Economics and management of enterprises

Assessment of metallurgical enterprises’ activities in Kazakhstan in the context of international trends

Economic Annals-XXI

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 187, Issue 1-2, Pages: 121-130

Citation information:
Aubakirova, G., Rudko, G., & Isataeva, F. (2021). Assessment of metallurgical enterprises activities in Kazakhstan in the context of international trends. Economic Annals-XXI, 187(1-2), 121-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-12

View Full-TextDownload PDF

Gulnara Aubakirova
D.Sc. (Economy),
Professor,
Karaganda Technical University
11 Nazarbayev Ave., Karaganda, 100008, Republic of Kazakhstan
rendykar@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0337-1539

Georgiy Rudko
D.Sc. (Geology and Mineralogy),
D.Sc. (Geography),
D.Sc. (Technical Sciences),
Professor, Chairman,
State Commission of Ukraine for Mineral Resources
18/7 Kutuzov Str., Kyiv, 01133, Ukraine
rudko@dkz.gov.ua
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7752-4310

Farida Isataeva
PhD (Geology),
Karaganda Technical University
Ermekova 106/4 Str., Karaganda, 100009, Republic of Kazakhstan
isataeva.farida@gmail.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6208-3292

Abstract. The geological industry of Kazakhstan is transiting to CRIRSCO, the international system of reporting standards for mineral reserves. In view of the set tasks, the problem of adjusting the geological and economic assessment of deposits is being updated in order to adapt it to the international requirements and to increase accessibility and transparency for a potential external investor. This research has been carried out on the basis of the Kazakhmys Corporation LLС, the largest international company engaged in exploring, mining and processing of various minerals. The authors of this paper have made an attempt to expand the geological and economic assessment of the enterprise by digitizing the key business processes. On the basis of the formed factual database of the geological and economic indicators and characteristics of the stratiform pyrite-copper-lead-zinc deposit Kusmuryn, which is part of the Kazakhmys Corporation LLС, the economic indicators of extracting associated components have been calculated.

Digital transformation is a key area of technological development of the mining industry in Kazakhstan for the coming years. In this regard, automation of calculating the geological and economic assessment of the investigated field will allow the company not only to reduce investment and operating costs, but also to deepen the internal analytical work to monitor the effectiveness of the applied digital solutions. Transformation of the economy of Kazakhstan presupposes state support for promising regions. The article shows that transition of the Kusmuryn deposit to underground mining in the medium term will accelerate the solution of pressing regional problems and remove social tension in the monotowns adjacent to the deposit. In order to strengthen its position in the global economy, Kazakhstan strives to achieve socio-economic goals in the field of sustainable development. It has been established that changing the method of production and automation of business processes of the Kazakhmys Corporation LLС will have a positive effect on the energy efficiency due to more rational use of available technologies. The research will improve the validity of predictive management decisions to strengthen the financial and economic situation and the international positions of the mining and smelting enterprise.

Keywords: Kazakhstan; CRIRSCO Codes; Digitizing; Deposit; Geological Economic Assessment

JEL Classifications: L53; O14; O25

Acknowledgments and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

Data Availability Statement: The dataset is available from the authors upon request.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-12

