A study of the market reaction to CEO change

Economic Annals-ХХI: Volume 187, Issue 1-2, Pages: 206-214

Citation information:
Jabbar, A. Kh., Hasan, H. F., & Khalbas, H. N. (2021). A study of the market reaction to CEO change. Economic Annals-XXI, 187(1-2), 206-214. doi: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-20


Ali Khazaal Jabbar
PhD (Accounting),
Assistant Professor,
Department of Business Administration,
College of Administration and Economics,
University of Majsan
Amarah, Majsan, 62001, Iraq
Ali-khazaal@uomisan.edu.iq
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5880-4963

Hussein Falah Hasan
PhD (Accounting),
Lecturer,
Department of Accounting,
Dijlah University College
AlMasafi Str., Dorra, Baghdad, 00964, Iraq
hussien.falah@duc.edu.iq
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3520-804X

Hudaa Nadhim Khalbas
PhD (Accounting),
Assistant Professor,
Department of Accounting,
Dijlah University College
AlMasafi Str., Dorra, Baghdad, 00964, Iraq
huda.nadhum@duc.edu.iq
hus.dam@yahoo.com
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6238-3196

A study of the market reaction to CEO change

Abstract. The purpose of this study is to investigate how market reacts to CEO changes and how it may lead to abnormal stock returns. The research is of retrospective character and is based on publicly available information published by listed companies in Tehran Stock Exchange during 2011-2015 taken from a sample of 102 companies. The hypotheses were tested using panel regression with fixed effects for time series and merged effects for cross sections. The results of hypothesis testing showed that there is a negative and significant relationship between CEO change and abnormal stock returns. In other words, it can be argued that at the time of CEO change, stocks are underrated by stockholders, as a result of which the estimated stock return will be lower than expected.

Keywords: Abnormal Stock Returns; CEO Change; Market Reaction; Stock Valuation

JEL Classification: M40; M41; G32

Acknowledgements and Funding: The authors received no direct funding for this research.

Contribution: The authors contributed equally to this work.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21003/ea.V187-20

References

  1. Bizjak, J. M., Lemmon, M. L., & Naveen, L. (2009). Does the use of peer groups contribute to higher pay and less efficient compensation? Journal of Financial Economics, 90(2), 152-168.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.08.007
  2. Davidson, W. N., Xie, B., Xu, W., & Ning, Y. (2007). The influences of executive age, career horizon and incentives on pre-turnover earnings management. Journal of Management and Governance, 11(1), 45-60.
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-007-9015-8
  3. DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (1989). Proxy Contest and the Governance of Publicly Held Corporation. Journal of Finance Economic, 23(1), 29-59.
  4. Dianti Deilami, Z., Moradzadeh Fard, M., & Mazaheri, A. (2013), The effect of a management tenure on company value, cost of representation and information risk. Empirical Accounting Research, 3, 12-39.
  5. Furtado, E. P. H., & Rozeff, M. S. (1987). The Wealth effects of company initiated management changes. Journal of Financial Economic, 18(1), 147-160.
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/0304405X87900651
  6. Ghaemi, M., Livani Ay, J., & Dehbozorgi, S. (2018). Earnings and returns of corporate stocks. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 52(15), 71-88.
  7. Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2018). On The Impossibility of Informationally Eficient Markets. American Economic Review, 70, 393-408.
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/1805228
  8. Hu, A., & Kumar, P. (2004). Managerial entrenchment and payout policy. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 39(4), 759-790.
    https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022109000003203
  9. Jensen, M. C., & Murphy, J. K. (1990). Performance pay and top management incentives. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264.
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/2937665
  10. Kaczmarek, Sz., Kimino, S., & Pye, A. (2012). Board task-related fault lines and firm performance: A decade of evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 20(4), 337-351.
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2011.00895.x
  11. Kalyta, P. (2009). Accounting Discretion, Horizon Problem, and CEO Retirement Benefits. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1553-1573.
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/27784232
  12. Khajavi, S., & Nazemi, A. (2005). Investigating the relationship between earnings quality and stock returns with emphasis on the role of accruals in Tehran Stock Exchange. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 12, 37-60.
    https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_18449_f185a5a49df1fca55303f2497f017391.pdf (in Farsi)
  13. Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2007). Superstar CEOs. NBER Working paper, No. w14140. University of California, University of California at Los Angeles.
  14. Murphy, K. J. (2019). Incentives, learning and compensation: A theoretical and empirical investigation of managerial labor contracts. Rand Journal of Economics, 17(1), 59-76.
    https://www.jstor.org/stable/2555628
  15. Nourayi, M. M., & Mintz, S. M. (2008). Tenure firms performance, and CEOs compensation. Managerial Finance, 34(8), 524-536.
    https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350810874055
  16. Resayian, A., & Hosseini, V. (2009). The relationship between accrual quality and cost of capital in Iran. Accounting and Auditing Reviews, 15(4), 67-82.
    https://acctgrev.ut.ac.ir/article_27753.html?lang=en (in Farsi)
  17. Salas, J. M. (2010). Entrenchment, governance, and the stock price reaction to sudden executive deaths. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(3), 656-666.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2009.09.002
  18. Sohn, S., Kim, S., & Chung, K. (2010). Empirical study of the relation between timely is closure and periodic report: Focusing on unfaithful disclosure and prior error adjustment. Korean Accounting Journal, 19(4), 1-36 (in Korean).
  19. Warner, J. B., Watts, R. L., & Wruck, K. H. (2019). Stock Price and Top Management Changes. Journal of Financial Economic, 20, 461-492.
    https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90054-2
  20. Zhang, W. (2009). CEO Tenure and Earnings Quality. Corporate Finance: Governance, Corporate Control & Organization eJournal. Working paper. University of Texas at Dallas, School of Management.

Received 4.10.2020
Received in revised form 18.11.2020
Accepted 27.11.2020
Available online 28.02.2021