová said.
    https://www.idnes.cz/ekonomika/test-a-spotrebitel/jourova-dvoji-kvalitu-potravin-by-mely-resit-narodni-inspekce.A170317_163453_test_rts (in Czech)
  8. dTest. (2018). Comparison of Rama at our country and abroad.
    https://www.dtest.cz/clanek-6643/srovnani-ramy-u-nas-a-u-sousedu-dtest-4-2018 (in Czech)
  9. European Commission. (2018). Framework for selecting and testing of food products to assess quality related characteristics: EU harmonised testing methodology.
    https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/sites/jrcsh/files/eu_harmonised_testing_methodology_-_framework_
    for_selecting_and_testing_of_food_products_to_assess_quality_related_characteristics.pdf
  10. European Commission. (2019). Dual Food Quality: Questions and Answers.
    https://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_QANDA-19-3333_en.htm
  11. European Parliament. (2005). Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2005/29/oj
  12. European Parliament. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/2161 of the European Parliament and of the Council 2019/2161 of 27 November 2019 amending Council Directive 93/13/EEC and Directives 98/6/EC, 2005/29/EC and 2011/83/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards the better enforcement and modernisation of Union consumer protection rules.
    https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2019/2161/oj
  13. Forbes. (2019, October 9). Poles buy worse quality of food than Germany. UOKiK has no doubts. Forbes.
    https://www.forbes.pl/handel/polacy-kupuja-gorsze-jedzenie-niz-niemcy-badanie-uokik/p2n9mgg (in Pol.)
  14. Joint Research Centre. (2019). Results of an EU wide comparison of quality related characteristics of food products.
    https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC117088/eur29778
    en_results_of_an_eu_wide_comparison_of_quality_related_characteristics_of_food_products.pdf
  15. Kořínek, D., & Hovorka, J. (2015, July 1). Test of foodstuffs: The same brands have different composition than in Germany. Aktualně.cz.
    https://zpravy.aktualne.cz/ekonomika/test-potravin-stejne-znacky-maji-jine-slozeni-nez-v-nemecku/r~021f2be81f2911e5b1d8002590604f2e (in Czech)
  16. Marchuk, U., & Fabiianska, V. (2017). Product quality as a condition for maximisation of profit: accounting and control aspects. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 85-90.
    https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-18
  17. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic. (2017). Confirmed: The same products have different composition in the Slovak Republic and in Austria.
    https://www.mpsr.sk/index.php?navID=1&navID2=1&sID=111&id=11185 (in Slovak)
  18. Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of the Slovak Republic. (2018). Member countries will unify in testing foodstuffs of dual quality.
    https://www.mpsr.sk/clenske-staty-sa-zjednotia-v-testovani-potravin-na-dvojaku-kvalitu/52—12867 (in Slovak)
  19. Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs of the Slovak Republic. (2017). Dual quality of foodstuffs: what is the difference?
    https://www.mzv.sk/detail-aktuality/-/asset_publisher/Hp2qxsn2Z6I5/content/dvojita-kvalita-potravin-v-com-je-rozdiel- (in Slovak)
  20. Ministry of Industry and Trade of the Czech Republic. (2019). Dual Quality of Products – Comparative tests of foods on the common EU market.
    https://www.mpo.cz/en/consumer-protection/eu-and-the-consumer/dual-quality-of-products—comparative-tests-of-foods-on-the-common-eu-market—247385
  21. Mints, A., Schumann, A., & Kamyshnykova, E. (2020). Stakeholders’ rank of reflexion diagnostics in a corporate social responsibility system. Economic Annals-XXI, 181(1-2), 92-104.
    https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V181-08
  22. Natorina, A. (2017). Congruent marketing product strategies of the enterprises. Economic Annals-XXI, 163(1-2), 75-78.
    https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V163-16
  23. Niamh, M. (2017, September 26). Croatian survey: Dual quality and price affects 85% of sampled products. Foodnavigator.
    https://www.foodnavigator.com/Article/2017/09/04/Croatian-survey-Dual-quality-and-price-affects-85-of-sampled-products
  24. Office of Competition and Consumer Protection of Poland. (2018). Good because German? Results of UOKiK tests.
    https://www.uokik.gov.pl/aktualnosci.php?news_id=14842 (in Pol.)
  25. Sisto, R., Pellegrini, G., & La Sala, P. (2019). Dual quality food: A negative social externality or a competitiveness opportunity? Agricultural Economics, 65(7), 307-313.
    https://doi.org/10.17221/307/2018-AGRICECON
  26. Sladkovská, I. (2017, October 2). New tests of foodstuffs dual quality: It is still worse. Aktuality.
    https://www.aktuality.sk/clanok/526079/nove-testy-dvojakej-kvality-potravin-je-to-coraz-horsie (in Slovak)
  27. The European Consumer Organization (BEUC). (2018). Dual product quality across Europe: State-of-play and the way forward.
    https://www.beuc.eu/publications/beuc-x-2018-031_beuc_position_paper_on_dual_quality.pdf
  28. The Sofia Globe. (2019, May 14). Bulgaria’s Consumer Protection Commission to launch new probe into dual standards in food.
    https://sofiaglobe.com/2019/05/14/bulgarias-consumer-protection-commission-to-launch-new-probe-into-dual-standards-in-food

Received 22.08.2020
Received in revised form 10.09.2020
Accepted 16.09.2020
Available online 21.11.2020