References

  1. Adams, C. A. (2017). Conceptualizing the contemporary corporate value creation process. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 906-931.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2016-2529
  2. Allinsurance. (2021, January, 27). GRI approves three new standards of sustainable development for reports for 2021.
    https://allinsurance.kz/news/finance/16381-gri-utverzhdaet-tri-novykh-standarta-ustojchivogo-razvitiya-dlya-otchetov-za-2021-god (in Russ.)
  3. Andresen, S., Bang, G., Skjærseth, J. B., & Underdal, A. (2021). Achieving the ambitious targets of the Paris Agreement: the role of key actors. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21, 1-7.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-021-09527-6
  4. Association of mining and metallurgical enterprises of Kazakhstan. (2020, July 20). Association of mining and metallurgical enterprises of Kazakhstan.
    https://agmp.kz
  5. Aubakirova G. M. (2019). Transformation of the economy of Kazakhstan: realities and prospects: Monograph. Karaganda, Ekozhan.
  6. Aubakirova, G. (2014). Features of Innovation Activity Management in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Engineering Economics, 25(2), 160-166.
    https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.25.2.3507
  7. Aubakirova, G. (2020). Transformational Change in the Economy of Kazakhstan. Studies of Russian Economic Development, 31, 113-119.
    https://doi.org/10.1134/S1075700720010037
  8. Birol, F., & Keppler, J. H. (2000). Prices, technology development and the rebound effect. Energy Policy, 28(6-7), 457-469.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00020-3
  9. Blocher, E. J., Chen, K. H., & Lin, T. W. (2005). Cost Management: A Strategic Emphasis. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
    http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/16717/1/59.Edward%20J.%20Blocher.pdf
  10. BloombergNEF. (2020). New Energy Outlook 2020. Report.
    https://about.bnef.com/new-energy-outlook
  11. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017, December 25). Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, No. 120-VI «On taxes and other obligatory payments to the budget (Tax Code)» with amendments and additions as of 01/01/2021.
  12. EY’s Global Mining & Metals Center. (2020, July 20). Top 10 business risks and opportunities – 2020.
    https://www.ey.com/en_gl/mining-metals/10-business-risks-facing-mining-and-metals
  13. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017, December 12). State Program «Digital Kazakhstan».
    https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P1700000827 (in Russ.)
  14. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017, December 27). Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, No. 125-VI «On Subsoil and Subsoil Use» (with amendments and additions as of 05.01.2021).
    https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=36715176#activate_doc=2
  15. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2017, February 17). A set of measures for the technological ­re-equipment of basic industries until 2025 including elements of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (in Russ.).
  16. Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2018, June 28). The Minister for Investment and Development of the Republic of Kazakhstan No. 478 «On approval of the State Subsoil Fund Management Program (with amendments and additions as of April 23, 2019)».
    https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33233470#pos=4;-55 (in Russ.)
  17. Häggquist, E., & Söderholm, P. (2015). The economic value of geological information: Synthesis and directions for future research. Resources Policy, 43, 91-100.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.001
  18. IATA (2015). Guidance Material and Best Practices for Alternate Parts (PMA) and Approved (non-OEM) Repairs (DER). 2nd Edition 2015.
    http://www.iata.org
  19. Issatayeva, F. M. (2020). Developing theoretical and practical aspects of the geological and economic assessment of the Kusmuryn field: dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD). KARAGANDA TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, Karaganda.
    https://www.geokniga.org/bookfiles/geokniga-razrabotka-teoreticheskih-i-prakticheskih-aspektov-geologo-ekonomicheskoy-ocen.pdf (in Russ.)
  20. Issatayeva, F. M., & Yefimenko, S. A. (2019). Online monitoring of the content of copper and silver in the ore supplied by the Kazakhmys Coprporation LLP to Zhezkazgan concentrating factories [Paper presentation]. 2nd internat. scient. and tech. internet conf. «Innovative Development of Resource-Saving Technologies of Mineral Mining and Processing». Petrosany: Universitas Publishing.
  21. Janocko, J., Ryzhkova, М., Mamzina, T., & Bereznev, S. (2019). Digitalization of Economic Evaluation of Mineral Deposits [Paper presentation]. E3S Web Conf. IVth International Innovative Mining Symposium, 105, 7.
    https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/201910504030
  22. Litvinenko, V. S. (2020). Digital Economy as a Factor in the Technological Development of the Mineral Sector. Natural Resources Research, 29, 1521-1541.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-019-09568-4
  23. Luo, Y. D., & Tung, R. L. (2007). International expansion of emerging market enterprises: A springboard perspective. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 481-498.
    https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400275
  24. Maas, K. E. H., Schaltegger, S., & Crutzen, N. (2016). Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136(A), 237-248.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.008
  25. Maghfouri, S., Rastad, E., & Mousivand, F. (2014). Stratigraphic position, origin and characteristics of manganese mineralization horizons in the Late Cretaceous volcano-sedimentary sequence, south-southwest of Sabzevar. Journal of Economic Geology, 6(2), 201-216.
    https://www.sid.ir/en/journal/ViewPaper.aspx?id=429580
  26. Marimuthu, R., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S., & Karuppiah, K. (2021). Assessment of key socio-economic and environmental challenges in the mining industry: Implications for resource policies in emerging economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 814-830.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.005
  27. Meyer, D. F., & Neethling, J. R. (2017). Meaurement of the Enabling Developmental Environment: A Comparative Study in a Developing Region. Economics and Sociology, 10(4), 67-82.
    https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-4/6
  28. Milkov, A. V. (2015). Risk tables for less biased and more consistent estimation of probability of geological success (PoS) for segments with conventional oil and gas prospective resources. Earth Science Reviews, 150, 453-476.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.08.006
  29. Morhardt, J. E., Baird, S., & Freeman, K. (2002). Scoring corporate environmental and sustainability reports using GRI 2000, ISO 14031 and other criteria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 9(4), 215-233.
    https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.26
  30. Piesse, J., & Thirtle, C. (2000). A Stochastic Frontier Approach to Firm Level Efficiency, Technological Change, and Productivity during the Early Transition in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Economics, 28(3), 473-501.
    https://doi.org/10.1006/jcec.2000.1672
  31. Plėta, T., Tvaronavičienė, M., & Casa, S. D. (2020). Cyber effect and security management aspects in critical energy infrastructures. Insights into Regional Development, 2(2), 538-548.
    https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.2(3)
  32. Pomykalski, P., Bakalarczyk, S., & Samolejova, A. (2014). Benchmarking Polish Basic Metal Manufacturing Companies. Metalurgija, 53(1), 139-141.
    https://doaj.org/article/71f50d0a6b064539be89fcc37205e16a
  33. Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2020, September 02). The Ministry of Ecology will develop the Concept of low-carbon development of Kazakhstan until 2050.
    https://primeminister.kz/ru/news/minekologii-razrabotaet-koncepciyu-nizkouglerodnogo-razvitiya-kazahstana-do-2050-goda-281457 (in Russ.)
  34. Prodani, R., Bushati, J., & Andersons, A. (2019). An assessment of impact of information and communication technology in enterprızes of Korça region. Insights into Regional Development, 1(4), 334-342.
    https://doi.org/10.9770/ird.2019.1.4(4)
  35. Qazgeology. (2019). Twenty geological reports on the KAZRC system will be completed in 2019.
    https://qazgeology.kz
  36. Radjenovic, T., & Krstic, B. (2017). Measuring Intellectual Capital of National Economies. Ekonomika, Journal for Economic Theory and Practice and Social Issues, 63(2), 31-43.
    https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.290239
  37. Rogge, K. S., & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620-1635.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004
  38. Rudko, G. I., Portnov, V. S., & Issatayeva, F. M. (2019). Technical and economic substantiation of developing Kusmuryn copper deposit (Kazakhstan). Naukovyi Visnik Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 9-24.
    https://doi.org/10.29202/nvngu/2019-6/3
  39. Rupprecht, S. M. (2020). Consideration for declaring a Mineral Reserve for TSF mining projects. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 120(9), 515-520.
    https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/1246/2020
  40. Sabuj, S. U., Ali, S. M., Hassan, K. W., & Paul, S. K. (2021).Contextual relationships among key factors related to environmental sustainability: Evidence from an emerging economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 86-99.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.026
  41. Sherin, S., Ur Rehman, Z., Hussain, S., Muhammad, N., & Bilal, T. (2020). Assessment and Quantification of Risks Associated with Small Scale Mining, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. International Journal of Economic and Environmental Geology, 11(3), 65-69.
    https://doi.org/10.46660/ijeeg.Vol11.Iss3.2020.478
  42. Singh, V., Izaguirre, E., Yemez, I., & Stigliano, H. (2016). Establishing Minimum Economic Field Size and Analysing its Role in Exploration Project Risks Assessment: Three Examples [Paper presentation]. The 12th Middle East Geosciences conf. and Exhibition, (pp. 96-102). Manama, Bahrain.
  43. Singh, V., Yemez, I., Izaguirre, E., & Racero, A. (2017). Optimal Subsurface Appraisal: A Key Link to the Success of Development Projects-Few Examples. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 14(2), 217-230.
    https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2017.217.230
  44. Söderholm, K., Söderholma, P., Heleniusb, H., Petterssona, M., Viklunda, R., Masloboevc, V., Mingalevac, T., & Petrovc, V. (2015). Environmental regulation and competitiveness in the mining industry: permitting processes with special focus on Finland, Sweden and Russia. Resources Policy, 43, 130-142.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2014.11.008
  45. Stigliano, H., Singh, V., Yemez, I., & Izaguirre, E. (2016). Establishing minimum economic field size and analyzing its role in exploration-project risks assessment: A practical approach. The Leading Edge, 35(2), 114-122.
    https://doi.org/10.1190/tle35020180.1
  46. Tsaurkubule, Z., Kenzhin, Z., Bekniyazova, D., Bayandina, G., & Dyussembekova, G. (2020). Assessment of competitiveness of regions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. Insights into Regional Development, 2(1), 469-479.
    https://doi.org/10.9770/IRD.2020.2.1(6)
  47. UNIDO. (2020, July 20). Advancing economic competitiveness.
    https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness
  48. Van der Heiden, P., Pohl, C., Mansor, S., & van Genderen, J. (2016). Necessitated absorptive capacity and metaroutines in international technology transfer: A new model. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 41, 65-78.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2016.07.001
  49. Van Rooyen, M., van der Lingen, E., &. Ross, V. E. (2020). Technology commercialization front – end framework: Metallurgical industry. Journal of the Southern African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, 120(4), 269-276.
    https://doi.org/10.17159/2411-9717/867/2020
  50. Yang, R., Xing, W., & Hou, S. (2020). Evaluating the risk factors influencing foreign direct investment in Mongolia’s mining sector: A complex network approach. Emerging Markets Review, 43, 100692.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2020.100692
  51. Yin, Wz., & Tang, Y. (2020). Interactive effect of minerals on complex ore flotation: A brief review. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 27, 571-583.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-1999-y
  52. Ziganshina, D., & Janusz-Pawletta, B. (2020). The principle of no significant harm in the Central Asian context. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 20, 713-730.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-020-09509-0

Received 11.11.2020
Received in revised form 28.12.2020
Accepted 29.12.2020
Available online 28.02.2021

View Full-TextDownload PDF
In, , , , ,

More Papers

Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market)

Hezarkhani, M., Jalalinejad, R., Mohammadpour, F., & Mahmoudi, S. (2023). Investigation of the social network marketing influence on consumer behavior with the mediating role of brand value (a case study for iPhone market). Economic Annals-XXI, 203(5-6), 25-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V203-03

Economic Annals-XXI